Jump to content

Jason_Martin

Members
  • Posts

    740
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Jason_Martin

  1. An anchor set to eliminate upward pull may be important in some cases and not so important in others.

     

    If the belayer is beneath a roof or some other obstacle where a leader fall will lift them into the obstacle, a piece set to eliminate this is very important.

     

    If the anchor is made primarily of stoppers, which can sometimes pop out with an upward pull, you may want to include a piece that elimates this.

     

    If there are two people hanging off the cordellette, the combined weight of the two climbers at the anchor can sometimes eliminate the need for an upward piece.

     

    If there is some variety in the anchor -- in other words, the anchor includes a couple cams -- and there is no danger of the belayer being injured by a leader fall, then it's not so important to add a piece that will eliminate an upward pull on the anchor.

     

    Jason

  2. If you could be a little more specific with your question, it might be easier to answer.

     

    At first it seems that your asking about an additional anchor to keep the danger of an upward pull due to a fall at bay. But then you talk about how tight things are. If you clarify, you'll get a better response.

     

    Jason

  3. I still find it amazing the arrogance and intolerance on this forum that equates a differing opinion with stupidity.

     

    I usually don't rant on this webpage, but the recent election makes my blood boil. So here it is, I'm going to rant for awhile and then I'm not going to write again on this thread. The people this pisses off will just have to attack me behind my back, because I don't even intend on looking at the thread again...

     

    I do believe that Bush's reelection was legitimate and perhaps that is why I'm so angry. I'm angry that people ARE too stupid to see through his propaganda and his lies.

     

    Equating a differing opinion and intollerance with stupidity...? Maybe I do...but I'm a little bit intollerant myself when it comes to what's happened to this country in the last few days.

     

    I think people who think the world is 6000 years old are stupid. There is no rational reason for people to believe this. It flys in the face of all science. Taking evolution out of text books is stupid...and so are the people who want to do it.

     

    I think people who are worried about what homosexuals do in their bedrooms and want to legislate who one may or may not legitimately love are stupid. Who cares? Get over it! People who say their not homosexual certainly spend a lot of time thinking about it...self loathing for homoerotic fantasies? Maybe. I don't know. But I do know that their bigotry is stupid and not an opinion.

     

    I think people who want to take a woman's right to choose away from her are stupid. Could we possibly get any closer to becoming Nazis?

     

    I think people who want to insert prayer into public schools are stupid. This actually UNDERCUTS the freedom of religion in this country. Students who do not partake in the dominate religion at a given school will be faced with it on a daily basis. Ultimately, this is a technique of conversion under the guise of something else instituted by the radical right.

     

    I think people who want to take money out of public education -- so that "No Child Left Behind" might be further underfunded -- are simply not paying attention. They might even be kind of stupid.

     

    I heard a joke wherein someone asked how you can tell a Republican on a pirate ship? He's the one wearing two eye patches.

     

    Open your eyes! GW brought us to war on false pretenses! How could you possibly support someone who does this? This is not a question of conservative, liberal, democrat or republican. We are fighting a war that was justified by calculated mistruths. There is still a percentage of this country that believes that Sadam was somehow behind September 11th... I have a feeling that the people who believe this don't have very high IQs. Indeed, they might even be kind of stupid!

     

    Theoretically conservatives like fiscal conservativism. What happened to that? Everyone knows the numbers...they have nothing to do with opinion. Those who have simply dropped their concerns about America's financial future because their party is in control are simply not thinking things through. They could be stupid.

     

    They called Kerry a liberal. People don't seem to remember what liberals have been responsible for in the past. Liberals freed the slaves even though back in those days liberals were Republicans. Liberals got women the vote. Liberals fought for civil rights. Liberals have fought for the homeless and those who live in near poverty. Liberals have fought to keep us out of unneeded wars. Liberals are the reason we have modern environmentalism. Liberals fight for teachers and for education. Liberals make the movies you watch and sing the songs you listen to.

     

    According to the Bush camp, Liberals are the stupid ones. The reason, because we know we can do better. We know it. And we know who the dumb ones are.

     

    So I guess I am an intollerant liberal...seems like an oxymoron, but there it is...

     

    People who voted for Bush are STUPID!!!!!

  4. Try education sometime.

     

    I recieved the following in an email from a friend:

     

    State Avg. IQ 2004

    1 Connecticut 113 Kerry

    2 Massachusetts 111 Kerry

    3 New Jersey 111 Kerry

    4 New York 109 Kerry

    5 Rhode Island 107 Kerry

    6 Hawaii 106 Kerry

    7 Maryland 105 Kerry

    8 New Hampshire 105 Kerry

    9 Illinois 104 Kerry

    10 Delaware 103 Kerry

    11 Minnesota 102 Kerry

    12 Vermont 102 Kerry

    13 Washington 102 Kerry

    14 California 101 Kerry

    15 Pennsylvania 101 Kerry

    16 Maine 100 Kerry

    17 Virginia 100 Bush

    18 Wisconsin 100 Kerry

    19 Colorado 99 Bush

    20 Iowa 99 Bush

    21 Michigan 99 Kerry

    22 Nevada 99 Bush

    23 Ohio 99 Bush

    24 Oregon 99 Kerry

    25 Alaska 98 Bush

    26 Florida 98 Bush

    27 Missouri 98 Bush

    28 Kansas 96 Bush

    29 Nebraska 95 Bush

    30 Arizona 94 Bush

    31 Indiana 94 Bush

    32 Tennessee 94 Bush

    33 North Carolina 93 Bush

    34 West Virginia 93 Bush

    35 Arkansas 92 Bush

    36 Georgia 92 Bush

    37 Kentucky 92 Bush

    38 New Mexico 92 Bush

    39 North Dakota 92 Bush

    40 Texas 92 Bush

    41 Alabama 90 Bush

    42 Louisiana 90 Bush

    43 Montana 90 Bush

    44 Oklahoma 90 Bush

    45 South Dakota 90 Bush

    46 South Carolina 89 Bush

    47 Wyoming 89 Bush

    48 Idaho 87 Bush

    49 Utah 87 Bush

    50 Mississippi 85 Bush

     

    The IQ numbers were originally attributed to the book "IQ and the Wealth of Nations", though they do not appear in the current edition. The tests and data were administered via the Raven's APT, and the The Test Agency, one of the UK's leading publishers and distributors of psychometric tests. This data has been published in the Economist and the St. Petersburg Times, though this does not mean it should be taken as fact. Though the data does correlate somewhat to IQ of students per state based on SAT/ACT data, though this would be biased for those that had completed a high school education. Someone has also taken 2000 census data on percentage of state residents that have earned a college degree and used that to compare the voting in the 2000 election, it's funny, but that seems to correlate as well.

  5. If someone came to the Northwest and said that he had to climb five routes and only five routes, these are the one's I'd recommend:

     

    1) Outerspace

    2) Dreamer

    3) N. Ridge of Stuart

    4) Northwest Face to North Ridge of Forbidden Peak

    5) North Face of Shuksan

     

    I think these routes are some of the best because of the sound rock, views, and quality climbing. They aren't necessarily the biggest or the hardest routes in the range, but I do think that they are all qualify as "must dos."

     

    Jason

  6. Don't Rap the route on Johnny Vegas. People get their ropes stuck on that route almost every day. Rap Solar Slab Gully.

     

    You can buy the Uriosite Guidebook at Desert Rock Sports in Las Vegas. The title of the book is, "The Red Rocks of Southern Nevada."

     

    Jason

  7. Last year Alex, Gene, Mark, and I all went out to Strobach mountain with these guys from Oregon Public Broadcasting and did a segment for their show on ice climbing. This particular segment is going to be shown on Thursday October 21st at 8:30 p.m. and then repeats on Sunday at 6:30 in the evening. It will be shown on Oregon Public Broadcasting. Eventually it will be shown on KCTS in Seattle, but the guy at OPB didn't know when.

     

    Jason

  8. i am stoked to see this movie tho.. Matt and Trey do know comedy. some of the best comedy-artists of the 20th century.

     

    Not even close! Like I said, I thought the movie was great up until the puppets get busy. But after that there are only a few parts which even came close to making me laugh hard. "I'm so Ronery" and the puking are great, but other than that, I only laughed a bit during the second half of the movie.

     

    If you want to really laugh hard, see "Napolean Dynamite" and "Sean of the Dead." Both of those movies are far far far funnier than "Team America."

     

    Jason

  9. One thing that has helped me out a bit is working with a well known climbing coach... I'm by no means a competition climber, but that doesn't negate the things that a coach has to offer.

     

    The advantage a coach has is that he or she is often able to see things that you are doing, that you don't realize you are doing. They help you with your technique as well and they know how to help you train without injury.

     

    A slightly cheaper alternative to a coach is one of the many training books out there. "How to Climb 5.12" or "Climbing for Peak Performance" or whatever else you might find can be helpful is you follow their training suggestions very closely.

     

    Good luck!

     

    Jason

  10. Hello All,

     

    I have recently been asked to write an article about Exit 38 and North Bend for a local newspaper. They are on a deadline and as such I'm interested in intervewing someone who goes there a lot (as in more than ten or fifteen times a year) today.

     

    If you fit these qualifications, please send me a PM or an email with your phone number and I'll give you a call.

     

    Thanks,

     

    Jason

  11. Most cultures define their god in such a way that their god always believes as they do. If they feel killing people and taking their land is appropriate, a given culture will redefine what their god believes in order for this to take place in a "moral" fashion.

     

    The perfect example is right before us. George W. says that god's on his side, but so does Osama. Millions of people on each side of this given conflict say the other side is wrong and that they're right.

     

    As such I believe that it is better to base one's moral code on humanism and not a belief that a given diety wants you to kill the other guy.

     

    Jason

  12. Don't forget to add Clinton to that list...and quite a few other democrat politicians. I think you know it's a little shortsighted to only list republicans as having been war avoiders (conscientious objectors, etc.).

     

    I thought this article written by Eric Alterman addressed this quite well:

     

     

     

    A taxonomy of positions on Vietnam:

     

    Category A: Exhibiting the strength of one’s moral convictions.

     

    Supported the war and served in Vietnam (John Kerry, John McCain)

     

    Opposed the war and served in Vietnam because it would have been unfair to force someone less fortunate to take one’s place (Al Gore)

     

    Opposed the war and dedicated oneself to anti-war movement at some personal risk, including conscientious objection. (This position is not as dangerous as serving in a war, but it is nevertheless just as moral. The war was evil. Putting oneself at legal and physical risk as many did to try to end this evil strikes me as an unimpeachable moral position, though given America’s political culture, it would also be untenable for any contemporary presidential candidate to hold.)

     

     

    Category B: Exhibiting the strength of one’s moral convictions after protecting one’s posterior.

     

    Opposed the war, protected self, and then worked for anti-war movement (Bill Clinton)

     

    This position seems to me to be the minimum necessary to consider oneself a moral being. Risking one’s person for one’s principles is a lot to ask for most of us, but the least one could ask is that if we identify an evil that is literally killing people, our peers included, one lifts a proverbial finger to stop it, say, by working for the presidential candidacies of Robert Kennedy, Eugene McCarthy or George McGovern.

     

     

    Category C: Having no convictions to protect save self-protection

     

    Opposed the war, protected self, let others worry about it (Howard Dean, Joe Lieberman)

     

    This is the position of those who merely opted out of the question, accepted their college deferments and went on with their lives and did not feel any sense of responsibility for their peers and countrymen.

     

     

    Category D: Contradicting one’s alleged convictions in the service of protecting one’s posterior

     

    Supported the war, preferred to let others fight and die for it (George W. Bush, Dick Cheney)

     

    This seems to me to be the least defensible position imaginable. Bush and Cheney both used their privileged positions to protect themselves; Cheney says he did it because he had “other priorities.” Bush says he did it because he wanted to “better himself” by learning to fly planes. Whether he deserted his post or not—and I think he did-- it is incontrovertible that he wasted the government’s million dollar investment in his training by allowing his qualifications to lapse while he was still supposed to be on active duty. (And what if during this period, the Guard was actually needed, if say, Oklahoma had invaded Texas?)

     

    One day, historians will attempt to explain just how two men who fall in category D somehow made the election about the moral rectitude of a man who fell into category A not once but twice. We have to admit this. This Rove feller really is a genius. Just when you thought the media couldn’t be any more irresponsible, he proved it had even more to give. (Most journalists today of the proper age, I imagine, fall into category B or C, with a significant number in D and a tiny, tiny minority in A.)

  13. This is the perfect time of year for ice climbing on the lower Coleman. You don't have to worry about crevasses or roped glacier travel because the glacier is dry. You don't even have to rappel down to the base of your routes most of the time. You can build a top-rope anchor and then walk around.

     

    You probably won't be able to use pickets because there is no snow for them. Instead screws will work well. The word of warning for this time of year is to watch your screws, they can melt out in the sun.

     

    To keep your screws in place longer you can put snow or ice chips on top of them. Another alternative is to top-rope off of V-threads which don't melt out in the late summer sun so easily.

     

    Be aware that the seracs on the right hand side of the glacier tend to be more stable than those in the middle or on the left. If the cliffs on the right side seem short to you, there are many crevasses which you could lower into and climb out of as well.

     

    Jason

  14. It's interesting when you travel abroad, a lot of non-american tourists are trying to visit Cuba BEFORE Castro dies. Why? The dude is seriously old and will probably go sometime in the next ten years. In addition to this, foriegn tourists believe that once Castro is gone, Cuba's going to turn into an alternate Hawaii for Americans... Which is probably true.

     

    Maybe it's time to go down there and to buy cheap beachfront property before the U.S. takes the country over and turns it into a resort.

     

    Jason

  15. The law is such that public schools must accomodate children with disabilities. So legally the school's hands are tied. They cannot exclude this child, but if this child is exposed to peanuts, the school will have a fatality on their hands.

     

    It is a rock and a hard place for the people who run the school.

     

    On the other hand, if this kid is so allergic that he could die from smelling someone's breath, then I believe the parents have a moral obligation to home school the kid until he is old enough to take care of himself.

     

    Jason

  16. This is a tall order. You might look online for condos that may be for rent.

     

    Otherwise, there are a few small hotels on the west side. I believe there is some type of "normal" Best Western type hotel on Sahara and Fort Apache. The Casino on that side of town, nearest Red Rock is the Suncoast. There is a Marriot type place next door. Within the next year or so there will be a casion/hotel ten minutes from the gates to RR called Red Rock Station.

     

    Jason

  17. Darren,

     

    I saw a video/slide presentation about some guys who descended the canyon. I think they just approached from the backside which you can get to by driving the willow springs road to the summit. A four wheel drive vehicle is required for this particular road. This is the "standard" approach for the routes on Bridge mountain.

     

    I don't think this particular canyoneering descent has been done very much, so be prepared to leave gear at rap stations.

     

    Jason

×
×
  • Create New...