JayB Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 Considering the Salomon Scarlet for my wife, but not sure if the 154 or 164 would be the better size. Ski Dimensions are: 154: 130/90/122 164: 130/94/123 Wife's dimensions are 5 four and a half, ~120-125 lbs. I'd classify her skill level as advanced intermediate at this point. Recommendations for other women's all mountain fat skis (especially those that behave well on hardpack) would be welcome. Many thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon Posted February 4, 2008 Share Posted February 4, 2008 http://www.volkl.com/ski/attiva_aura.html Considering this one for the GF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh Conway Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 for a true powder board fatter would likely be better. length wise perhaps the shorter, depending on agressiveness? some of the K2s - Phat Luv or whatever? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nkane Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 Ed'sPans tried out the Aura's at Meadows last week and LOVED them. She wound up ordering some Fischer Rangi's based on her experience. There was a really good deal on them at spadout last week, <$200, but they may be all gone now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayB Posted February 11, 2008 Author Share Posted February 11, 2008 Decided to go with the 154's in the Scarlets since we found a pair of those for ~$250. Will report back after the Mammoth trip in a couple of weeks. Thanks for the feedback. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.