Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Interesting. It'd be interesting to learn if the rules that the FDIC uses for losses on loan-portfolios that get picked up by the bank that takes over the failing bank are discretionary or statutory.

 

One more reason that public insurance for bank deposits larger than ~$5,000 whatever will cover the cash savings of genuinely poor people is a terrible idea. If you have more than that socked away, you could afford private deposit insurance, which would make it more expensive to keep your money at a sketchy bank and cheaper to keep your money at a sound bank.

 

Few people know that even the likes of FDR opposed public deposit insurance because it resulted in significantly more bank failures in the few states that tried it out. When no one had to worry about whether or not their bank was sound, bad banks were able to attract far more deposits than they would have otherwise.

 

The most influential group lobbying for public deposit insurance were community bankers, who knew that it would enable them to attract far more deposits than they'd be able to if they had to compete with large banks. They were also able to limit interstate banking, which also made bank-failures more common than they'd be otherwise.

 

IMO if you've got enough wherewithal to sock away more than a few thousand dollars you can fork over whatever it would cost to insure your stash on your own dime.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...