Peter_Puget Posted May 29, 2007 Posted May 29, 2007 Link Gerberding said health authorities were aware of the man's condition before he left the United States and warned him against traveling. "Under the circumstances, I think we were surprised that the patient had left the country," she said. She said the man had "compelling personal reasons" to travel despite being ill. "I want to emphasize that from our perspective, no laws were broken here," Gerberding said. Quote
i_like_sun Posted May 29, 2007 Posted May 29, 2007 ISOLATION IS GOOD. ALLOWING THE DUDE TO TRAVEL = VERY BAD TB is fucking terrible. I've seen cadaver lungs that were destroyed by it, and may I tell you, YOU DON'T WANT IT! Quote
Peter_Puget Posted May 29, 2007 Author Posted May 29, 2007 Missed this: The man was aware that he had tuberculosis at the time of the flight, but was not aware that it was the drug-resistant strain, Gerberding said. Quote
Seahawks Posted May 29, 2007 Posted May 29, 2007 I think he broke the rights of everyone on those two flights. Selfish idiot. Quote
sirwoofalot Posted May 29, 2007 Posted May 29, 2007 a persons right to smoke ends at my nose. I have the right to breath clean air. How does what he did differ than the smoker who blows smoke in my face? Quote
Seahawks Posted May 29, 2007 Posted May 29, 2007 a persons right to smoke ends at my nose. I have the right to breath clean air. How does what he did differ than the smoker who blows smoke in my face? Using the clean air Analogy does that aplly to vehicles??? Especially those diesel suckers? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.