Sam Furley

Well, hear me out feller. I'll assume you voted for Barry. Last election time, you knew BO was the greatest thing going for this nation, you alerted us all to his worthiness as a presidential candidate (despite many warning you he'd be the worst thing possible for this country). We all know how that worked out. Obama is a fucking idiot and he is the worst thing possible for this country. So now with your excellent reputation for assessing political candidates, all of a sudden you expect us to give two fucks about your opinion? Correct me if I'm wrong in any of this, otherwise you should probably just STFU.

Apparently one word answers are difficult for you. In that event, I'm not sure you should go giving political advice.

Could you point that out, or better yet, just use one word? Makes it easier on me - too much thinking otherwise.

Do you think I'm trying to trick you or something? Just answer the question, and let me do the responding. Don't pretend you can guess where I'm going with this.

Well assumptions are like cooters, and yours smells like sourkraut.

Look I porbably dont have the best grammer but i can read and i still aint seen where you answered my first question. When I get an answer, then we can talk. Till then, shit's just fucked up and bullshit.

After all, hope and change is working pretty good.

C'mon, feller, who'd you vote for?

That's what I thought.

Dear fuckstick, Who did you vote for in the last election? Sincerely, -Samuel D Furley

If it were me, I'd take down the first photo and be a bit more classy on how I approached the situation. I get that people don't like the way others do things at times, but saying "FU" only serves to propagate an "us against them" mentality. If we're trying to improve things instead of fanning the flames, then I'm pretty sure tactful discussion is the best way to go about doing that. Anyhow, you got your trip, the park issued you your permit, the park came on here and tactfully explained their side of the story, so it appears things have been fixed. I don't really see the need to carry on with the middle finger. Then again, you're the captain of your own ship.

I've got news for you.. there is no such word as anti-smite in the english language. So please, just shut your pie hole and let grown folks do the critical thinking.

Pretty sure she'd roll you like a burrito.

I'm sure Anita would be delighted to have you symps drool all over her.

I think more people should dope.. it would make the races more interesting. I also think joblo is a fuck knob.

H0wwittzer

WorldNetDaily has a similar tool. Check it out.

Why should anyone have to even things out? Don't rich people earn their money just like everyone else? Why should rich people be penalized? Simply because they're rich? Rich people obviously went right somewhere along the way.. they probably made some sacrifices, they most likely took some risk.. why should anybody be penalized for achieving? The last two of your sentences don't make any sense. I'm sure now you'll just pretend none of this makes sense, but put down the bong for five minutes, and give it some thought.

You clearly have a problem with reading comprehension. I was commenting on the WSJ article Jay_B linked to. "President Obama's response to congressional efforts to curb runaway federal spending is to emphasize, once again, his resolve to greatly increase tax rates on married couples whose joint incomes are above $250,000. This insistent desire to raise taxes—which he repeated in a speech yesterday while complaining about "trillions of dollars in . . . tax cuts that went to every millionaire and billionaire in the country"—is a distraction. It won't solve our nation's fiscal problem." I have no idea what Jay_B's position is on taxing the rich, so I'm not sure how you came to the conclusion that we both support taxing the rich. Probably the same way you yourself came to the conclusion that taxing the rich is a good idea - confused [feel-good] "logic".

Unfortunately, this doesn't register with many on the socialist end of the spectrum. They continue to delude themselves into thinking that taxing the rich will get us out of this budget conundrum. Feel-good logic is so trendy, it's what got Obama elected.

Yeah, you sure showed' em up, tvash! 300 posts per day in the spray forum is the most valuable use of time!!! You clownpunchers have fun, I'm just here to stir up the pot of shit. Bon appetit!

See, ^^ there comes one now.

Spray is one giant conglomerate of village idiots.

Actually, I recycle because all my friends do.

it's nothing compared to voting for Bush then claiming that Obama is a socialist. That is legit retarded. Obama led a very deceptive campaign, probably among the most deceptive ever. Indeed, Obama "is" pushing a socialist agenda. You are correct that his campaign was very deceptive (as are most politicians'). The Bush administration was bad, but better than Obama's administration by leaps and bounds. I can proudly say I did not vote for Obama. Hopefully others wake up and realize that extremist agendas are bringing this nation down. It's the left AND the right.