cracked Posted May 5, 2003 Posted May 5, 2003 I read a lot of TRs of people skiing routes like the Emmons on Rainier, Coleman-Deming on Baker, or Sitkum Glacier on Glacier Peak. Is this justifiable? When I did the Sitkum it was late season (August?) and there were many crevasses. The moat next to the cleaver was scary. My partner's leg punched through a snowbridge on the upper glacier. Other than probing, it would have been impossible to detect. On the Easton of Baker there were also plenty of crevasses. Personally, I would be reluctant to go up any of the big volcanoes without a rope. What do you think? Quote
Jason_Martin Posted May 5, 2003 Posted May 5, 2003 This is a very controversial subject. Rather than tell you my own opinions, here is a link to an excellent article on the subject written by a world class ski mountianeering guide: Skiing Glaciers Hope this helps, Jason Quote
snoboy Posted May 5, 2003 Posted May 5, 2003 Lots of good thoughts on skiing with a rope system here at telemarktips.com . Quote
AlpineK Posted May 5, 2003 Posted May 5, 2003 Ah yes, It's a sure sign of spring when we have this discussion. If you do a search, you'll find a few threads on this subject on cc.com. I ski unroped on glaciers all the time. I'm sure I would rope up if the conditions were total sketch; however just try skiing roped up once and you'll learn how hard and unfun it is. It really really helps to have a lot of glacier travel experience. If you don't you should rope up a lot more often. Quote
iain Posted May 5, 2003 Posted May 5, 2003 just point 'em down and you'll hop over most of the baddies. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.