Wow, "reservable overnighting facilities operated by three private commercial entities" is exceedingly vague about who gets to use it.
I feel like if you're going to allow any kind of development on public land it should be publicly accessible. The way I understood it last time was that the huts were going to be for private guided groups. I don't want more access for the rich pay to play crowd at the expense of any portion of the public trust. Cheap public huts like in Canada... maybe.