Jim Posted April 26, 2005 Posted April 26, 2005 Interesting insert into the budget this year: The proposal, spelled out in three short sentences, would give the president the power to appoint an eight-member panel called the "Sunset Commission," which would systematically review federal programs every ten years and decide whether they should be eliminated. Any programs that are not "producing results," in the eyes of the commission, would "automatically terminate unless the Congress took action to continue them." The administration portrays the commission as a well-intentioned effort to make sure that federal agencies are actually doing their job. "We just think it makes sense," says Clay Johnson, deputy director for management at the Office of Management and Budget, which crafted the provision. "The goal isn't to get rid of a program -- it's to make it work better." In practice, however, the commission would enable the Bush administration to achieve what Ronald Reagan only dreamed of: the end of government regulation as we know it. With a simple vote of five commissioners -- many of them likely to be lobbyists and executives from major corporations currently subject to federal oversight -- the president could terminate any program or agency he dislikes. No more Environmental Protection Agency. No more Food and Drug Administration. No more Securities and Exchange Commission. "Ronald Reagan once observed, 'The closest thing to immortality on this earth is a federal government program,' " says Rep. Kevin Brady, a Republican from Texas who has been working for the past nine years to establish a sunset commission. "We need it to clear out the deadwood." Without many of those programs, however, American consumers, workers and investors would be left to the mercy of business. "This is potentially devastating," says Wesley Warren, who served as a senior OMB official in the Clinton administration. "In short order, this could knock out protections that have been built up over a generation." Others note that the provision goes beyond anything attempted by conservatives in the past. "When you look at this," says Marchant Wentworth, a lobbyist for the Union of Concerned Scientists, "it's almost like the Reagan administration was a trial run." http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/sto...ion=6.0.12.1040 Quote
foraker Posted April 26, 2005 Posted April 26, 2005 They should clear out the dead wood, but only through a highly visible public process.....called Congress. Quote
stinkybritches Posted April 26, 2005 Posted April 26, 2005 I agree with the republicans that we should put federal programs under the microscope. I also agree that less government in my life is a great thing. The only problem I see is that they have different prioritys than I.First we cut corporate tax breaks,because if they cant make it without the government then they just cant make it.Also cut the farmer and rancher subs out.This is a capitalist society not socialist.Another would be to make relegious orgs. pay taxes just like every other buisness.Thats just my opinion. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.