Jump to content

cj001f

Members
  • Posts

    8157
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by cj001f

  1. Kepler and Newton's concepts of motion and gravity are now known as LAWS. Are you proposing to give anthropogenic global warming the same stature?

     

    Why not? There's plenty of things known as laws describing anthropogenic processes most notably Godwins Law

  2. my point is that if EVERY bit counts... then exactly that. EVERY BIT. climbing at snoqualmie has impact...you can take that impact away by not going.

     

    unless it isn't that much of a dire situation. global warming, that is.

     

     

    So you'd like to see some Communistic solution to global warming where every person is treated exactly equal.

  3. What a load of shit.

     

    Remember the 3 Ds of Opposition chuck

    Disformation, Deny, Delay

     

    who's opposing, you assholes! give me a plan that works! I'm ready.

     

     

    And when the 3 Ds fail you jump to the solution phase and bitch about how nobody came up with a solution to the problem you said didn't exist (and therefore wouldn't fund any research into finding a solution)

     

    a technique versatile for voicing your opposition to problems ranging from Global Warming, Walmart, or that pesky jungle gym at the local park

  4. Thats true, but a person who shall remain nameless went and shoved a big fucking stick in the eye of some guy named Chavez. OOPS!!

     

    I'm sorry Hillary will fix all that within days of her inauguration. :grlaf:

     

    McCain had a chance, until he found Jesus

  5. Yeah, keep changing the subject of REAL debate. :rolleyes:

     

    Real Debate? That's the greatest delusion of all. Unskilled an unawares describes the cc.com conservative crew

     

    I am extraordinarily glad you guys take time from your economics/environmental sciene/political science professorial careers to educate me though.

  6. I am not sure where you are going with this.

     

    Great contribution to the dialogue, though. :tup:

     

    I figured we needed more condscension in on cascadeclimbers, not less.

     

    Seriously man, your ability to cut and paste from sources you find ideologically appealing is unparalelled, but it doesn't substantiate your specious opinions

  7. So agreeing with the scientific consensus, or at least differing to the judgments of those most qualified to evaluate the evidence, somehow constitutes a critique of the said consensus? 'kay.

     

    Weren't you the one mocking those not-practicing the art who profess differing opinions? Or did I just imagine your condescension?

     

    Opponents of Global Warming are fighting a rearguard action. It shows.

  8. "There is no doubt that mankind has influenced atmospheric concentrations of CO2, and that this will increase global temperatures.

     

    I don’t believe that the scientific data supports anything other than that an increase in CO2 will cause an increase in temperatures. The important scientific discussion centres on how much the temperatures will rise. Writing in The Guardian recently, the commentator George Monbiot ridiculed global warming deniers under the headline “Fossil Fools”. Such criticism is well founded."

     

    What aspect of the science is he criticizing here?

     

    Note bolding.

     

    He's also the guy who used increasing catches of fish to argue fish stocks are not in trouble :noway:

  9. Uh, Jay, Bjorn is one of those guys never trained as a scientist criticizing science that I thought you don't want to listen to.

     

    I guess that only applies to opinions you don't like, eh?

  10. i suppose you're right. maybe they should just power a bio-diesel generator with her liposuctioned "product"

     

    In related news stock in the Body Shop plunged 80% after they reported drastic shrotages of raw materials.

  11. Well no matter how many times you declare the Nobel Prize is lacking, you got to admit that it's got more cred than an Oscar or Golden Globe. :D

     

    It's funny listening to him talk about how vague and nebulous it is when he hasn't bothered to research who or why the prize is given out. That he doesn't like it is enough justification. :lmao:

×
×
  • Create New...