sailBOI

Gosh, what makes liberals so angry ? Maybe it is a Civil War afterall...( or UNcivil )

OK.......no introduction : http://protestwarrior.com/nimages/signs/pdf/pw_sign_16.pdf

NOTHING DIVIDES MORE THAN DUPLICITY...LIBERALS AND THEIR SUPPORTERS IN MEDIA TENDED TO IGNORE CLINTON'S FREQUENT ABUSE OF WOMEN...EVEN SO GENDER EQUALITY IS A CORE DEMOCRATIC PARTY ISSUE ! THE CONVERSE IS THAT CONSERVATIVE VALUES HOLD RESPECT FOR WOMEN AS CORE...here is a story of two respected conservative women, and how one of them struck back at CLINTON the abuser........three cheers for Nancy Regan : Two Classy Ladies Consider two very classy ladies (as reported by Newsmax.com): - After having suffered a stroke and with her doctors cautioning her against it, Lady Margaret Thatcher flew across the Atlantic to attend the funeral of her friend and fellow champion of freedom, Ronald Reagan. She not only attended the rites at the National Cathedral last Friday morning, but she then flew with the Reagan family another five hours across the country to be with her friend at his sunset burial service in California. She was the only world leader to attend both the funeral in Washington and the burial in Simi Valley. But her love and respect for our 40th president can be seen in two other truly beautiful gestures. It is being said that Prime Minister Thatcher believed the funeral of Ronald Reagan would be one of the last great events in her public life. It was so important to her that, over a year ago, with her speech slightly slurred by the stroke she had suffered, she went ahead and videotaped the 10-minute eulogy that was played during Friday's morning rites, expressing her heartfelt love and admiration for the Gipper. She feared that, at the time of Reagan's funeral, her own health might've deteriorated to the point that she either would not physically be able to attend or would not be able to speak intelligibly. And two years ago, with Reagan's health failing, she went ahead and bought the black dress that she wore on Friday. Ever since then, wherever she has traveled, she took the dress with her - in case Reagan passed away suddenly, leaving her no time to fly back to London! What a class act! - And then there was Nancy Reagan herself, who steadfastly cared for her husband through his declining years and then bravely, shared his passing with all of us last week. As if that wasn't classy enough, it was Nancy who personally refused to allow former President Bill Clinton to speak at the funeral in Washington! According to former Republican congressman John LeBoutillier, who forged close ties with the Reagans during their tenure at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., Nancy feels that Billy Boy stained (you should pardon the expression) the image of the Oval Office and the Presidency itself. Both Ronald and Nancy Reagan had REVERED the Oval Office. Reagan had made it his policy, throughout his eight years in power, never to enter "the Oval" without a suit and tie on. Before his inauguration in 1981, Reagan reportedly told aides that he had been shocked by the photographs he'd seen of President Jimmy Carter casually lounging in the Oval Office wearing blue jeans and without a tie. He told his aides that things like that would change once he was sworn in. Of course, Jimmy's casual approach was NOTHING compared to the depravity of Bill Clinton in the Oval Office, his pants down around his ankles and Monica on her knees. THAT had been too much for Nancy Reagan! So, when word reached her last week that Bill Clinton wanted to speak at her husband's funeral (to prevent it from being "too politicized," he said), her answer was a resounding NO! A source close to the Reagan family told LeBoutillier that politics had nothing to do with it. She simply would not permit her husband's funeral to be "sullied" by the man who had "desecrated" the Oval Office, a shrine of freedom that Ronald Reagan had held as a sacred trust! Way to go, Mrs. Reagan! Right on!!!!!

BUSH HAS HAD LITTLE EFFECT DUE TO ALL THE WACKOS CLINTON/GORE INSERTED INTO FEDEAL AGENCIES OVER EIGHT YEARS. IF YOU WANT TO GUARANTEE THAT WE WILL BE LOCKED OUT OF THE WILDERNESS AREAS......VOTE KERRY http://kerry-04.com/photos/wackos.php

I would vote for you if you promise PUBLIC ACCESS....stand up to the Dark Greens and keep the roads to our trail heads OPEN www.brinnonprosperity.org

How are you going to ride you bike to the movie tonight if your foot is hurt ? Please put honesty first prior to calling others losers

HEY, another friend

OK, he is a brilliant, but shrill, WIMP

SO, you will have to drive to the movie in your gas guzzler Just keep an eye out for the those "Dean People Suck" bumper stickers.....!

EXACTLY, all liberal Democrats, so Podhertz defense of Bush is all that much more important !

You can still watch out for the "DEAN PEOPLE SUCK" bumper stickers.........maybe you will see one of Kerry's SUV's, the stickers are on there also

Just trying to be sure every one sees it since one of the main themes on the SPRAY threads is how stupid GWB is ! Among his many awards, Podhertz is a Medal of Freedom winner : http://www.medaloffreedom.com/NormanPodhoretz.htm

OK, he seems to not be too bright, but he is smart enough to DRIVE THE LIBERALS CRAZY ! "New York Post columnist John Podhoretz has equal amounts of love for George W. Bush and scorn for Bush's prominent liberal critics. In this energetic defense of the president, he paints a picture of Bush as being much cagier and politically clever than some of the more well-known voices on the left give him credit for." http://hallnonfiction.com/store/books_0312324723_Bush-Country--How-Dubya-Became-a-Great-President-While-Driving-Liberals-Insane.html

As you drive your car ( running on Iraqui oil ) to the theater, keep an eye out for my "DEAN PEOPLE SUCK" bumper stickers

OK, he seems to not be too bright, but he is smart enough to DRIVE THE LIBERALS CRAZY ! "New York Post columnist John Podhoretz has equal amounts of love for George W. Bush and scorn for Bush's prominent liberal critics. In this energetic defense of the president, he paints a picture of Bush as being much cagier and politically clever than some of the more well-known voices on the left give him credit for." http://hallnonfiction.com/store/books_0312324723_Bush-Country--How-Dubya-Became-a-Great-President-While-Driving-Liberals-Insane.html

OK, he seems to not be too bright, but he is smart enough to DRIVE THE LIBERALS CRAZY ! "New York Post columnist John Podhoretz has equal amounts of love for George W. Bush and scorn for Bush's prominent liberal critics. In this energetic defense of the president, he paints a picture of Bush as being much cagier and politically clever than some of the more well-known voices on the left give him credit for." http://hallnonfiction.com/store/books_0312324723_Bush-Country--How-Dubya-Became-a-Great-President-While-Driving-Liberals-Insane.html

Under Clinton there was one terror act against the US after another ! You don't keep a slippery bastard like Saddam from acting against you by flying over his country/ This is an interesting piece from the NZ Herald : Paul Thomas: Focus on Clinton's account of Monica dalliance inevitable 28.06.2004 COMMENT It took $16 million and 957 pages, but now we know: to paraphrase a couple of mountaineers, Bill Clinton knocked off Monica Lewinsky because she was there. I don't suppose many people thought love had much to do with it but it's nice to have these things cleared up. The fact that media interest in Clinton's biblical slab of a memoir has focused predominantly on this dalliance reaffirms what was apparent at the time: there was more to it than a man - albeit the most powerful man on earth - getting caught with his pants down. For cultural conservatives the Lewinsky sleazefest both epitomised and defined the Clinton presidency. Liberal opinion will continue to ridicule the preoccupation with the private and minor indiscretions of an important world figure. Those who categorised the scandal as a mountain made out of a molehill had a point, but they also missed a point. In democratic politics, particularly in the United States, personality matters as much as policy, and few politicians have deployed their personal magnetism as calculatedly and effectively as Clinton. If you charm your way into office, it's likely your opponents will seek to turn that asset into a liability, especially when you do most of the dirty work for them. There were many ways of debating the issue. A common division was between those who believe that in the grand scheme of things - and if anyone on earth resides in the grand scheme of things, it's the US President - a few furtive sexual encounters don't amount to a row of beans, and those who believe public and private morality are inseparable. But the private-public line is increasingly blurred, and a row of beans is often in the eye of the beholder. Recently the boss of a major British bank was forced to resign because he downloaded pornography on his office computer, yet Clinton's defenders argued that it was no one else's business what he and the intern got up to in the Oval Office while his wife and daughter slept upstairs. As his critics pointed out at the time, the President was being held to lower standards of behaviour and accountability than a chief executive or a school principal. On the other hand, there are many chief executives and school principals in America, none of whom gained their position by winning a national election. If the polls had shown Americans were united in the view that Clinton should resign, he might have done so. Given that sex makes hypocrites of us all, it's interesting to speculate on the reaction had Clinton made a habit of getting quietly trashed on Tennessee whiskey while Hillary and Chelsea were getting their beauty sleep. There are precedents here. The final dent in Richard Nixon's battered reputation was the revelation that he was prone to conducting drunken late-night and one-sided conversations with a portrait of Abraham Lincoln. And Winston Churchill's physician, Lord Avebury, caused consternation with his claim that the great man was pie-eyed for much of World War II. There's little doubt that the man often hailed as the greatest figure of the 20th century had a serious booze habit. His biographer William Manchester said of him, "there is always some alcohol in his bloodstream". When told that drinking wasn't permitted in the presence of the King of Saudi Arabia, for whom he was about to host a luncheon, Churchill informed the king's interpreter that his rule of life prescribed "as an absolutely sacred rite the drinking of alcohol before, after and, if need be, during all meals and in the intervals between them". Had Clinton, who also enjoyed a cigar, although he found uses for them that probably never occurred to Churchill, been overly fond of a drink, there would've been calls from the religious right for his removal on grounds of lack of moral fibre and much hand-wringing within the political establishment about an unsteady finger on the nuclear trigger. But is the world a safer place because George W. Bush is teetotal? When Churchill's grandson branded Lord Avebury's claim "vile and malicious", the satirist Auberon Waugh countered that it wasn't a bad advertisement for Churchill so much as a good advertisement for drunkenness. After all, wrote Waugh, "old Winston did actually win the war". Exactly. The catastrophic strategic errors of the war (and the genocide that necessitated it) were perpetrated not by Churchill, who lived on brandy, Pol Roger champagne and Cuban cigars, but by the militantly anti-alcohol and anti-tobacco Adolf Hitler.

If you don't feel threatened, it's because Kerry isn't in the White House yet/ But don't worry, they are training the young Islamics for the day when he is in the White House ! www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=39145

WOW, it's great to feel welcome

Sorry I am so simple and stupid, luckily we have folks like you to judge us all ! =================== To Kill an American You probably missed it in the rush of news last week, but there was actually a report that someone in Pakistan had published in a newspaper an offer of a reward to anyone who killed an American, any American. So anAustralian dentist wrote the following to let everyone know what an American is, so ! they wou ld know when they found one. (Good on ya, mate!!!!) An American is English, or French, or Italian, Irish, German, Spanish, Polish, Russian or Greek. An American may also be Canadian, Mexican, African, Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Australian, Iranian, Asian, or Arab, or Pakistani, or Afghan. An American may also be a Cherokee, Osage, Blackfoot, Navaho, Apache, Seminole or one of the many other tribes known as native Americans. An American is Christian, or he could be Jewish, or Buddhist, or Muslim. In fact, there are more Muslims in America than in Afghanistan. The only difference is that in America they are free to worship as each of them chooses. An American is also free to believe in no religion. For that he will answer only to God, not to the government, or to armed thugs claiming to speak for the government and for God. An American is from the most prosperous land in the history of the world. The root of that prosperity can be found in the Declaration of Independence, which recognizes the God given right of each person the pursuit of happiness. An American is generous. Americans have helped out just about every other nation in the world in their time of need. When Afghanistan was overrun by the Soviet army 20 years ago, Americans came with arms and supplies to enable the people to win back their country.! As of the morning of September 11, Americans had given more than any other nation to the poor in Afghanistan. Americans welcome the best, the best products, the best books, the best music, the best food, the best athletes. But they also welcome the least. The national symbol of America, The Statue of Liberty, welcomes your tired and your poor, the wretched refuse of your teeming shores, the homeless, tempest tossed. These in fact are the people who built America. Some of them were working in the Twin Towers the morning of September 11, 2001 earning a better life for their families. I've been told that the World Trade Center victims were from at least 30 other countries, cultures, and first languages, including those that aided and abetted the terrorists. So youcan try to kill an American if you must. Hitler did. So did General Tojo, and Stalin, and Mao Tse-Tung, and every bloodthirsty tyrant in the history of the world. But, in doing so you would just be killing yourself. Because Americans are not a particular people from a particular place. They are the embodiment of the human spirit of freedom. Everyone who holds to that spirit, everywhere, is an American.

Get your bumper stickers here.......... http://www.shopmetrospy.com/free_dean_people_sticker.htm

SEATTLE FOLKS SHOULD BE REMINDED THAT KERRY IS NOT THE FIRST LIBERAL MISFIT THEY SUPPORTED! GET YOUR FREE " DEAN PEOPLE SUCK " BUMPER STICKERS HERE: http://www.shopmetrospy.com/free_dean_people_sticker.htm

Don't take your eye off the ball, follow Kerry developments here : http://www.kerrycore.com/ http://www.scaryjohnkerry.com/itsgoodtobejfk.htm

BUT, Kerry is not IDLY debating the merits of the war, he is busy jetting between his many luxury mansions : http://www.scaryjohnkerry.com/itsgoodtobejfk.htm AND, lending aid and comfort to our enemies, which is why he is widely quoted in the Islamic media ! http://www.kerrycore.com/

REGARDING THIS ORIGIONAL THREAD , LOOK HERE FOR CLARIFICATION ON GWB : http://www.cascadeclimbers.com/threadz/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/366828/page/0/view/collapsed/sb/5/o/all/fpart/1