shadow_man1

You know what you guys are fucked plain and simple. I am not paranoid in any fashion but you can see by the pictures again if they are real. that it could not have been a passenger jet of that size plain and simple. As for trolls that would be you dude you have said your only point is how did they match the WTC I have no idea but to say that an aircraft collided with a building and did not show any damage where the wings are is well nuts to say the least. Ask your oh so smart freind if he could do that gell thing for you again. As for the blast that you are talking about the buildings where standing but nothing was left inside or outside of the building nothing. Look again. And the buildings you are talking about where directly under the blast plain and simple. None of you have explained either the tree or the fuel or the wings or the fact that with out any damage to the outside of the building. How did it drag it's wings into the building with NO DAMAGE TO THE WALLS LOOK NO DRAG MARKS GOING INTO THE BUILDING. Um what they just folded up at the same lenght as the aircraft ? The fuel would have left huge burn marks and the glass would have melted. That building is designed to withstand a hit directly but a mere little plane punched right on threw four levels how ? It should have been toren apart and left peices of aircraft ripped and moulded into the rebar. OH blasts are very much controlled very much. Cause and effect are a normal thing in a blast. Thats why they know how or why a plane Lockerbie over the ocean blew up and where to look for the pieces ask a demo expert will ya he will explain the dynamics of a blast for you clearly. Please explain one of the three and you are right. Stop being an ass and saying I am paranoid again of what ? or trolling get a grip.

That being said, I can see the need to cover up a missile attack as opposed to a plane hijacking. It implies vastly different levels of security threat. Just for interest's sake, tell us, if you think it was a missile and not the missing plane, is America's response to this attack more or less than appropriate? Yes it was. Thats my point. Indeed the threat would have been far greater. And that would have put all of us in a state of global war.

Look again motyher fucker and you will see the tree and the hole and the FF. And in that spoof about the data LOOK AT WHERE THE WINGS ARE you can see them clearly they would be a hundred feet past the hole on either side. And the fuel is in the wings and the engines would have been blowen backwards as the wings started to fold. Come to think about it they where under throttle they would have shired off like a rocket because that is what they are. And I again have to ask why are their leaves on that tree the fuel would have acted like Napalm and burned them at an intense heat. Also how can windows with in the wing span not be blowen inward or completly destroyed. You are NOT talking about a cessna. The tree would have to be more then 300 hundred feet away from the building clearly it is not. The engines would also not be on the same side as in the photo and the cone on that is not big enough to be a cone on that engine wich I think is a GE engine. I worked at a airport and did push outs and a 757 is not a small plane it is huge ! As for the turbos and the whine that would only happen when they are excellarating and at that speed you would have to be in total controll to make it into the building. Ask anybody you want about the shock waves and how hard it would be to control that aircraft. If the photos of the building are real. Your smarter then that arent you ?

Your post is toooo funny. In the atomic blast the ONLY PLACE NOT DESTROYED IS DIRECTLY UNDER IT. Period. YOur history has proof! And there is reasons why. But if I drive a plane with wing span of over two hundred feet then I should at least leave a mark NO.

In the scheme of things yes. And where are the bodies ? Again one little thing the tree and the leaves look at the level of the hole and the height of the tree it had to be smaller then the width of the hole to make it past the tree !Or did it fly over the tree then swoop down and hit the building ? The tree and it's leaves do not lie. As for your insults how old are you.?

Did she see a 757 or what Explain the tree? If a helicopter hits a branch then the tree breaks are you going to tell me that a aircraft could penatrate that deep into a building designed to withstand outside forces could not break a little tree ? I could care less about witness it was at a point if histaria in your country. I'm sorry but if you can not explain a simple little thing like the leaves then what the hell ? The impact force of the plane alone should have ripped that tree out of the ground for sure. As for the bitch comment. Grow up man. Fuck you and your name are you one of those pinko commies maybe somebody should be talking to you. I problay support your troops twice the value you do. Oh bumbly gumbly I have been waiting for you what took so long ?

What ? Paranoid your say you come from the land of pinko commies? Paranoid I think you are. So that was all staged right / Paranoid of what ? I do not think the boggy man is coming but just explain the tree how about that? Just that alone will stop me in my tracks. I asked several times about three things. 1 the tree 2 the lack of fuel 3 the leaves Now any one of those would be fine. Oh as for your buddy who recreated the shot how come EVERYBODY say there had to be more then one bullet ! THATS EVERYBODY but your buddy. Also If you read you may want to have a look into a non fiction book called AN ACT OF TREASON. Why is it we have footage of the other planes and not this one ? And in the other footage you can clearly see the wings burst into flames but not this one? I have never said a thing to be insulted I find this to be quite amazing. I also have to ask you, you brilliant mother fucker where is the fuel tank on a 757 do you know ? Thats why the wing damage is important. Or lack of. As for Canadian insults stop now. It show how well you where brought up. FIND the WMD and you have my full support but untill then whom is paranoid ? Answer any one of them not because I think anything either way. Please no more insults. I enjoy this if you did not you would not be here ! You must be the paranoid one now your paranoid of me and the what if factor. Again was it staged ?

Alright then. Please explain the lack of wing damage and the lack of fuel and the lack of a huge hole. And how did the tree leaves not fall off ? And lets say you are 2' off the deck how did the tree( in the pictures)Not be burned beyond and how come it still stands straight up with all of it's branchs clearly not broken ? Tell me each one of those and your right. As for the alien who said anything about aliens come on look at JFK people still beleive Osweld did it. Not likley.

Alright then I already looked at that picture thats where I had trouble to start it still is not possible to fly that pig 2' off the deck and not take out a tree. Also look at the picture where the fire ball is and LOOK AT THE WINGS AND WHERE THEY ARE. Thast test run shows the wings and where they would be why is there no damage ?Timing well that is something that makes sense really. Lets say they where smart enough to have had a real plan. And at high noon the planes are to hit there target and you are to use a missile at your target makes sense. Or you are to fly your smaller aircraft into the building at that time. But not to have a mark at the base of the wall on impact how ? Also if you look at the height of the cockpit and then look at the height of the hole with the FF standing outside of it it's just about three feet taller would it not be like twenty ? and how did the tree leafs survie such a hit. No fire ball? with JET A fuel. If these are real pictures and what it said was real about the tapes and so on and to me it makes sense that people in the know arent going to be talking to anybody about it. I do not mean to push any buttons but with all the other lies and decete to all of you and others this is small pototoes. I removed the part about the towers because that just can not be true I hope. At the same time they did however have errors that being it at first is a 80 ton and at the end becomes a 60 ton. With no disrespect to anybody but if those pictures are real then what did hit it. I believe anybody who was in the pentagon would have been told not to talk to Anybody and they would be of a security clearence where as they would do just that NOT talk to anybody ANYBODY. If this is a set up like the moon walk which depicted everybody talking as if it never happened and then at the end you find out that it was all lies just to see how far we would beleive. Then well I'm a dumb ass. But if not then we are really in trouble. Thats why you should climb in the Alpine its allways full on histaria. Cheers

Ok please explain the lack of fuel and the lack of wings and how did they fly it 2' off the ground level ? Lets say the airplane is 100' long how far back would it have to be to be able to fly level at that speed ? I am also wondering about the poor souls where there ever any bodies found ? One other question how did the hole in the side of the wall happen with NO apparent damage to the ground nor the walls around. Also the window debry shows an outward force not inward and those shafts laying on the ground are not big enough to be the turbines of a engine that big. How does the size of the hole not go along with the size of the aircraft? If this is fake man did they do a good job. Cheers

The first shot that only shows a neat hole smaller then the size of the cock pit of a 757. and NO damage to either side on the walls and NO blast marks from the fuel. And the fact the ATC (not a belay plate) said it had the albility to correct itself at high speeds like a jet fighter. Thats all got to say something ? The blip on the radar would have also showen size and the numbers of the aircraft. I think it's not a 757 at all. How could it be if that photo of the hole and the wall are true. And to say you could not tell from a huge aircraft to a tiny one inside of a hundred feet come on. Thats like not being able to pick out a line on a wall with out binocs froma hundred feet away. Also if you have an aircraft that big flying with somebody who can not fly a cesna then how the hell did he make it to the pentagon without crashing into the ground from the upward forth of the shock waves you would have travelling at 500 miles per hour. Ask a fighter pilot its hard to stay stable twenty feet off the deck and they are pros. That vid scares me !

If the ones in the picture where able to hold a fall and the system was shock loaded then the head would break off from the shaft !!! To use them as a deadman is one thing and so is standing on the head shaft down but to use the pick end into a crack I think the head will break. Cheers

Hey how come if a canadian says it we get in trouble ? All we ever did was call him a moron. Geez thats a lot more like the truth at least as a moron he had an excuse. But now we can only hope he gets tried on war crimes. As he did take over a country with oh LIES now I get it. Do you not fear that idea you may be branded a anti bush which in turns makes you a anti A I can't say that as I am Canadian.

Would you like to buy a really good single wall tent ? I have a Garuda internal frame I could sell you ? Cheers

No. Not at all. I just thought that it would be about the only time people may get out of hand. But after thinking about it I realized how dumb ass of me People spray all the time. Thats it thats all Cheers

I think you should be allowed to speak as you want because if you do not like the channell then change it. It's that easy but to stop others from explaining in there own way of a climb and how it went is well censorship.