i really don't care what you think of my point of view.
i didn't claim any "facts" other than douche counting the republican votes wrote what matt said he did, which you dismissed as "its on a blog, why should i believe that". i am being balanced in that I think the Republicans in Washington deserve to have their votes counted, and its obviously from that article that Esser is douchebag who doesn't care about fairness...only about winning. Obviously he isn't the only one with that problem. What I don't understand is what problem you have admitting that Esser wrote that article or admitting that his vote counting pratices are questionable in what was a close race for WA repubs. I just don't understand why you're so quick to dismiss that.
i'm perfectly willing to be humble and admit where I'm wrong. but I don't need to do that in this case, because, I'm not wrong. How is it "one-sided, myopic, black-and-white-my-side-right-good-and-swell-your-side-bad-evil-wrong as can be."? Do tell me of the virtues of Esser! I'm all ears and prepared to humbly admit I was wrong. But unless you produce, you're full of shit and I don't appreciate your baseless name calling.