Just for fun....
Why accuse Bush of lying when some guy responsible for military propaganda blew the thing out of proportion? I find it hard to believe that Bush would have know everything about the attack when (if) he made such a statement. More likely, I can see him being told by some anonymous messenger
"This is Lynch, she was ambushed, fought back, etc, etc. Congratulate her, it's good PR."
Seems pretty unlikely that he would go through verifying EVERYTHING before making a short statement, he's got better things to do. It's politics, for God's sake.
Then again, I can't vote, so you should probably ignore me.