Jump to content

CMI small ultrascenders


iain

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

It is a set of standards for fire rescue. Generally they are more stringent and more oriented towards higher static safety factors (15:1 I believe) edit: actually apparently the NFPA never actually says 15:1, but it is implied by some agencies...or something like that

Edited by iain
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IceIceBaby said:

mbcracken said:

Does anyone know what the difference between non-NFPA and NFPA? confused.gif -Mike

 

NFPA it is certification of the product for use for a rescue/life depending situations

cantfocus.gif

 

Thanks...

 

So, iain, why the smaller ones? Is it just for weight savings? I guess the question is then is the weight savings worth the smaller hand grip? Just curious why you're investigating the smaller ones.

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah that's the dilemma I'm in. I finally have succumbed to getting a pair for mtn rescue stuff but I don't want to pack in some monster things if I can't get a ride into somewhere, etc. So I thought these were a good compromise as they have worked out well for cavers, abusers of ascenders (but don't care about weight so much). I like the handles which the ushba minis don't have. I don't think they would work well w/ gloves though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...