Gary_Yngve Posted November 11, 2006 Posted November 11, 2006 yay or nay? http://www.nabr.org/ http://www.noaeta.com/ Personally, I'm for the AETA if it will get http://www.uwkillsanimals.com to stop spraying graffiti on or near campus. Maybe all the animal rights extremists can volunteer to be guinea pigs for new surgeons. A hundred years ago doctors switched to animals after it became unethical to train on poor people. Certainly someday surgical training will be all VR and simulated, but we're not there yet, and no doubt many animals will be killed in the process of getting there. Quote
chirp Posted November 11, 2006 Posted November 11, 2006 Prison overcrowding = potential solution. Quote
PBRstreetgang Posted November 11, 2006 Posted November 11, 2006 yea 25 to life for spraypainting seems fair and why do vegans like pictures of dead anials so much Quote
chirp Posted November 11, 2006 Posted November 11, 2006 yea 25 to life for spraypainting seems fair and why do vegans like pictures of dead anials so much 'Cause they know that in order to appeal to folks like you who can't spell they need to use "pitchers" Quote
archenemy Posted November 11, 2006 Posted November 11, 2006 yay or nay? http://www.nabr.org/ http://www.noaeta.com/ Personally, I'm for the AETA if it will get http://www.uwkillsanimals.com to stop spraying graffiti on or near campus. Maybe all the animal rights extremists can volunteer to be guinea pigs for new surgeons. A hundred years ago doctors switched to animals after it became unethical to train on poor people. Certainly someday surgical training will be all VR and simulated, but we're not there yet, and no doubt many animals will be killed in the process of getting there. Destroying other people's property is wrong and is already prosecuted under our current laws. I am not sure I understand why one group needs to be singled out and told they are not allowed to fuck with other people's stuff. I don't think animal activists are all so extreme. In the group you list, they talk about goals like not wanting the animal maternal deprivation studies to continue. I think this is reasonable, as I think a lot of the things they want to see stopped are reasonable. Their tactics may not be acceptable, but their hearts are in the right place. Quote
Mr_Phil Posted November 11, 2006 Posted November 11, 2006 Just like the abortion clinic bombers. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted November 11, 2006 Posted November 11, 2006 yay or nay? http://www.nabr.org/ http://www.noaeta.com/ Personally, I'm for the AETA if it will get http://www.uwkillsanimals.com to stop spraying graffiti on or near campus. Maybe all the animal rights extremists can volunteer to be guinea pigs for new surgeons. A hundred years ago doctors switched to animals after it became unethical to train on poor people. Certainly someday surgical training will be all VR and simulated, but we're not there yet, and no doubt many animals will be killed in the process of getting there. Destroying other people's property is wrong and is already prosecuted under our current laws. I am not sure I understand why one group needs to be singled out and told they are not allowed to fuck with other people's stuff. I don't think animal activists are all so extreme. In the group you list, they talk about goals like not wanting the animal maternal deprivation studies to continue. I think this is reasonable, as I think a lot of the things they want to see stopped are reasonable. Their tactics may not be acceptable, but their hearts are in the right place. so, you must be opposed to hate crime legislation... to be consistent Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.