archenemy Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 http://www.techrivet.com/2007/03/30/New+Interfaces+Redux.aspx They only look like coasters. Quote
kevbone Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 Totally rad if is was 19 again and had a bunch of acid. Quote
Seahawks Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 Totally rad if is was 19 again and had a bunch of acid. Is that the problem??? Flash backs? Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 Totally rad if is was 19 again and had a bunch of acid. Is that the problem??? Flash backs? the problem is a cranial-rectal inversion Quote
archenemy Posted April 5, 2007 Author Posted April 5, 2007 I would love to be in the design field creating these things. These people are incredible!!! Quote
ZimZam Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 I used to be able to keep up w/ the latest technologies. Now I'm just baffled. Could you possibly explain what they are? Quote
kevbone Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 Could you possibly explain what they are? Acid toys. Quote
archenemy Posted April 5, 2007 Author Posted April 5, 2007 I used to be able to keep up w/ the latest technologies. Now I'm just baffled. Could you possibly explain what they are? Fun. The focus is actually on the development in the area of new user interfaces. The objects themeselves are secondary to this concern. I look at it that way b/c I figure folks have not yet had the time or backing to implement these types of technologies in practical settings yet. But their time will come! There was a day when people thought the technology for HUDs was weird or useless; now, FireDepts talk about having these displays in thier trucks to help navigate and how incredibly helpful it is. Love this stuff! Quote
ZimZam Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 I used to be able to keep up w/ the latest technologies. Now I'm just baffled. Could you possibly explain what they are? But their time will come! No doubt. Thanks A. Quote
counterfeitfake Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 How is that working? Is there a projector underneath the translucent surface? And a computer with image recognition so it knows which shape was put down? Quote
archenemy Posted April 5, 2007 Author Posted April 5, 2007 Yes, as well as a bunch of snaffles running in a wheel inside the lightbox. Quote
counterfeitfake Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 snaffles with fiducial symbol tattoos Quote
archenemy Posted April 5, 2007 Author Posted April 5, 2007 who are sacrificed, roasted, and eaten when the project is done. Quote
archenemy Posted April 5, 2007 Author Posted April 5, 2007 you're fucking useless That must be a terrible feeling, don't you think? Makes me happy to be where I'm at--that's for sure! Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted April 5, 2007 Posted April 5, 2007 you're fucking useless As we all are. Speak for yourself. Actually, don't speak at all - STFU, nOOb. Quote
counterfeitfake Posted April 6, 2007 Posted April 6, 2007 So my buddy downloaded their open-source software package, and stunningly enough it actually works. He hooked it up to a webcam and held up pieces of paper in front of it. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted April 6, 2007 Posted April 6, 2007 So my buddy downloaded their open-source software package, and stunningly enough it actually works. He hooked it up to a webcam and held up pieces of paper in front of it. Open source rules! Spring, Hibernate, Tomcat, JBoss, Linix, MySql... yeah, baby! Quote
counterfeitfake Posted April 6, 2007 Posted April 6, 2007 The concept of Open Source does rule. My experience with most of the smaller (and some of the larger) projects is that they're poorly documented and totally broken out-of-the-box. So when I find something that breaks that expectation it's pretty exciting. Quote
foraker Posted April 6, 2007 Posted April 6, 2007 That's a very cool interface. I can think of several uses for that right off the bat. Couple that with the nifty desktop seen previously. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted April 6, 2007 Posted April 6, 2007 The concept of Open Source does rule. My experience with most of the smaller (and some of the larger) projects is that they're poorly documented and totally broken out-of-the-box. So when I find something that breaks that expectation it's pretty exciting. Yes, the documentation sucks. Best bet is to go with something that has some history and a Manning (or other good book) available. Of course the book will be out of date, and you have to google and do some trial and error to resolve issues. Infinitely better options than .NET... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.