StevenSeagal

What letter is that? Post a link please... Don't bother, you already know what it will say- he wants the troops to gay marry one another, convert to Islam, give their guns to the government, come home with a Mexican under each arm, apply for welfare, smoke weed, burn the flag, have abortions, renounce God, and spend a hap-hap-happy life having anal sex and cheating the welfare system.

5 days and you still don't realize you were baited and trolled. "LOL" Not something you bait with, Fucking sicking. When did you get all PC? Caving into the liberal doctrine, eh? What is "sicking"?

One way or another, he's always jerkin' it.

OMG! You're a sexist pig!

5 days and you still don't realize you were baited and trolled. "LOL"

Not true. President Clinton was under oath testifying to a Grand Jury. The A.G. was under oath testifying to a senate committee. Testifying to Congress also has a swearing in process, remarkably similar to a judicial proceeding. Lying in that testimony is also a criminal offense, and Congress is able to file charges against anyone who commits perjury when testifying to a Congressional Committee. Perhaps you need to look farther than just the Constitution to develop your legal arguments. Oops. Seecocks ejaculated prematurely again.

STFU nOOb. Hows that? It's not as meaningful coming from you, asshat.

Can I at least have a "STFU n00b?"

How did I prove your point? "Hate filled?" I strongly disapprove of Bush's policies, attitude, and style of governance, and I feel his manner of operation has caused damage to this country. I can't wait for someone else- R or D, or better yet, I- to lead this country into a new era. I am far from alone in this thinking. Why is that "hate"? Your reactionary response to my post in fact is reinforcing exactly what I'm saying. You can't even articulate your point in a better manner than STFU. HOw bout trying again only counter my points about Bush's damage to the social fabric of the country and world with evidence proving me wrong.

Clinton was legally allowed to get his cock sucked whenever he wanted also. But a partisan witch hunt was launched to find out all the spicy details in hopes of uncovering a bigger scandal. In the course of said investigation, Clinton lied to investigators- an indisputable crime. For which he was impeached. Now you can debate the motivation for the investigation into the US attorneys scandal all you want. Yes the pres can fire them anytime he wants. But partisan interests (yes I said it, partisan) felt there was more to it than that. In the course of this so far, they've found out that political retribution was involved- not illegal necessarily, but on the margin of being unethical, and certainly a marker of the justice department being marginalized by the executive branch in an attempt to consolidate further executive power. Personally, given the level to which Bush has attempted to go it alone and immunize himself from any oversight, these are things I'm glad to know are going on. And, oh by the way- in the course of the investigation, his AG LIED TO INVESTIGATORS! And Congress. That's illegal, last I checked. So do we forget about it since it was just a partisan witch hunt by liberals (oops there's republicans participating too, they must be liberals in disguise)? Or would that make the blowjob incident seem petty also?

Shades of gray huh? I guess you know me better than I know myself! I'll be voting for the Revolutionary Communist Party candidate, actually. So the assertion here is that Clinton and Bush are equally mediocre, but since you are a "conservative", how dare I or anyone suggest that Bush is worse lest I be a commie sympathizer who wants to take your guns, turn you gay, and have the terrorists win. If Bush is so 'mediocre' why are you so reactionary to any criticism by anyone other than fellow conservatives as "whining" and fishing for nothing? Clinton made plenty of mistakes and was mediocre for sure, and while I could list many reasons I think Bush is infinitely worse, one single reason suffices: his go-it-alone attitude and refusal to compromise (ironically, that same "decisiveness" that some use to qualify his character) or listen to anyone has perhaps irreversibly destroyed the social fabric of not only this country but has alienated this country from the rest of the world. He's employed a PR apparatus that has driven a wedge right down the middle of this country and brainwashed both left and right into thinking we're red and blue, a convenient tactic to quietly forge ahead with his own agenda while the citizenry fights among itself. His ardent supporters would have you believe that those who dislike Bush, which at last count numbers about 70% in the US and probably 90%+ in the remainder of the world- those people changed, they changed for the worse, they're the ones who don't get it, and Bush and his miniscule group of supporters are the ones who've stayed pure. That sort of arrogance is so blatant I don't know how anyone can't see it. At least Reagan spoke to the country as a whole, and people listened. Same with Clinton, and Bush Sr. This president is without equal in my lifetime for his divisiveness and hypocracy. He's not even a conservative- look at his budgets. We're in debt up to our ass. Do you deny what he is- an opportunistic egomaniac surrounded by elitist interests? Do you think this man is making this a better country?

What is it about conservatives with this "if you criticize Bush then you must LOVE Clinton!" Everything works in opposites with you guys. If you disagree with the war then you must love terrorists and hate America. On and on. There's just no other possible views but a) your own, and b) the extreme, extreme opposite. I won't be voting for Hillary in 2008 if you must know. At this point the only support I have for any political movement is seeing corruption get exposed. The unfortunate part of it is, like in the past, those doing all the police work today will probably be the ones being investigated ten years from now.

Hi there. My name Seahawks. It good name. Other name no good. Me not learn grammer good. It tough.

Just becuase your a fanatic suck my own cock dem, give it up. Struck some nerves yesterday, got all the freaks riled. Indeed. Gotta love how the DemoLibs can spew vitriol about Bush, the "Bushies", BushCo, und so weiter ad nauseaum, but immediately go into knee-jerk attack mode at one mention of anything negative about Clinton. You can't expect more from ass clowns. "Knee jerk attack mode" is talking about Clinton to divert attention away from current government corruption as if that has anything to do with it. Unless of course you deny there's any corruption in the current administration, in which case you have your head in the sand.

Still stroking it to that photo are you?

My grandfather, cantankerous Archie Bunker type that he was, once while observing a 2 year throwing a tantrum at a nearby table in a restaurant, summed it up perfectly: Cutting the parents in half with his deadpan stare: "what that kid needs is a good, swift, BEATING!!!!"

V7 your the biggest idiot of all. Lead the group. Well I hope I'm a close second on your list, cock smoker.

You must be waiting for kevbone and his 15 year old photo of Pamela Anderson's rubbery visage to start spanking it eh?

Don't worry Seecocks should be arriving at his usual mid morning time to start steaming it up in here.

You don't pay attention do you? The Democrats scored a huge victory in the last election. Because the corruption was obvious. The same way the Dem's lost power in 1994- corruption was obvious, the people wanted a change then as they do now. Even most Republicans are distancing themselves from Bush, yet KNOBS like you stubbornly hold on to this line that any attempt at investigation is just a witch of hunt of sorts. Emails don't lie. Gonzales lied to Congress. That's just the beginning. And anyone with a brain can see the inner White House circle has made a long term concerted effort to castrate Congress and the Judicial branch. Bush has a child's mind- the perfect dictator who thinks he's accountable to no one. His actions are clear yet dumbshits like you who fantasize about having that much power yourselves refuse to challenge the authority.

That's right, Peter. But the government sold me out. You ever see Hard to Kill? That's just one example. I've had it with these guys. They think they're Above the Law. Well, they aren't above mine.

Doesn't matter if I could prove or not. He had the right to do it. So why did Gonzales lie to Congress then?

Yup God forbid anyone in the general population of citizenry should find out what war actually entails. That might spoil it for everyone.

It does say a lot for the stupidity of Americans now doesn't it?