KaskadskyjKozak

i guess that's why we (boarders) are always the last ones on the mountain at the end of the day i actually ride primarily with tele skiers That's because snowboarders spend half the day sitting on the slopes just over a blind hump, or immediately off the lift. You spent too much time resting and not enough time "riding" Snowboarders also show their skillz as they go on terrain they can't ride down and lean one their back edge scraping all the good snow off for the rest of us.

What about with your tongue? Even JD will not clean his filthy tongue.

WaMu sucks donkey schlangs

Troll

egregious gregarious would be the opposite of these men at the time, as they were each solo Thanks Mr. Webster.

is there bad alcohol?? Methanol. Doesn't stop russkie's from buying their водка from street venders in Moskva... skull

is there bad alcohol??

May the cluebird vacate its bowels in Kevboner's vicinity. KBoner: I fart in your general direction

homophobe.

"Becoming" would imply you were not already one. Quit shitting on every thread and get a life, you tool. Shitting on a thread is purely a madder of perspective. the general consensus is that you are shit

or the waters of life... aqua vitae, eau de vie, uisge beatha

any fine scotch whisky.

"Becoming" would imply you were not already one. Quit shitting on every thread and get a life, you tool.

I tried some Moldovan brandy recently which was good. It was at a new year's eve party and the host insisted it compared with $50 French cognacs in terms of quality and taste (it runs $20 or so). I've heard scotch doesn't go well with smokes. Are you drinking Irish whiskey or Canadian whisey, by any chance?

I've only recently acquired a taste for fine whiskeys. I'm working through some scotches right now (Glenlivet 15/oak, and Laphroaig 15yr). I'm just starting on brandies, which I prefer for desert of course. Got some Armenian stuff (Yerevan 5star) which is tasty, as well as Greek Metaxa (7 star) which I don't like as much. When I get through one of these, I'll probably pick up some fine French cognac or armagnac. I've never tried cigars other than an occasional cheap one. Any rec's where to start?

what do you drink with your smokes?

Do you also have bull horns on the hood of your car? STFU, Kevboner.

I'm on the fence about where I stand on this case but I will say that I'm not sure I agree with this statement. Do you really think you have to actually be hurt to defend yourself? What would it take? Do you have to be struck/stabbed/shot before you can shoot? I think that there are certainly cases where threat is enough to defend yourself. Shoot the guy in the legs or stomach, why go for the chest?

I didn't see the show. The only one who saw the show is the guy in jail. And the Dead guy. Appears the guy is trigger happy. He should be in jail. Dateline interviewed several people who had worked with the victim. One of them said that he knew something like this would happen. The man had an extremely volatile temper. He had assaulted others before. The former coworker likened the man to a ticking time bomb. None of this information was presented to the jury. Also it is pretty clear that many of you commenting on this thread did not read very much about this case. First of all the defendant did not shoot any dog. He fired a warning shot which scared the dogs away. Second, they interviewed someone in the dog pound from where the yellow lab came, and he said the dog had been there because he was a biter. I put myself in the defendant's shoes because I had been in a very similar situation myself. A few years ago, I was out for a run on my lunch break. I'd just sprinted up a big hill in Kinnear Park at Lower Queen Anne, when I came upon a man walking an unleashed dog. It was a medium sized poodle mix. The dog charged me. Like the man in the story above, I yelled at the man, "call your dog off! call your dog off". He just stood there, mute as he let the dog attack me. I kicked in it's direction to keep it from biting me. I managed to scare it (not sure if I actually struck it). At that point, I would of continued at a run, but I was completely out of breath. The man charged me with his fists raised. He stood there threatening me, while all I could do was gasp. If I had had a gun I would have shot the bastard. I have a right to run through a public park without being attacked by someone's dog and then by the owner who fails to control it. All I was doing was minding my own business. By the way, the law in Arizona was subsequently changed to put the onus on the prosecutor to prove that defendant acted in self-defense, rather than on the defendant. You obviously didn't read our posts very carefully. We were speaking hypothetically that it would be acceptable to shoot a threatending dog. NO ONE said that the man did shoot the dog. You should read more closely before admonishing us to do so. It is obvious you have not gotten over your run in with someone who scared you. Here is a wake up call for you--you don't get to shoot people for scaring you. You are alive an unharmed. That makes it pretty obvious that you didn't have the right to shoot that person. And trust me, I know what it's like to be attacked. But killing another human being is the most egregarious error that one could ever make. You people make wonderfun armchair quarterbacks. You are, like the prosecutor, excellent at judging a person for something had did when he had only an instant to make a decision that might determined whether he lived or died. I would have crushed that guys larynx, and broke his kneecaps.

Just imagine...not using this crap Amen.

What? Just imagine... creating integrity constraints just by tracing a line between two tables. Add voice recognition software and you could even combine the UI technology with verbal commands - create index, primary key, add check constraint. Or within an IDE, dragging and dropping JSF, Swing, or (retch) ASP.NET components. Using your fingers to resize elements on Class or ER diagrams, or borders for UI components. Sweet! Be careful there, you might turn archy on!! Funny enough, while I was reading that post I figured I'd respond with "I'm wet", but you already saw that coming. nice double entendre

What? Just imagine... creating integrity constraints just by tracing a line between two tables. Add voice recognition software and you could even combine the UI technology with verbal commands - create index, primary key, add check constraint. Or within an IDE, dragging and dropping JSF, Swing, or (retch) ASP.NET components. Using your fingers to resize elements on Class or ER diagrams, or borders for UI components. Sweet!

I'd love to see this kind of UI in and IDE, say to design a DB schema or for creating GUIs.

This just appeared in my mailbox. What moron could pen this text and send it off thinking it will convince any English-speaking person that it is legit? ----------------- Monster.com company greets you Kaskadskyj Kozak. transmitting the full response if the validator matches, and we avoid We are happy to inform you that we had succesfully upgraded our an extra round trip if it does not match. site. Because of our system has great changes, you have to install Monster.com certificated utility (click here) to be able to use monster.com database. If you dont setup this tool until March, the 14st, 2007, you will not be able to use your account You dont have to answer this letter - its just a newsletter. Thanks for cooperation.

yes