Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

It is a set of standards for fire rescue. Generally they are more stringent and more oriented towards higher static safety factors (15:1 I believe) edit: actually apparently the NFPA never actually says 15:1, but it is implied by some agencies...or something like that

Edited by iain
Posted

hey the summit of hood just popped up on my signature. how cool. BTW I am talking about the smaller ultrascenders as opposed to the bigg'ns.

Posted
IceIceBaby said:

mbcracken said:

Does anyone know what the difference between non-NFPA and NFPA? confused.gif -Mike

 

NFPA it is certification of the product for use for a rescue/life depending situations

cantfocus.gif

 

Thanks...

 

So, iain, why the smaller ones? Is it just for weight savings? I guess the question is then is the weight savings worth the smaller hand grip? Just curious why you're investigating the smaller ones.

 

-Mike

Posted

yeah that's the dilemma I'm in. I finally have succumbed to getting a pair for mtn rescue stuff but I don't want to pack in some monster things if I can't get a ride into somewhere, etc. So I thought these were a good compromise as they have worked out well for cavers, abusers of ascenders (but don't care about weight so much). I like the handles which the ushba minis don't have. I don't think they would work well w/ gloves though.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...