KaskadskyjKozak

were omnivores, and we have developed a conscience through evolution, and we have the ability to choose. i disagree with your rationale conscience? about what? we'll all fry in 5 billion years when the sun turns to a red giant, so who cares if some damn chickens felt some transitory pain?

Tit for tat, Sir. Keep mocking the religious, and I'll mock the secular, especially for their ridiculous posturing about morality. I view positions held by liberals/secularists to be just as illogical and ridiculous as liberals/secularists view those of conservatives/religious people.

If we are animals, created exclusively by evolutionary processes, rather than in the image of God, then there is no need to "choose" not to eat animals. And there is no reason to worry about the "suffering" of animals, or that there is morality in anything we do to them. Predators hunt and kill prey. They don't worry about whether the victim suffers pain.

According to liberals, mass murderers commit crimes because of a genetic flaw, and gays are born that way. Choice does not come into the equation - it's all genetics. There's plenty of fodder to mock right there.

How many vegan nutballs will mock a creationist while denying that human evolution has produced an omnivorous species with canine teeth. But that's just the tip of the iceberg...

You guys work for evil, fascist corporations. The horror!

Arguments are so much more convincing when "fuck" is used at least once a sentence. Typical left-wing eloquence...

Liberalism is a mental illness.

Gee, I wonder what a german girl blogger would have written in Dresden circa 1944, had the internet existed at the time...

Be careful what you wish for. I am not so sure Hillary would be so easy to defeat. Yes, she is polarizing, but so was Bush.

What was that quote about governing a country with more types of cheese than days in the year?? :-)))

It's a metaphor. I see the same paranoid, delusional, irrational, conspiracy-theory infused, group-think from so many on the left that one often sees in cults.

keep sipping that kool-aid.

When the state is a corporation, that is called Communism, and that is the system of government preferred by people of your political leanings.

Well, I have the advantage in knowing who is (and you too) but hide behind my obscure nickname...

Focus on what? WTF is wrong with a little eye candy??

Si c'est quelle bonne en France, pour quoi habitez-vous ici? :-)

The corporations' involvement was a symptom of the illness, not the root cause of it.

That's exactly the issue. People who believe in marriage as a religious sacrament feel that applying the legal (civil) definition is just a stepping stone. Next the ACLU, gay activists, and the government will try to force churches to change their policies on marriage. Personally, I think it would help to change the name "marriage" to something like "civil union" on the legal/civil side of the equation, keeping it a state's right of course. I think the resistance to the issue would fall away much more quickly if this were done.

They've cut done most of them in the past decade, because (and this is serious), they were killing too many drunk drivers. Somehow, I am not surprised. :-( Perhaps a more enlightened view would be that the trees are serving the purpose of evolutionary processes...

You know why the French line their streets with trees? To provide shade for the German troops...

The excesses of the Nazi regime were enabled and fertilized by dehuminization of the German people through years of suffering imposed by war (WWI), and the victors' subsequent treatment of the vanquished (Treaty of Versailles). This analogy based on corporations and corporate power is bogus.

A liberal democrat by the name of Roosevelt did a hell of a lot worse than Bush - and to our own people - Japanese Americans.

Because redistribution of wealth and increased state-control of corporations are central tenets in the political ideology of our friends on the political left. Every time you hear about "working Americans" and "the rich" from a liberal's mouth, just substitude "proletariat" and "bourgeois", respectively, and you'll find the resemblance to the text of the Communist Mafifesto to be uncanny.

Keep drinking that Kool-Aid. No matter what happens in the next four years, Bush will be gone in 2008. We, unlike Nazi Germany or Communist Russian, have a presidential term-limit written in to our constitution, and that will not change.