I agree with that. The odds of anchor failure are really low (mostly because anchors are almost never tested ... people seem to know better than to fall directly on them).
The issue is that the stakes are so high. When anchors do fail, it's usually the end for everyone involved. And since there have been a few high profile (and fatal) anchor failures in recent years, and since recent studies show that most of the common techniques leave something to be desired, the subject is worth a second thought.
But I would never switch to something slow and complex that introduces whole new dangers just because it works well on paper or in the lab. I'm only interested in solutions that are fast and versatile, and difficult to screw up.