KaskadskyjKozak

whatever - as if you have a clue as to what you are talking about.

I wasn't here. Sorry.

Check it out: http://www.politicalcompass.org/

CBS Enjoy the Kool-Aid!

some things don't translate well.

glassgowkist wrote his response in Polish. You likely will not find what he wrote in a dictionary.

Bil'she zhartuvaty ne treba. Ty brudna, nechesna osoba, "glassgowkiss", povna hnivom ta j zlym. han'ba tobi! Bida tvoyi sim'yi! Nekhaj Hospoda tebe pomyluye, bo tvoye serce temne. Ya shchyro ce kazhu. Bils'he svarytysya ne budu. Podumaj pro tvou povedinku, ta j slova...

My guess is that this guy likes to drown kittens for fun...

ne havkaj na mene, sobako. pishov ty k chortu z tvoyim zlym, hnivom, ta nekul'turnist'yu. ot i vse.

Your communist masters have trained you well - both philosophically (hatred of religion) and practically (means to justify your ends).

Well said.

CBS:

TS

More fodder for you all: http://www.danielpipes.org/article/2203

BTW, has anyone else noticed that Arafat's face closely resembles a camel's ass? Just wondering...

Also, Sharon has recently ordered that Israeli settlers in the Gaza strip must abandon their settlements. That's two good developments for that conflict in one short week.

Go for it - have a circle-jerk with like-minded people. You'll never need to feel threatened - or have to think.

Yes.

That is *your* appraisal, which I can respect, but disagree with. Can I assume that you would feel *some* war is worth fighting for, even though war is inherently an "abomination"?

<irony> You must be a religious fanatical nut from a red state! </irony>

I'm not arguing the question of whether we should have gone to war in Iraq or not (did I ever on this forum?). What I'd like to see is to reduce the insurgency to a level where we can, in good faith, hand over power to the Iraqis, and withdraw most of our troops over the next year (like 75%).

I don't think any of our wars in the past 70 years has gone "well"; why should this one be any different?

What do you consider worth fighting for? Anything? All the abominations of war would accompany the defense of your own homeland. Would that be a battle to be fought? Is it moral to allow for millions to die, while you stand on the sidelines in your purist moral rectitude? If a man pulls an assualt rifle and aims it at a crowd, do you have a right to kill him? Can you knowlingly kill 100,000 to save 1,000,000? Not my point, Sir. I merely assert that our troops are doing their damned best to minimize loss of innocent life. If we really had no concern for innocent civilians we could conduct this war on insurgency / occupation in much more brutal ways.

We have not been invaded since the war of 1812. All our subsequent wars have been "elective". All have cost lives on both sides. All have been controversial.