Jump to content

Garmont "Tour" boots


johndavidjr

Recommended Posts

correction: "Tower" boots.

Nice, superlight mountaineering boot. Climbs rock relatively well & good in snow. Crampon straps seemed a tad uncomfortable at times, flatfooting on moderate ice, & is perhaps too light for lots of heavy ice climbing. But sole is fairly stiff & does have protective rubber rand. Seems nearly ideal for summer climbing & could even do volcanos. Weighs about same as Trango, but has Goretex liner. I wore them with superfeet for three moderate climbing days in Canada & a hellacious hike, and got no blisters, even with semi-soft feet. This boot definitely not for winter. Gave my Yukons to a truck driver in Calgary.

--

Edited by johndavidjr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Sadly, you are correct. The store in Canmore I think labeled them incorrectly as "Tour," but I may be wrong. Towers are now on sale for $159 at Mt. Gear. Man did I get ripped off, even given Canadian currency. The review you provided compares the boot unfavorably with rock climbing shoes for rock climbing. I'd say a 5.3 climb in rock shoes becomes a 5.4 or even maybe a 5.5 wearing these things... But for a mountaineering boot, they're superior rock climbers....

 

____

Edited by johndavidjr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd guess at this time of year the summer boots are being closed out for next year's models.

 

[by the way, I was looking at the deal mgear.com has on Tecnica T-Rock's ($199). I took a glacier class last month with a guy who had just bought a brand new pair from a shop for more than $300. Not sure if they are any good for people with wide toes and narrow heels]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, ratings don't relate to boots & of course I meant only subjective comment. These boots are great for rock compared to normal mountain footwear. They even look like the old Royal Robbins rock shoe of late 60s, and may climb nearly as well, which isn't saying much for RRs. I'm enthused.

 

Hey -- nice cruise to Olympus. Taking Towers there is far better than my old Maks.

---

Link to comment
Share on other sites

La Sportiva Thunder 2lbs 12oz

 

Trango S: 2lbs 10oz

 

Supernova: 2lbs 12 oz

 

Hell, my Salomon Pro Ice (which are technical climbing boots) only weight 4lbs.

 

I am taking issue with your reference to those as "superlight". If one wanted a superlight boot I think they could go a lot lighter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm==guess you're right. I'm comparing them almost soley with my old Makalus. They are much lighter.

 

Towers' actual weight is 3 lbs 2 oz for pair, or four ounces heavier, each, than Trangos. I would be afraid to buy Trangos because of uncertain reputation for slush hiking.

 

I must check out the others you mention. Isn't Garmont Ferrata slightly stiffer & heavier than Tower?

----

Edited by johndavidjr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just quoting the manufacturers figures.

I figured - some manufacturers are more "optimistic" than others in my experience. Mountain Gear claims 3lbs 2oz/pair which is consistent with how they feel to me - the pair ways about as much as a single one of my old mountain boots

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...