Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was wondering what people think about what seems to be a trend of newer models of jackets having less adjustability? I found this place as I was searching for used Marmot Trango Sweaters because the new ones are way less adjustable. By adjustable I mean a collar cord, pit zips, velcro cuffs and a hem cord, which all greatly expand temp range of jackets

Are this changes cost cutting? or simplifing to loss weight?

 

Thanks,

Dave

  • Replies 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Some features of a jacket are essential... one's climbing style will dictate what is included on that list...

 

I agree with velcro cuffs (out of curiosity what did Marmot replace the cuff closure with?), and a hem cord... but that is about it.

 

IMO:

 

A collar cord is extra weight as if the spin drift/weather is that bad you would have a jacket with a hood on anyways.

 

Pit zips break and are extra weight. Yes I own a few jackets that do have them but its because the manufacture didn't offer a zipperless option.

 

I would suggest reading Twight's Extreme alpinism for a good discussion/debunk of "the layering system". Gadd's Climbing Ice discussion and scenario is also a must read. I would be happy to photocopy them for you and mail them to you if you'd like.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...