Jump to content

glassgowkiss

Members
  • Posts

    4062
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by glassgowkiss

  1.  

    Isn't that what we have now? An administration advocating suspending due process to disarm civilians while telling them what to think.

    answer: no :)

     

    Hitler, eh?

     

    Assholekisser, where's your apology for Carter? Oh yeah, silence? You fascist fuck!

     

    Last time I checked President sitting in the office in 1987 was Reagan. So WHAT THE FUCK are you talking about? If you expect for me to apologize for something that happened long before I have moved here, you are one dumb retard.

  2. dunno, the trump's setting that particuliar bar pretty high these days, no?

     

    holy sheeit, is he like, the gay love child of george wallace and barry goldwater, possibly wet-nursed by moe, larry n' curly? :)

     

    I was gone for four days and come back to the most ridiculous spew in a while. I mean, true, we always have assholekisser's idiocy. I guess you are right though - a dose of Trumpisms plus Chode-licker and Spray has taken a death spiral to new lows.

     

    Fuck I hope this rain doesn't wash too much snow in the mountains. Freshies!!

     

    Hey asswipe, how come you are not apologizing for what Trump is saying? After all, you are responsible for his words and actions. He is clearly advocating for fascist dictatorship. So that makes you for fascist dictatorship.

  3. Here's what gave rise to the fundamentalists: 454 cubic inches of Detroit Muscle!! Dual Quad carburetors, four on the floor, and a positraction rear end. This baby passes everything but a gas station. A gas station with gas refined from cheap Saudi oil. Saudi Arabia, that is, the single most fucked up fundamentalist regime in the world. Rocking it in F-16s. Leading the world in beheadings.

     

    Pretty much sums it up. Ibn Saud established a policy of ruthlessly killing any opposition inside his territory, but supporting subversive movements outside. Yes, the entire insanity is financed by Saudis, hence replacing oil based economy would pretty much cut off funding for the terror groups.

  4.  

    The democrat party has a problem on their hands, no one believes global warming causes terrorism.

     

    QED, you are wrong, since you accuse at least one person of thinking so :crazy:

     

    the causes of terrorism are necessarily complex - generally high stress-levels in society is clearly a major cause, and economic conditions in a community too, and both of these are easily effected by climate, whether you care to notice it or not.

     

    Fair enough, someone believes in the spaghetti god too.

     

    Civil war in Syria started after a prolonged drought, and people moving to the cities, unable to provide for their families. Actually, the climate was the catalyst for the situation.

  5.  

    conducted by an organization with an identifiable chain of command or conspiratorial cell structure (whose members wear no uniform or identifying insignia) and

    perpetrated by a subnational group or non-state entity.[20]

     

    [20] Bruce Hoffman, Inside terrorism, 2 ed., Columbia University Press, 2006, p. 41.

     

    So Unibomber was not a terrorist?

  6. The only way to a real, long term solution is a radical redrawing borders in the region. And second, (actually more important) would be developing technologies allowing a complete eradication of dependence on oil, which is the money source and fuel for the entire insanity happening in that part of the world.

  7. G Kiss, i'm sure you're much more educated and traveled than Dr. Dawkins. Please tell me how he's wrong for saying Islam is evil?

    if you're an atheist, can you really call anything evil w/o a touch of irony? all we got is double-plus un-good :)

     

    Amen (irony intended). This post and another of yours exemplify what I like you.

     

    Spare us your feltching and santorum.

    BTW Dawkins is a prime example of a person going from science to entertainment and branching into pseudo philosophy in his book writing. He is a biologist by trade, so his opinion about islam is just that. The counter to that can be opinion by Reza Aslan, who has actually has educational credentials to back up his statements. Sorry, but your first statement is just blanket bigotry at it's best.

     

  8. Only your reply of showing radical Christians isn't apples to apples. The jesus freaks you show aren't even statistically significant.

     

    The Muslims in the above video are a dime a dozen and they're fucking serious. In fact there's more than a billion of them.

     

    CWC01 is right, ISIS is a problem and the entire religion of Islam is a problem.

     

    Tvash is right when he says we need to turn ISIS into a grease spot.

     

    As for France, they're a bunch of cheese eating surrender monkeys that already gave their Nation away by letting so many Muslims immigrate. Then none of the European couples are having kids and the Muslims are having 8. I've read that by the year 2040 there will be more Muslims in France than French.

     

    Then Sharia Law will be introduced and you'll hear the prayers broadcast from loudspeakers five times a day....in Paris.

     

    FRANCE WILL BE AN ISLAMIC STATE BY 2050!!!!!

     

    Every time someone says the terrorists are a minority and most of Islam is peaceful I just cringe.

     

    I spent years of my adult life in the middle east, this isn't my cnn opinion.

     

    what a load of shit post. So you have spent some time in the middle east- where the fuck exactly? you seem like to total clueless fuck and a complete retard not understanding what you see and hear. the biggest number of people believing in koran is Indonesia. totally working democracy btw, who elected 3 female prime ministers. another big (over 300 millions) country with majority muslim population is pakistan. if you compare the numbers, actually arabs are in minority. this is not islam problem, it's a fucking arab problem, and particularly saudi/qatar problem. these are the fucks financing this bullshit. and till we stop treating saudis as allays and start treating them as our enemy #1, this shit will continue.

  9.  

    obama prominently campaigned on leaving iraq and won overwhelmingly - the democratic sentiment of the nation, which you are free to dislike, clearly was we needed to get the fuck out of that shitty little sandbox

     

    So Obama made good on his promise to fuck up Iraq. Well, OK.

     

    US leaving Iraq was decided during Bush administration, long before Obama took office. Stop lying!

  10. The funny part is you're serious.

     

    There is nothing funny about people dying, asshole. I have several family members living in Paris. But people like you are part of the problem, not the solution. Not only you lack education, but you lack basic manners and respect.

  11. .

     

    No caliphate, no ISIS. We'll still have Al Qaeda et al (who is nearly at war with ISIS themselves), but it'll be a while before Islamicists attempt this level of bullshit to promote their cult brand, if for no other reason than the most raging assholes among them will be deader than fuck.

     

    /quote]

     

    That is not true. ISIS is not at war with Al Qaeda.

    Here is a very comprehensive explanation about the relationship, between the two:

    Read

     

  12. Lets talk about stoopid parties; unrestrained immigration for the "feelz" brought this bombing to the socialist's utopia. Good job!

     

    You realize these were people born and raised in France, right? Your logic would be on parr with blaming English or Irish for McVeigh or Nichols bombing in Oklahoma. Shit, they were Christians too.

  13. Someone doesn't pay attention...Iraq asked the US to leave once they had a functional (corrupt) government. Syrian civil war sprang from the much lauded Arab-Spring. Obama effectively snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. A little bit of leadership could have prevented all of this but we have an executive branch that is only interested in itself and polling numbers. Hell, our own secretary of state couldn't tell the truth about what was and what wasn't a terrorist attack. No, the left isn't exactly known for its international policy strength...you get to own it now. Nice try.

     

    Lets talk about stoopid parties; unrestrained immigration for the "feelz" brought this bombing to the socialist's utopia. Good job!

     

     

    Well, it's obvious you know two things about the area- jack and shit. You really do not know any facts, nor the history and how things unfolded. Brainwashed by faux "news"?

    Here are some quotes to straighten a pile of lies you just wrote:

    "A December 13, 2006 cable, "Influencing the SARG [syrian government] in the End of 2006,"1 indicates that, as far back as 2006 - five years before "Arab Spring" protests in Syria - destabilizing the Syrian government was a central motivation of US policy. The author of the cable was William Roebuck, at the time chargé d'affaires at the US embassy in Damascus. The cable outlines strategies for destabilizing the Syrian government. In his summary of the cable, Roebuck wrote:

     

    We believe Bashar's weaknesses are in how he chooses to react to looming issues, both perceived and real, such as the conflict between economic reform steps (however limited) and entrenched, corrupt forces, the Kurdish question, and the potential threat to the regime from the increasing presence of transiting Islamist extremists. This cable summarizes our assessment of these vulnerabilities and suggests that there may be actions, statements, and signals that the USG can send that will improve the likelihood of such opportunities arising."

     

    Here some other facts:

    "In public the US was in favor of economic reform, but in private the US saw conflict between economic reform and "entrenched, corrupt forces" as an "opportunity." In public, the US was opposed to "Islamist extremists" everywhere; but in private it saw the "potential threat to the regime from the increasing presence of transiting Islamist extremists" as an "opportunity" that the US should take action to try to increase."

     

    Here is another US cable:

    This cable summarizes a March 15 meeting including then US counter-terrorism adviser John Brennan and US ambassador to Saudi Arabia Ford Fraker with Prince Muqrin bin Abdulaziz al-Saud, the head of Saudi Arabia's external intelligence agency. Ambassador Fraker's summary recounted:

     

    7. © PERSIAN MEDDLING: Prince Muqrin described Iran as "all over the place now." The "Shiite crescent is becoming a full moon," encompassing Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Bahrain, Kuwait and

    Yemen among Iran's targets. In the Kingdom, he said "we have problems in Medina and Eastern Province." When asked if he saw Iran's hand in last month's Medina Riots (reftels), he strongly affirmed his belief that they were "definitely" Iranian supported. (Comment: Muqrin's view was not necessarily supported by post's Saudi Shi'a shia sources.) Muqrin bluntly stated "Iran is becoming a pain in the ..." and he expressed hope the President "can get them straight, or straighten them out."

     

    You realize that during 2006 Bush was the president, right? So wtf are you even talking about?

  14. Unfortunately Assholekisser, all I hear out of your gobble trap is a lot of gobbling, cum farts and (to add insult to injury) a complete misunderstanding of how the world works.

     

    What do you expect from a product of Stalinist propaganda which he was spoon fed from birth along with copious amounts of Russian jizz. The poor brain-addled fucktard should only be pitied - he is beyond hope, yet alone recovery.

     

    Said by californian pretending to be someone else. I have heard you and Sam Feltchy are sporting good santorum.

  15. If you're so concerned with methane assholekisser, then why do you open your gobbling mouth?

     

    Obviously you are not concerned with wasting tax money on state corporate sponsorships, and obviously you are not concerned with a quality of your drinking water. Here is newsflash- you should have been more concerned with huffing glue out of that paper bag- it shows now for sure.

  16. I agree Oly.

     

    There should be plenty of money to ensure costs are covered.

     

    So Jim I checked out your link and do wonder what you think about foxes prior claims regarding breast cancer:

     

    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/experts-fracking-critics-bad-science-161628123--finance.html

     

    Or how he represented flaming faucets

     

     

    And this is typical of people on the right- dilute the argument with shit. The fact is these companies moved in, extracted gas, now they are walking away, leaving clean up costs to taxpayers. And who gives a flying fuck what science was used, when we are talking a very specific issue. These wells need to be sealed, because other wise they will pollute, and the clean up costs would be much higher. The fact is mining industry acts with zero accountability in every type of extraction, leaving tax payers with astronomical costs of cleanups. And this is exactly what socialism is- split the profits between a few chosen cronies, and fuck the general public.

×
×
  • Create New...