sexual_chocolate

wow, that looks friggin' fun.

Is Drury Falls a reasonable solo? Are there stances and such liberally scattered up the thing? Has it been soloed before? and, is it in condition right now? no not thinking of soloing it, but thinking of climbing it in the next few days.

but having said that! i hope everyone's dreams work out for them just the way they want them to!

i have friends who work from home, and the idealized vision of "working from the mountains!" doesn't pan out quite as expected. Who wants to drag their laptop to the crags with them? Unless it's checking on a few things here and there....

King Rama IX of Thailand, since 1946

thank you kevin for the props i really appreciate it, but you're starting to act like a stalker now, and i think that's in another thread. don't make me call my body guard.

Arch...I dont assume she is dumb. This might make one think you assumed she's dumb: I saw an interview with her once...to my suprise, she did not appear to be dumb as well as Way hot. I dont care if she is dumb....she is smoking. So please, stop being dumb. Its a turnoff. it's been shown reasoning doesn't work. Just flash him your tits.

Let's get something straight here, little guy....

with one more year of these receivers playing with hasselbeck, they'll be scary (if they get a solid line). they also HAVE to have more size on the defensive line. 270 vs. 330 doesn't work for an entire game hells no.

who could put a price on something so cute?

craigslist.org probly worth a check, vancouver.

the evolution of awareness and its attendant conceptual frameworks is an endless source of fascination for me, but who is it that is aware, and who is it that is fascinated? could this question even be entertained without the evolution of our collective consciousness and its effects on the "individual"? what is the "individual" in this context? the sun glints on three day old snow on a neighbor's roof-line, lifting the universe out of itself again.

i love to sing. what's your point?

When was I whining bro? Dont you mean I was Winning? Because....Im a winner! As far being an "overbearing young lad who started posting like mad with idiotic inflammatory opining in every thread" Pot..meet kettle,kettle meet...pot! Get my drift! first of all, i'm like 69.5 years old, and secondly, what color is the kettle? thought so.

maybe he knows you're leaving him and he's pissed? a friend's cat will piss on her bed when she leaves him for more than a day, then ignore her for a day when she comes home....

bill, it really isn't about "helping" or not, it's about the behaviour of an overbearing young lad who started posting like mad with idiotic inflammatory opining in every thread, etc etc. i don't really give a damn, but when he starts whining about being mistreated, well, i can't help but crack a smile! i'm sure he might be a nice enough pup in person, but he sure is a bit irritating here, at times (i must qualify).

do you personally favor a creationist explanation for the life forms we see on earth? As far as evolution goes, i'm not aware of any "evolutionists" who claim to know exactly what the animating principle, the impetus, behind the evolutionary process is. you can call it "god" if it makes you feel better! and, darwin wasn't an atheist. i don't think he really even wanted to see what he was seeing: the ramifications were distressing for him. i don't think it was a coincidence that he suffered from panic attacks, unable to leave his residence for much of his later life; post tramautic stress disorder! anyways, point is that not all evolutionists are atheists (but most certainly aren't creationists!)

have to have faith in something? haha. you still haven't responded to olyclimber back on page 3 or something. i'm out.

You're attempted pickup did not go unoticed, though you already admitted previously that you don't have hair on the shaft, so I'm not gonna stick around to find out the hard way. why why why are you so averse to hair transplants? it looks natural!

did you know the bonobos initiate sex on the average of once every 1.5 hours?

oh my god, i have hair growing on my penile shaft!

reason over ridicule. i think ridicule is only ever needed when one doesn't have a firm grasp of one's own understanding. ...says the ridicule'er you're right, my apologies. In other words, sans ridicule, i think you made the word "proof" meaningless by ascribing it to situations where the variables in the equation had no quantifiable locus, beyond rhetoric.

reason over ridicule. i think ridicule is only ever needed when one doesn't have a firm grasp of one's own understanding.

i suppose i could call a self-eating watermelon a snaffle-hound too, but that really wouldn't make much sense without a rectal thermometer.

haughty! i don't think "science" is simply an attempt to "model" the "world", using numerical and conceptual language; it's also the simple act of observation, and noting patterns and such, and noting how one observable event leads to another etc etc, very pre-lingual. i think the capacity for this in its most rudimentary level is an inborn capacity, notable in our animal brethren also. with our ability to abstract through the use of symbols, and develop a conceptual web at times entirely divorced from "observable" verification, i think "science" then can reach dangerously close to the very attributes of "religion" that it at times purports to revile. plus there's always the possibility that one will, in a naive and blind-faith manner, cling to "science" in an infantile manner, simply touting one's faith without a deep understanding of what "science" really is. this prejudice is easily noted in our society, and certainly here on this bb?