catbirdseat Posted January 14, 2004 Posted January 14, 2004 Wrlwind, if you are thinking we should repeal Prohibition, that was done already. Maybe what we need now is an amendment protecting the right to smoke pot. Quote
murraysovereign Posted January 14, 2004 Posted January 14, 2004 Maybe what we need now is an amendment protecting the right to smoke pot. You're welcome to borrow ours, as soon as we get it up and running. It should be showing up in the next few months, if all goes smoothly. Ummm...anyone remember what we were talking about? Quote
marylou Posted January 14, 2004 Posted January 14, 2004 But the craazy Canucks think gay marriage is okay, and gay deevorce is.....still illegal. Whoopsie! Quote
HRoark Posted January 14, 2004 Author Posted January 14, 2004 the constution needs reviseing.. Nice general statement, care to follow it up with an actual thought about what you would like to revise? (And it's C-O-N-S-T-I-T-U-T-I-O-N) Quote
allthumbs Posted January 14, 2004 Posted January 14, 2004 The constitution is just fine the way it is. If you don't like the way it's written, move your commie ass's outta the U.S. Quote
catbirdseat Posted January 14, 2004 Posted January 14, 2004 General statements are considered safe. Without facts, there is little to challenge and all is opinion. Quote
HRoark Posted January 14, 2004 Author Posted January 14, 2004 General statements are considered safe. Without facts, there is little to challenge and all is opinion. That statement, in particular, carries no message and adds nothing to the discussion. Such a statement can neither be refuted nor defended. Bring something concrete to the table and let's chat. Quote
allthumbs Posted January 14, 2004 Posted January 14, 2004 I'll give ya something concrete, beyotch. Stick out your dick and I'll drop a brick on the little fucker. Kiss my ass. Quote
lI1|1! Posted January 14, 2004 Posted January 14, 2004 some threads jumb the shark. in spray they just run out of steam. trask is a butch dyke trapped in a redneck's body. Quote
HRoark Posted January 14, 2004 Author Posted January 14, 2004 trask is a butch dyke trapped in a redneck's body. Is that why he gets off watching himself naked? Quote
lI1|1! Posted January 14, 2004 Posted January 14, 2004 trask is a butch dyke trapped in a redneck's body. Is that why he gets off watching himself naked? your statement is illogical. why would a butch dyke like to look at a redneck's body? duh? unless of course trask really does get off looking at himself, which would mean the butch dyke inside him is unable to come to terms with her own heterosexuality. sad. Quote
minx Posted January 14, 2004 Posted January 14, 2004 hey this was actually an interesting thread until the topic of trask's body came up. Quote
HRoark Posted January 14, 2004 Author Posted January 14, 2004 hey this was actually an interesting thread until the topic of trask's body came up. Quit bitchin', you're the moderator. Quote
allthumbs Posted January 14, 2004 Posted January 14, 2004 you pilgrims sure have a short attention span Quote
catbirdseat Posted January 14, 2004 Posted January 14, 2004 The patriotism theme has sort of played out, but the topic of the Constitution has possibilities. I don't have any specific wish that it be amended. I just want to say that I believe the founding fathers apparently intended for it to be very difficult to amend by requiring ratification by 3/4 of the state legislatures. Notwithstanding, it has been amended 17 times since the Bill of Rights (the first 10). The most fertile ground for discussion, I believe is interpretation of the Constitution. Conservative jurists tend to interpret the document as they believe was the intent of the authors, whereas more liberal jurists treat it as a living document which is modified by precendent, current law, etc. Judge Robert Bork, who was nominated for the US Supreme Courst, was of the former persuation. He was considered so extreme in his views by the then democratic majority in Congress that his nomination was not confirmed. The term "Borked" then entered our lexicon. Currently, we have a row over confirmation of some very conservative judges nominated by Bush ( Miguel Estrada , for example, withdrawn in September). The dems consider them so extreme in their views that they are willing to fillibuster in order to prevent confirmation from coming to a vote. Quote
minx Posted January 14, 2004 Posted January 14, 2004 hey this was actually an interesting thread until the topic of trask's body came up. Quit bitchin', you're the moderator. please refer to the post which includes my guidelines for moderation Quote
Doctorb Posted January 14, 2004 Posted January 14, 2004 Nothing says "I love you America" like patronizing a prostitute. Rough him up a little bit too, the filthy slut. Quote
catbirdseat Posted January 14, 2004 Posted January 14, 2004 I guess you guys really decided it was time for this thread to come to an end. Homosexual photos are the surest way to get the job done. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.