Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Big surprise. Their stimulus program (you know, the one where the money actually gets spent, doesn't get nickel and dimed by obstructionist Republicans, or used to cover already existing state debts) appears to be working. Our "new deal", on the other hand, looks like a prolapsed bowel. Ha, the GOP can not only take credit for the long-term crisis by championing the "free-market" fundamentalism that caused it but we'll also be able to look back to them for refusing to fix it! "Quick--where's the Mexicans/commies/terrerists we can blame all this shit on?"

 

China's economy grows 7.9% in stunning rebound

by Robert J. Saiget Robert J. Saiget Thu Jul 16, 6:36 am ET

 

BEIJING (AFP) – China's economy grew 7.9 percent in the second quarter of 2009, the government said Thursday, in a stunning turnaround for the Asian powerhouse that offered some hope for the rest of the world.

 

With help from 580 billion dollars in government pump priming, the world's third biggest economy picked up pace again after the global economic crisis dragged growth down to 6.1 percent in the first quarter.

 

"The economy is rebounding and the strength of the recovery is increasing," National Bureau Spokesman Li Xiaochao said at a media briefing to release the data.

 

China's gross domestic product grew by 7.1 percent in the first half of 2009 compared with the same period a year earlier, according to the bureau.

 

This put China back on track to achieve its goal of 8.0 percent growth for the year, despite the financial crisis hitting its crucial export sector particularly hard.

 

Analysts said the rebound in China would offer a boost of confidence for the global economy as it struggles out of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s.

 

"China is the first big country to have made a strong comeback, so its rebound will definitely offer a stabilising signal for the world economy," said He Jun, a Beijing-based analyst with the Anbound Consulting research group.

 

However, He and other analysts cautioned that immediate and direct benefits would be limited to countries that import heavily into China, chiefly resource-rich exporters and neighbouring nations in Asia.

 

Before the global economic crisis struck, China experienced double-digit annual growth from 2003 to 2007, and again for the first two quarters of last year.

 

To fight the downturn, the government began implementing a four-trillion-yuan (580-billion-dollar) stimulus package from November last year.

 

Li described the impact of the package as "remarkable", but he also warned pitfalls lay ahead amid concerns of bubbles in real estate and other key sectors.

 

"There are many difficulties and challenges existing in the current national economic performance. The base for recovery is still weak. The momentum for picking up is unstable," he said.

 

Li's cautious attitude appeared to infect China's stock market as shares closed down 0.15 percent on Thursday amid concerns over the economy in the second half year, dealers said.

 

The Shanghai Composite Index, which covers A and B shares, was down 4.81 points to 3,183.74 on turnover of 218.4 billion yuan.

 

Economists also warned that China's rebound was unbalanced, with the export sector still struggling while massive bank lending had fuelled the potential for asset price bubbles and inflation.

 

"Although private sector investment has picked up, growth still relies heavily on the central government?s expansionary policies," said Lu Zhengwei, a Shanghai-based economist with the Industrial Bank.

 

Nevertheless, Lu and other analysts said China's economy would likely grow by around 8.0 percent in 2009, in line with the government's target.

 

The figure is generally seen as the minimum growth needed to create enough jobs and prevent major social unrest in the nation of 1.3 billion people.

 

China's exports dropped 21.4 percent year-on-year in June, the government said last week, the eighth straight monthly decline.

 

However, industrial output, which illustrates activity in the nation's millions of factories and workshops, expanded by 9.1 percent in the second quarter of 2009 from a year earlier, the bureau said.

 

In June, industrial output increased by 10.7 percent, and by 7.0 percent for the first half of 2009.

 

China's urban fixed asset investments, a measure of government spending on infrastructure, rose 33.6 percent in the first half of 2009 compared with the same period a year earlier, the statistics bureau said.

 

Investments in urban fixed assets increased by 35.3 percent in June year-on-year, according to the bureau.

 

And the consumer price index, the main gauge of inflation, fell 1.7 percent in June compared with the same month a year earlier, a further decline from May's drop of 1.4 percent, the bureau said.

  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Part of China's success of late is due to the fact that many big capitalist companies are more aggressively outsourcing to cheaper labor.

I wish them well but do not hold them up as a shining example of pure communism. Their success is directly linked to unbridled exploitation of resources and acceptance of capitalist influence. They would be much further ahead if they allowed a more open format for business and education.

The old guard cannot die off too soon imo.

Posted
Part of China's success of late is due to the fact that many big capitalist companies are more aggressively outsourcing to cheaper labor.

I wish them well but do not hold them up as a shining example of pure communism. Their success is directly linked to unbridled exploitation of resources and acceptance of capitalist influence. They would be much further ahead if they allowed a more open format for business and education.

The old guard cannot die off too soon imo.

 

Bingo, you can't tell their government policies apart from Obamas in many ways. (the heavy handed treatment of the Ugirs and Tibetians and some others excluded of course) However, they emphasis education heavily and their educational system, particularly of engineers, can't be faulted in anyway for causing them to be lagging...... in fact, I believe the reverse to be true.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...