Jump to content

j_b

Members
  • Posts

    7623
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by j_b

  1. Prescient 2004 article from Sirota about the 3rd way or the New Democrats: Debunking 'Centrism'
  2. has it ever been repeated? or did Andy's rep scare everybody off?
  3. [video:youtube]Yu5-y3-WVIM
  4. isn't there also a hard climb on the east face of cutthroat?
  5. what's wrong with Tooth and Claw?
  6. j_b

    truth!

    do you actually expect a meaningful answer?
  7. Why the dems may lose seats: Hope Has Left the Building by Arun Gupta If one case encapsulates the disaster that is the Obama administration, it may be the dustup over the A.I.G. bonuses last March. Recall that extreme gambling by A.I.G. Financial Products nearly crashed the world in 2008, necessitating a taxpayer bailout of $182.3 billion (and counting). Following this, A.I.G., now 80 percent government owned, rained more than $400 million in bonuses on Financial Products employees for their performance in 2008. The Obama administration, which knew of the bonuses for months, played defense for A.I.G. by unspooling a bloated Larry Summers to argue, "The government cannot just abrogate contracts." The problem was the feds had just demanded that auto workers abrogate their hard-won contracts before Detroit got a bailout. United Auto Workers leaders complied, sacrificing "job security provisions and financing for retiree health care," plus agreeing to cuts in base pay, overtime pay, break time, raises, skilled worker positions and chopping wages for many new hires in half to $14 an hour. Far from failures or mistakes, these episodes illustrate how Team Obama, which surfed a tsunami of corporate money and savvy branding to victory, is doing exactly what it was elected to do: redistribute money upwards. It's hard to think of a decision by this White House that would have not elicited cackling glee from the Bush administration. The number of horrendous policies] enacted by the Obama administration in barely a year boggles the imagination. What follows is by no means an exhaustive list, just a few dozen of the worst. EMPIRE'S BACKYARD Even Time magazine has concluded that "Obama's Latin American Policy Looks Like Bush's." While many hoped Obama would lift the 48-year-old embargo against Cuba, Obama loosened a few restrictions only for Cuban Americans. Last April, Obama declared the United States a "full partner" in Mexico's calamitous drug war. Months later, the White House slapped Bolivia with economic penalties, allegedly for not being an enthusiastic drug warrior, but more likely for pursuing an independent agenda. And there is the Honduran coup, which Obama endorsed by recognizing the rigged election in November. Most ominously, his administration inked a deal in October for seven military bases in Colombia, convenient for launching new wars against socialist governments in the region. GREEN JOB LOSSES Before Van Jones was thrown under the bus, Obama promised to create five million green jobs in plug-in hybrids, weatherization, renewable energy, biofuels and clean coal. Biofuels and clean coal? Okay, maybe it's a good thing this promise was snuffed. But as Naomi Klein points out, between the stimulus, the auto bailout and the Wall Street rescue, Obama had the leverage and political capital to fund mass transit and a smart electrical grid, restructure government-owned automakers to focus on green technology and force bailed out banks to fund industrial restructuring and green infrastructure. Instead, we get a White House vegetable garden the size of a New York apartment. TOO BIG TO FAIL, TOO BIG TO JAIL While the original Troubled Assets Relief Program was "only" $700 billion, the program's watchdog estimates taxpayer money at risk is a phenomenal $23.7 trillion. The Obama administration has been more interested in defending obscene executive pay, blessing more of Wall Street's highrisk trading, stonewalling on how the TARP funds were used and abused, and resisting real regulation, rather than prosecuting Goldman Sachs and other banks that peddled risky mortgage- backed securities while secretly betting they would plummet in value - a textbook case of securities fraud. But what do you expect from a candidate who raked in the most dough from Wall Street, real estate, commercial banks and hedge funds? A DREAM FORECLOSED In comparison to the bank bailout, relief for homeowners is limited to a miserly $75 billion under Obama's Making Home Affordable program. As of December, only 31,000 homeowners have received permanent mortgage modifications. The real winners are loan servicers. Of the top 25 participants, 21 were "heavily involved in the subprime lending industry." The parent companies of the lenders, which have vacuumed up more than $21 billion from the program, include Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup. Homeowners in the program who don't get permanent help are left with wrecked credit scores while they continue to pay for homes they can't afford, which may be lengthening the crisis. Meanwhile, the number of homeowners with mortgage debt greater than the value of their homes was 23 percent as of September and could peak at 48 percent in 2011. Even modest measures, such as allowing bankruptcy judges to lower mortgages, were abandoned by the Obama administration. HEALTH CARE DEFORM There is a method to Obama's madness. First, his economic philosophy is to subsidize private entities to provide public goods. Second, his main tactic is to appeal to bipartisanship. (Never mind that there was plenty of bipartisanship during the Bush era when Democrats surrendered to virtually every heinous decision.) In the case of healthcare, a much simpler and more effective single-payer system was rejected because Republican support was supposedly needed. The bipartisan tactic allowed the Obama administration to replace single payer with a fake public option that was then dropped. As for the healthcare bill, it will skim $500 billion from publicly funded Medicare and Medicaid and use it to subsidize individuals who will be forced to buy for-profit insurance or pay a fine. The bill does nothing to control costs, ensure quality coverage or prevent workers from losing job-related insurance. It allows for wildly different rates based on age and region, and will deliver millions of new "customers" to insurance and drug companies and for-profit hospitals. WAR IS THE HEALTH OF THE STATE While President-elect, Obama was largely silent about the Israeli slaughter of 1,400 civilians in Gaza. Three days after being inaugurated, Obama ordered Predator drone strikes inside Pakistan, expanding the illegal U.S. war. Over the last year, Obama has committed another 64,000 soldiers to Afghanistan, effectively launching a new year. There are still 115,000 U.S. troops in Iraq. The use of private military contractors is surging, with 121,000 (and growing) in Afghanistan alone. Obama has continued to threaten Iran over its uranium-enrichment program. And many believe the White House is "initiating a low-level war in Yemen." Author and Ret. U.S. Army Col. Andrew Bacevich writes that Obama has effectively signed on to "perpetual war." LABOR PAINS Despite reportedly pouring $450 million into Obama's campaign and providing thousands of volunteers, organized labor has been unable to advance its main cause: a bill called the Employee Free Choice Act that would make it easier for employees in a workplace to unionize. The Obama administration says it is committed to passing the bill, but it has not put any muscle behind it. That may be because wealthy Obama backers, including three Chicago billionaires who own hotels, vehemently oppose the bill. http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/01/08-9
  8. "Pretty please, make it a low turnout so that our 25% dead-enders is enough to win"
  9. It's not an accident since they are handpicked for their marketability.
  10. PP would look less of an hypocrite if he had denounced Bush and the big pharma lobby when they killed the bill that was to allow the import of cheap prescription drugs from Canada and other places where big pharma doesn't make the laws.
  11. Effectively pursuing policies of perpetual war, trillions in corporate welfare, and stamping on civil liberties one day, then advocating isolationism and small government the next day isn't bait and switch? Your rhetoric and that of Brooks indeed makes a mockery of political accountability.
  12. Yea jackkasses spewing BS drive me crazy too J_B! of course, no comment on the noted bait and switch. LOL populism of any stripe is likely to shape the coming decade. It has however no implication for the sincerity of the demagogues who use populism.
  13. Kind of harsh on your buddy Barak there....oh wait, he's still in the first phase and will catch up to the 2nd part later....watch it happen JB. I have said that my "buddy" Obama was just another corporate pol and I called it a dash-pot presidency to save the status-quo despite systemic failure. Everyone says so. "everyone" says that occupying countries in wars of choice is the "moderate" thing to do too.
  14. yep. These jackasses seamlessly went from supporting perpetual war and trillions dollar corporate boondoggles to pretending they are isolationist and for small government.
  15. what gobbledygook. I don't even know where to start unpacking that nonsense. Yet, you'll keep claiming the NYT is a "librul" rag.
  16. Just think of it of my warning folks of a knuckledragger crossing after i just went through it.
  17. j_b

    truth!

    Not only are these advances very tenuous in many judeo-christian liberal democracies, but they are in fact quite recent (less than a century).
  18. j_b

    5.15

    Impressive speed of execution, which points to the amount of rehearsal that goes into that kind of climbing. I hate the rehearsal bit yet there is paradoxically little doubt that it leads to greater on-sight ability. I suspect the catch is that the amount of time spent climbing on-sight is inversely proportional to that spent rehearsing.
  19. j_b

    truth!

    My guess is that it has little to do with Islam per se but with the level of socio-economic development of these cultures, which were almost all feudal/tribal at the turn of the 20th century.
  20. It is indeed significant that well thought out individuals like me who want stability and peace to promote the well being of everyone are considered "on the fringe" by dominant corporate culture while psycopaths like you who revel in the misery of the rest of the world as long as they can benefit from it are supposed to represent the norm. Unwittingly you have illustrated everything that is wrong with establishment propaganda.
  21. j_b

    truth!

    it's also likely that without the policy of meddling and intervention in the Muslim world, there wouldn't be a wave of religious fundamentalism in these regions. right, that's all it would take to launch the culture 600 years into the present and rewrite the Koran so it no longer explicitly and repeatedly teaches its readers to despise non believers. I agree that our politics are not helping matters and in fact fueling the fire, but beyond that ascribing the whole conflict to politics is willful ignorance. The fact of the matter is that fundamentalism has made great headways throughout the muslim world since the policies of meddling intensified. I am no expert in religious writings but I seriously doubt the Koran is anymore intolerant of others than say the old testament.
  22. j_b

    truth!

    it's also likely that without the policy of meddling and intervention in the Muslim world, there wouldn't be a wave of religious fundamentalism in these regions.
  23. j_b

    truth!

    Saying these kinds of things just a few years ago would have gotten you labeled as un-American and a terrorist sympathizer by the freedom gargarizers.
  24. I bet the upswing in 'conservative' self-identification as of late is tied to the blitzkrieg of regressive propaganda regarding "balancing the budget" since they want to make sure the peons pay for the excesses of economic elites of the last 30+ years. It points to the gullibility of TV news watchers who despite tons of evidence don't realize that "fiscal conservative" is an oxymoron. These kinds of polls are the perfect gauge of how well current indoctrination works.
×
×
  • Create New...