Poseur

2 prostitutes (bitches) were in a taxi, on their way home after work. Bitch 1 : I smell sperm!! Bitch 2 : Sorry, I burped!!

Some Sunday night quiet time and a little quality programming.... [ 08-04-2002, 10:27 AM: Message edited by: Poseur ]

Single Moms in mini-vans ROCK!

Naw, that's just me exhaling...

Dude, that bowl was PACKED!

Dude, that bowl was PACKED!

Some new material... Drinks & Personalities.... Drink: Beer Personality: Casual, low-maintenance; down to earth. Your Approach: Challenge her to a game of pool. Drink: Blender Drinks Personality: Flaky, whiny, annoying; a pain in the buttocks. Your Approach: Avoid her, unless you want to be her cabin boy. Drink: Mixed Drinks Personality: Older, more refined, high maintenance, has very picky taste; knows exactly what she wants. Your Approach: You won't have to approach her,> if she is interested, she'll send YOU a drink. Drink: Wine - (does not include White Zinfandel, see below) Personality: Conservative and classy; sophisticated yet giggles. Your Approach: Tell her you love to travel and spend quiet evenings with friends. Drink: White Zinfandel Personality: Easy; thinks she is classy and sophisticated, actually has no clue. Your approach: Make her feel smarter than she is.... this should be an easy target. Drink: Shots Personality: Likes to hang with frat-boy pals and looking to get totally drunk...... and naked. Your Approach: Easiest hit in the joint. You have been blessed this evening. Nothing to do but wait. However, be careful not to make her mad! Then there is the MALE addendum. The deal with guys is, as always, very simple and clear cut: Domestic Beer: He's poor and wants to get laid. Imported Beer: He likes good beer and wants to get laid. Wine: He's hoping that the wine thing will give him a sophisticated image to help him get laid. Whiskey: He doesn't give a hoot about anything but getting laid. Tequila: He is thinking he has a chance with the toothless waitress. White Zinfandel: He's gay.

Good points OW. Myself, I prefer good old fashioned, straight forward regulation, rather than trying to "incentivize" (pollution credits, etc.) good behavior. Mr. Cavey, my weekend TR goes like this, took a little road trip, got a brand new pair of T2s at a summer closeout rockin price, checked out a hot tip on a new fishin hole (which also gave me a chance to try out the 4WD on my new truck), saw nothin but dinks so I let the dogs fly, then came home and worked on getting fat. Bring on the winter! Until then I pledge to stop stressin the eco/political stuff and instead spend allot of time on the chronic gumbies thread.

Dude, a 9 cent stock? I say book it. Helluva scalp though.

Can't resist a page top... ....Muir on Saturday

Well, since the thread is still alive... quote: Let me try an understand your statement. You can't read? What I read was: "That is what will happen again to any place we let profit motivated corporations have their way in." While Billy does diserve the enima, and overpopulation is clearly root of these problems, you seem to need some practice with reading comprehension. Your arguement smacks of what you accused KeithKSchultz of doing. Yes Bug, I can read, can you? Just because a river in the midwest caught on fire and fish died in a midwest lake 30 YEARS AGO does not mean all corporations will kill fish or pollute a river. Do you really believe that ALL corporations will do this? There are many corporations that do not produce any pollutants - accounting, law firms, etc., and many others that manage their waste responsibly. To throw out two old incidences to smear an entire group within in society is BS. There are a multitude of corpoations that have been in business during the last 30 years and no rivers have caught on fire and no lakes have spit out its fish on the shoreline. If you are against drilling in ANWR - fine, I can respect, but hysterical and obviously transparent BS scare tactics does a diservice to legitimate efforts to protect the environment - the ol cry wolf story.... Ol Billy would probably enjoy that enema a little too much. [ 07-31-2002, 08:22 AM: Message edited by: Poseur ]

Let me try an understand your statement. If we drill for oil in Alaska the rivers in the midwest are goiong to catch fire and the fish in Lake Michigan are going to die? With all due respect, this sounds more like the typical hysterical scare tactics mainstream enviro organizations use to get people to send them some money so they can pay themselves and liberal politicans to fulfill their responsibilities as Democratic Party lapdogs. If enviros were serious about protecting the environment they wouldn't coward away from the primary cause and motivation for acts that have an impact on the environment - POPULATION! Until that root cause of all environmental impacts can be addressed maturely, rather than demagogued, I'm afraid the "natural" environment doesn't stand much of a chance over the long run. Too bad the Clinton Administration never tried to plug that beryllium loophole as part of its environmental program. Maybe he should get the enema? Me, I'll just take the oil thank you.

sayjay, what AT bindings are you tele'ing in? I heard you can rip em out if you freeheel.

You can go AT with any ski. I would recommend fat ones, especially for BC use. I would get the boots also, they'll make skiing easier, and they don't walk too bad either. My setup, which is used for BC and lifts, Tua 112s, Fristchi Freerides, and Scarpa Lazer (I've got an even softer set of skis for my tele experiment). Check out Telemark Pyrenees for good prices and service.

Why is this in Spray? Are we expecting a little spray action between AT'rs and Tele? I AT and have always heard it's better in the BC than tele because the no resistance pivot of the AT binding doesn't force the tip down into the snow, and a locked heel provides more control for hairy downhills. OTOH, I just bought a tele ski and can't wait to give it a try (and I'm still looking for boots and bindings?). Spray away!!!

Nice little plinker.

Is getting in the toaster a sexual reference?

!!

quote: Which p word, piece? Did you mean 38 or 44 caliber? psssst...buddy, over here........"population".

Very well said OW. It would be nice if common sense ruled the day but as you said.... Of course, eventually these wilderness areas will probably not be able to withstand an increasing population seeking lumber, land, water, minerals, etc., seeking their piece of the American dream. Ooops, did I actually say the "P" word? How un-PC of me, I should be shot!

Tell it!