j_b

nobody knows?

really, you beat them every day. You live up to your nasty reputation, Attila.

what kind of moronic question is that? How often do you beat them, Attila?

*crickets*

do you beat your wife and daughter every night or just on weekends?

we are really fucked if our only hope is to change the budget by passing pot legislation in 2 years from now.

What would call someone who believes that the only alternative to unfettered capitalsim is state capitalism? What would you call someone who systematically denies the social contract and the role of governmental institutions? etc ..

A true libertarian would NEVER have voted for that deficit whoring chickenhawk. 99% of self-declared libertarians voted for him.

ya, supporting torture, murder, etc is so patriotic. Fuckwit. which liberal victories?

Attila? he is a manipulative hypocrite and you are fucking delusional.

poor dear, such a difficult choice and he ended up supporting his country, awww. Moron.

What were KKK's most oft-used handles at the beginning here?

so, what are your chances of succeeding getting these reforms in place anytime soon?

I don't disagree with you but it isn't mutually exclusive with taxing the wealthy at the state level, on the contrary in fact.

Legalizing marijuana (and taxing it) is just one vote away -- just as possible (theoretically) as an income tax. is there one on the ballot? what are its chances of passing compared to the state income tax on the wealthy?

come on, you are asking us to wait for Washington to do something. That won't happen.

well, by cutting spending in other areas that Tvash has called out, such as the vast waste of money we spend on the "war on drugs" because you think the people who need support now, can wait for you to kill the war on drugs? I thought I was the dreamer around here!

ya, the greatest crisis since the great depression and "libruls" should be asking for fiscal responsibility? ROTFL

how are you going to help the poor if you don't increase revenue?

The issue is not cutting programs, it's funding more of them, which explains the need to tax the wealthy.

If your concern really is that the ship is sinking for a whole class of people condemned by regressives to paying the cost of this crisis, I fail to see how not getting more revenues from the wealthy is going to help.

well, that's nice but it doesn't justify not taxing the rich at the state level if the fed gov. won't do it and Republicans prevent the flow of bail out funds to states.

right, where is the comparison between these deals and the budget shortfall. Belt tightening should occur but it likely doesn't really impact the need for greater revenue for a whole bunch of programs beside cops and fat cats at metro.

You have no choice but to make him do it. Whining about others making their employers do it is surely not the way to get there. Damn, do you have a vagina? Who's whining about anybody else? I just wish MY employer kept up with inflation. I can see at least a few whining about it, which explains that I assumed you were whining too. Sorry about that.

You have no choice but to make him do it. Whining about others making their employers do it is surely not the way to get there.