-
Posts
364 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Martlet
-
You sound kinda like JoshK, can you get banned for that, too?
-
I'm not sure what the technical answer would be. Do we know who did it, even? I haven't read the article yet.
-
Thanks, I will. You know you couldn't do it. You were talking out your ass again. Typical liberal moonbat....and so young. What a shame.
-
Can you give me some examples of using those figures to prove exact opposite points, please?
-
Ahhh, that makes you an expert. You should go back and read your textbooks again,then, because your ass is showing. I'm hardly an expert, but I obviously know more than you. It's apparent you don't, and that's obviously killing you. It's ok grasshoppa, you can admit you're wrong. Just go back and read the Articles again. It will sink in. I have faith in you. Ask your mom to help if you get stuck.
-
Re-read my post you moron. I addressed your very reply. I SAID I KNOW HE WAS IN A WAR ZONE. A WAR ZONE OF OUR OWN CREATION AND INABILITY TO DO WHAT WE SAID WE WOULD: BRING STABILITY. You don't know what the hell you are talking about, give it up. As AlpineK pointed out there is a reason none of the conservatives on here are backing up. I argue all the time with fairweather, GregW et al, and while we may be on totally opposites of the political spectrum, at least I am arguing with intelligent people who actually have a clue on world matters. Also, if you dont think "statistics" can be played to your advantage, go back to civics class. The state department is headed by a bush appointee and is there to conduct foreign affairs as the president sees fit. In other words, it's a political and partisan driven machine. I'll leave it to your brilliance to go figure out a million and one ways you can make various numbers show whatever you want. How the hell can you compare someone killed in a warzone to the statistics of reduced terrorism? Truly you can't be that stupid. Please tell me our public education system hasn't failed again. I guess there's at least "one child left behind". And yes, the state dept. makes up statistics. Those are all false. Time to tune your tinfoil hat, moonbat.
-
I haven't? Go back and read the posts on the geneva convention coverups then. Or go ask crazyjz how it felt to have his ass handed to him. Start posting factual information and I'll start worrying about earning your "respect". PS: You cry alot.
-
Ahhh, that makes you an expert. You should go back and read your textbooks again,then, because your ass is showing.
-
So, you're just typing for the hell of it. Ok. I won't bother to address those points, then. Except where you put words in my mouth. What I'm saying is that 3 days after a soldier reported the abuse, they went to press about it. That's not quite a "cover up".
-
yeah, lets ban everyone that I don't agree with. I have a better idea. How about we ban the morons that knowingly post lies? Cya JoshK
-
!! Yeah, I was laughing too! Isn't that good news! Can you honestly say you feel safer now as an American both domestically AND traveling abroad then you did 10 years ago? Fuck no. You are one ignorant son of a bitch. Why dont you go take a look at that article I just posted about poor Nick Berg. I'm sure if he was here he'd spit on you and the state department's distortion of statistics. And don't give me shit about how he was in a war zone. We created that war zone and we sent our citizens to fight there. Both he and the other private citizens there can't do their jobs safely since our mission to "liberate" Iraq has simply inflamed the whole region and cause their citizens to hate us even more. He was in Iraq, you moron. There is quite a difference between traveling abroad and working in a war zone. Are you so fucking stupid you can't tell the difference? Seriously. Are you really that dumb. Just because you don't LIKE the statistics, doesn't make them any less accurate. I don't care how you FEEL, those are the facts.
-
!! Yeah, I was laughing too! Isn't that good news!
-
Yeah, but he moved ahead of Kerry in the polls. With Bush's approval rating going down, Kerry should be killing him. It shows that the country thinks he sucks that much more.
-
Just curious what is one example? Or are you just repeating the (deceptive) Bush/Cheney ads? And even if you are right, as opposed to voting for a guy that you have watched in office for four years and know with certainty that he has continually distorted the truth AND has royally screwed our country? I think it's an easy choice, even if Kerry has committed the sin of actually talking to the public about what they want and vowing to do it. Empty promises versus obvious disregard for sound leadership decisions? I'll take the former. Scary unknown versus horrible known? I'll take the former. Yeah, things are pretty bad now. Unemployment rate dropping, economy picking up, terrorism at it's lowest point in 24 years. I don't know how we survive.
-
Nope. You have fun with a cricket bat. You have fun AT THE EXPENSE of a moonbat.
-
I didn't have to go to a "mutual friend" to get an opinion on you. I realized you were an ignorant moonbat from your first post. You should have had to ask either. I'd have told you I was a "flaming asshole".
-
Hey, you guys are coming up with the descriptions, I can't help it if you're lacking in geography.
-
Hey, which is it? Am I a young republican preppie piece of shit, or a gay wife beater wearing walmart hick? You can't be both.
-
No, I meant the wife beater shirts. You're really electable here in the souther hick states if you got one of them.
-
If by "we" you mean you liberal moonbats, yep, you certainly are.
-
More evidence that the moonbats need to stfu about "humiliating conduct" and let the military start offing these idiots.
-
Can they do that according to the Geneva Convention?
-
So does that mean you care quite a bit now, but you could care quite a bit less? Or, do you care less than before, but you could still care quite a bit less? Or perhaps you could care quite a bit less than before, but not necessarily? Could you still care less, or is there still some caring left in you? It's not that hard to follow. I realize they didn't teach logic in your GED classes, but borrow some from your mom for a sec. If I could care less, then read your link, and found that I then DID care less, then I couldn't possible care more at this point in time. I could, however, still probably care a little less. Post another link and let's find out.