sexual_chocolate

No; on the top of my car!

Where's the winery? Is it non-alcoholic?

Weigh does how it much?

Alright, let me rephrase my question: It how much weigh does?

Who's afraid of a little ?

Hey, I don't know about you, but I think this posting business is hard work!

For what ever reason (!), capitalism just isn't such a great word in many parts of the world. Might they be seeing the light?!?!? What many fail to understand about capital management and subsequent harvest is that without limiting the amount of the medium of exchange, capitalism fails. This limitation will always lead to the inequities we see globally. Capitalism will never lead to equitable cohabitation; why are so many so brainwashed? It's funny how people were trumpeting the fall of communism, exclaiming victory for capitalism. Hah! Short-sighted fools!

How much does it weigh?

Did you think of that yourself? Good one!

Hmmm.... Attempts at negotiation first, Taft/Hartley next, and then....?

I think "facts" might be a little hard to come by, 200 years after the fact. I gave you some links to chew on; if you didn't investigate, it ain't my fault. You're on your own on this one, kid. I ain't making Hugo into a saint, but I'll for damn sure say that the view we get about the situation through our main-stream media is a bit skewed, to say the least. Agreed? I also think that if it was a right-wing government and it was leftists protesting, you'd be singing a different tune if someone was murdered "by the government". I ain't defending the killings, but I'm saying there's alot more going on down there than your rightist twist will let you see, which means: who started the violence, were they really unarmed, what was the history of these protests, etc. etc. etc.. How can you be so damned sure it was all Chavez's fault?

Oh fairweather fairweather, I suppose you toe the US government line on this one; an illegal coup is only illegal if it doesn't serve our business interests! Can you believe the nerve of top government officials, saying shortly after the coup, before it died, that Hugo had it coming? Hypocritical freaks! Hugo was democratically elected, by a majority (poor folk. Enough of them in Venezuela, I'd say)), and, here's a good one, has a MANDATE to serve out his term, complete with implementing policies which he said he would during his election campaign! How do you like them apples, Mr. Fairweather? Too democratic for a fascist such as yourself? It's funny to me how he has the suppport of the OAS (much closer to the situation than you are), but in all your self-righteousness, you condemn the man. Well get ready my friend, because I personally think the Latin world has had enough of neoliberal capitalist policy, and soon will be joining his ranks! Hey, Brazil already fell in line. You think Argentina might be next? Bwahahahahahahahahah!!!!!!!!

If you, alpinek, are so negatively moved by mtgoat's posts, then skip 'em, dicksuck. Plenty of other reading material here, my even-keeled friend. As to your buddy being the only one entitled to an opinion on Leavenworth, well, saugst mein schlonge.

Mtgoat, you've changed your mind on this one. I didn't bother reading the rest of your opinions, but this one stood out. Earlier you had said some intervention was called for, but you had misgivings. Why the change of heart? Confidential to Tarasque: Are you drunk again?

I agree: whatever the issue for not voting doesn't change the legitimacy; not voting itself does that very well. Would you say that Hugo Chavez has no mandate, even though elected by a popular majority, but less than 50% of the public?

He has been heavily influenced by Libertarian thought. I believe Ayn Rand is only one (small) example of this influence.

Devil's son.

One point you bring up here I have a problem with: felons losing voting priveleges for life. When did this law come into effect? Anyone know? Have challenges been brought against it? It seems to me that once a person's sentence/debt to society is fulfilled, that's that. This law turns the penalty into a life sentence.

Tribout, do you really think that voting access is a serious problem in the US? I heard of instances in Florida, instances that seemed quite serious, but do you think this is widespread enough to claim that the entire process is corrupt? And I really want to repeat my previous assertion: It doesn't matter whether the pres got 1% of total eligible votes or 99%; if he/she wins, that's it. Vote the ass out of office next election. Get the public off their goddamn fat asses and to the polls. People whining and moaning about the conditions, yet doing nothing about it really pisses me off.

Sandanista. With an a.

You know, this new message board sucks. The amount of thread activity, with the resultant page after page of topics to sift through makes life here pretty complicated. Plus, renaming threads? That really sucks. All of a sudden you don't even know what to search for. So there you have it. These are the things that make things annoying around here. Watch it buster.

I couldn't care less. Couldn't You're so....street! Your rep grows daily!

Oh muffy muffy muffy (End comment here.)

With the USA. With.