Jump to content

[TR] Mt Stuart - West Ridge Speed Climb 9/21/2007


off_the_hook

Recommended Posts

Trip: Mt. Stuart - West Ridge Speed Climb

 

Date: 9/21/2007

 

Trip Report:

Scott G. and I speed climbed the West Ridge of Mount Stuart in 8 hours roundtrip, starting just before 6 am and finishing just before 2 pm. We reached the summit 4:50 after beginning, took a 35 minute break at the top, and wrapped up the climb via a swift Cascadian descent for 8 hours total.

 

I was home for the week from CA and I wanted to squeeze in a climb if the weather allowed. The forecast for Friday looked ok, but the weather turned out to be idyllic with clear skies and cool temps. Anything hotter would have made the Cascadian descent and subsequent ascent up Longs Pass uncomfortable. This was my first time up Stuart on any route and Scott’s first ascent of the West Ridge. However, the only route finding error we made the entire day was missing the exit off I-90 in Cle Elum while we were talking about climbing.

 

I thought the route was really fun and Scott was an awesome partner for this speedy ascent. We roped up for two half pitches, once while on the north side where new ice and snow on the rock made it more hazardous and the second time on the crux moves in the crack below the summit. The West Ridge probably takes the prize for the most bivy sites on a climbing route!

 

Location (Elevation): Time Elapsed / Split / Real Time

Ingalls Lake TH : 0 / 0 / 05:57

Ingalls Lake : ~1:10 / ~1:10 / 07:07

Start of West Ridge Route : ~2:00 / ~50.00 / 07:57

Arrive Summit : 4:50.25 / 2:50.25 / 10:47

Depart Summit : 5:25.32 / 35.06 / 11:22

Ingalls Lake TH : 8:00.49 / 2:35.17 / 13:58

 

stuart0001.JPG

 

stuart0002.JPG

 

Early views of Rainier, Chimney Rock, Lemah.

 

stuart0003.JPG

 

stuart0004.JPG

The beginning of the West Ridge route. I thought the scrambling for a couple thousand feet in the couloir and up Long John Tower was super fun.

 

stuart0005.JPG

West Ridge notch.

 

stuart0006.JPG

Climbing on the cold north side. Recent snow and ice on the rocks made the north side alpine-feeling and it was cold and windy on this side of the mountain.

 

stuart0007.JPG

Summit view to Rainier.

 

stuart0008.JPG

 

stuart0012.JPG

 

stuart0010.JPG

 

stuart0013.JPG

Ingalls Peaks and Ingalls Lake

 

stuart0014.JPG

Glory Optical Phenomenon. The winds were picking up the moisture and snow crystals from the recent snow creating "insta-clouds".

 

stuart0017.JPG

 

stuart0018.JPG

Stuart Glacier.

 

stuart0015.JPG

Awesome lighting on Stuart from Longs Pass.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gear Notes:

30 m rope, a few cams, sticky-soled trail runners (La Sportiva Exum Ridge). A pole and gaiters for the Cascadian descent was nice to have.

 

Approach Notes:

Good shape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

We were just below the ridge, then on the ridge (all on climbers paths) until a short traverse through a boulder field brought us to the couloir entrance.

 

We spent lots of time on the summit and bringing/using a rope probably added at least an hour, but I was happy to have the rope.

 

We knew about the Miles Smart time (5:45) and after doing the route, we agreed that the time is very impressive, but feasible if one is soloing, has prior knowledge of the route, and decides to eliminate breaks.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear this frequently, the part about eliminating breaks. But it's not like those breaks don't help you. That is, I doubt you'd have been an entire 35 minutes faster by just tagging the summit and continuing on.

 

You could certainly better your time by rolling the dice and soloing, but obviously you didn't. Seems like a very sound decision to me. Significantly increasing your risk of death clearly seems like a very steep price to pay for a quicker time report. I respect your decision, but it does seem a bit silly to imply that you could have done it quicker. Doing it quicker would have required doing something that you weren't willing to do.

 

Maybe next time.

 

If you didn't have the icy conditions up top, it may have been more feasible to go ropeless. Also, there is a way to avoid any fifth class on the final summit block (i.e. that crux near the top with the fixed pin). You can corkscrew around the summit going up and around ledges to the left, then squeezing behind a big block, which puts you just below the summit to the NW.

Edited by chucK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You could certainly better your time by rolling the dice and soloing, but obviously you didn't. Seems like a very sound decision to me. Significantly increasing your risk of death clearly seems like a very steep price to pay for a quicker time report. I respect your decision, but it does seem a bit silly to imply that you could have done it quicker. Doing it quicker would have required doing something that you weren't willing to do.

 

After climbs, I often look back and analyze how thing went, then see how I can improve for my next foray into the hills. Did I eat enough? Was there extra food/water in my pack when I was done? How many route-finding errors did I make, and how can I avoid them in the future? Thats exactly what OTH was doing here by speculating that we could have gone faster by eliminating the rope. Not to say that we would ever do that on an route such as this, but it gives others an idea of what to expect...

 

Leor's a good guy; very fast on the easy terrain, and a fun dude to be around. I figured the fact that he placed 2nd in the Cle-Elm Ridge 50k last Saturday would mean I could keep up with him (because I thought he'd be tired, which he wasen't), and I think we worked well together.

Cool route, now bring on the winter!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Small world -- I am one of the three 12-time Cle Elum Ridge 50k finishers, and climbed the West Ridge of Stuart with 9-time CER50k finisher Ted Mueser several years ago. BUT, we took waaaay more than 8 hours -- hell, we bivied at the West Ridge Notch.

 

BTW, there are no 13-time CER50k finishers -- Mark Konodi DNF'ed this year. I DNS due to a mountaineering injury, and Ron Warner DNS.

 

Speedy work, men. And congrats on a swift 50k at CE.

Edited by BigSteve
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice onsight, Leor + Scott. One of my favorite mountains - gotta love granite. I was going to say it was pretty fine for a day trip, but at 8 hours it's too far under 1/2 day to say that!

 

I think Steph and I contributed one of those many bivy sites last summer when we had to halt our descent down the West Ridge just above that jog onto the north side. We didn't think of looking on that side until the morning light.

 

And I like the part about missing the exit while talking about climbing - I do that too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:wave: Howdy Amigo!

I modified Bug's nice picture to show our route (in green) on the upper mountain. After the north side traverse, we dropped down a bit on the south side then set up a belay at a fixed hex with blue tat below a bombay chimney with twin cracks. Felt 5.6ish.

Stuart.jpg

Edited by scottgg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're lines drawn in above prompted me to look back at the other pictures.

 

Where is this taken? That's Stuart Lake in the background, which should pretty much be behind the summit from anywhere on the West Ridge.

stuart0006.JPG

 

I'm really confused now.

 

OK, now it looks like you guys might be very near the summit. Did you traverse around left (to the North side) then climb back up SW to the crest?

 

 

Edited by chucK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:wave: Howdy Amigo!

I modified Bug's nice picture to show our route (in green) on the upper mountain. After the north side traverse, we dropped down a bit on the south side then set up a belay at a fixed hex with blue tat below a bombay chimney with twin cracks. Felt 5.6ish.

Stuart.jpg

 

There is also a really nice 5.6 crack in a right facing corner from the high point of the red dots past the green and purple lines to the green line. Very exposed but very easy and easy to protect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...