Jump to content

Bob42

Members
  • Posts

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Bob42

  1. So apparently the tough, vital young stud just put to the White House is already too tired to do anything but piss off our friends:

     

    UK Article

     

    I suppose one could expect something like this had the tired old war hero been elected, but it just seems so terribly unexpected from our friend Mr. Hussein Obama.

     

    What gives?

     

    - Peace

  2. Never heard of him.

     

    :shock:

     

    That about figures. Of course you've never heard of him. And yet you talk smack all day about *climbers* on a *climbing site*? You really are an incredible douchebag.

     

    Look him up - read a little. It won't hurt, I promise.

     

    Goddamn you are an idiot!

     

    - Peace

  3. I don't see a specific forum for the lamest-est-es rock and roll topic but maybe I missed it while I was searching for climbing\

     

     

    Its called spray.

     

     

    Sorry for spraying in a climbing forum...but I am sticking to it. Downgrading a climb that NO ONE posting here will ever climb is point less to discuss.

     

    but....I do respect most slab climbs, especially if they are 5.13

     

    Good to have you along. So glad you respect 5.13 slab! WTF does that mean, anyway? You "respect" it? Who cares? You're a miserable little creature, kevbone. Pity the sad bastard who must interact with you in person. Are you as much a blithering idiot in the flesh?

     

    The mind simply staggers!

     

    - Peace

  4. I grew up in Seattle going to Seafair and watcing the Blue Angels down on the lake each year. As a result, I've been conditioned to be wowed by then since I was a kid.

     

    In this age of global rampage and the terror we impose on other nations, either through outright aggression or through arms sales to those who do the same, we have lots of refugees who've relocated to our area.

     

    I wonder how they react to the howl of these jets that may have been a signal in an earlier time to death of loved ones.

     

    Anyway, something to ponder...

     

    Fuck off.

     

    Better yet, go watch the sky on a bombing range somewhere. Ponder the blue sky. Think about how for some sad fuck that's the last thing he's going to see - thanks to jets like that. Life's a bitch.

     

    Fuckhead.

     

    Bob.

  5. Guys, your puerile attempt to discredit me by dismissing me as a Communist/Nationalist/spy is pathetic, and only serves to further demonstrate the height of your ignorance.

     

    NONE of my family members including myself, my relatives and my friends are from communist party , none of us ever work for Chinese government. We are the Chinese minority just like the Tibetans.

     

    In conclusion please remember that I'm not in agreement with all that the Chinese govt. does or has done in the past and that is why I'm here in Canada.

    I love Canada and I'm proud that I'm a Canadian too.

     

    Sure you are, love. You really are wasting your time here. There are better places for you to spread your lies.

     

    How many of you are there in the room? Is it sad not having any girls around? Are you so miserably shitty at your job that you've been assigned *this* project?

     

    Because, really, there's no one of any importance here. You aren't going to influence much here. Not enough people read it. The people who agree with you need no further convincing.

     

    Perhaps you shouldn't come on just quite so strongly. All the pictures, links, rather poorly executed propaganda? Come on, man, are you so stupid to think we're that stupid?

     

    Ask your boss for a different assignment. Someone of your caliber could possibly bill families for the bullet used to execute their kin. Unless the price of ammo changes - that might be a bit complicated for you.

     

    Best of luck.

     

    We'll crush you in about 20 years.

     

    - Peace

  6. it's weird how a party that's in accordance with the public's opinions on almost every issue can manage to lose elections.

     

    ...maybe because they aren't.

     

    actually fw, they are. from social security to taxes to health care to inheritance tax to war and the military budget, the conservative republican agenda is not favored by the majority of americans. it's actually not even close on some of these issues.

     

    Right.

     

    The whole Democratic candidate election process is showing in glaring detail the utter ineptitude of these idiots. A sad old hag who has practically no experience except sharing a philandering schmuck with his wobbly-assed secretary is locked in a near tie with someone who could best be described as a brilliant character actor who would, given the opportunity, institute Sharia law in this country.

     

    Obviously they're about evenly matched, which says nothing for either one except that they are unsuited to the job at stake.

     

    So what happens when the Dems loose this one? What options are left after that? Who is there to wearily take up the mantle in four years for the next big one? How are all the people they've depended on for so long, now feeling terribly screwed, going to fare?

     

    The Dems really should think about this; they've already lost this election.

     

    - Bob

  7. One thing that's come out of this horse race is that the Democratic Party could flunk a urine test. This comes as no surprise, of course, to anyone from either party, although the GOP has been hogging the headlines for fucking up for a few years now.

     

    First the debacles in Michigan and Florida, which the Clinton camp is now trying to reverse. Now the Texas Cockup system; 2/3 primary, 1/3 caucus? Jebus, could you make it more ambiguous, delayed, complicated and confusing? And, coming up next, the superdelegate fiasco. What purpose, in what universe, do these birds in guilded cages serve?

     

    Our own Washington caucus system is a complete and utter waste of time and effort. Instead of taking advantage of a simple, but expensive primary, which our Secretary of State mandated, and which was, essentially, a complete waste of money, Washington State Democrats insisted on clinging to an archaic, confusing, multi-stage caucus system. I should know, I'm a delegate, so I get to go to a second caucus on April 5th, after the Democratic candidate will probably have been chosen. To what end?

     

    The Democrats at both the state and national level desperately need to get their flustered heads out of their yoga toned asses and streamline this system; by copying the GOPs MUCH simpler and foolproof system, for example.

     

    Or, even better, work towards getting rid of the delegate system altogether.

     

     

     

    So they can't run an election, why not let one try with the country? Bet that would work out.

     

    Dumbasses.

     

    This is the type of executive decision making one can expect from folks who think Derrida is a genius. Or that Marx was smart. Or that Chavez is a good leader. It's funny watching you self-destruct, somewhat sad that it's taking so long.

     

    On a side note, cool to see that someone (couldn't be with CIA help, oh no!) is poking their finger in Chavez's face by liquidating his boyfriends in the FARC.

     

    - Bob

  8. Yessuh, Mistuh Scuhleeuh!

     

    So now you've taken it upon yourself to identify who does and does not represent some arbitrarily acceptable level of, of, of what? Negritude? Blackness? African-American-ness?

     

    And you've further concluded that you have the right to determine that not being at the level you've concluded is acceptable for this person you'll point it out by a racist slur?

     

    Of course the conclusion is that Americans of African descent do not have the right of self-determination - instead they must be sure to check in with you asshats to ensure compliance with your accepted standards of, for lack of a better term, Blackness?

     

    You're a racist little prick, Mr. T.

     

    - Bob

  9.  

    Hey "Bob", since you're new around here and don't seem to have an avatar yet, I'd like to make a suggestion:

     

    timzaccheo.jpg

     

    Your poor mother, Prole! No wonder you're so confused. Did she fall from the top of her cell wing? Forget to put out the cigar when siphoning gas? Hit her face with a mallet after hearing you speak for the first time? Russian roulette with a howitzer? Group sex with hyenas? Eeek, man.

     

    Back to normal people....

     

    - Bob

  10.  

    Hey Clownpunch- you forgot to ask whether I cared if Obama becomes president; I don't, actually, because he won't be much better than anyone else, he's another empty suit. I said when he becomes president, meaning, I just suspect he's going to win it because a) McCain is hated by half of his own party for being a "traitor",

     

    Not really what I hear - could be the folks at CNN/NYT trying to stick to their journalistic ideals by throwing a horserace. We'll see.

     

    and b) the country is looking for "change" again and this time it's the Democrats that have the momentum since change implies people are fed up with 8 years of bullshit from Republicans. Whether Obama delivers any "change" is a big wild card, but given the state of American politics and the disintegration of this culture...that'll be the day.

     

    Oh he'll deliver change, all right. Congress will have to paint the walls green to go along with the new seats for Hezbollah that Obama will install. Louis Farrakhan might even be Obama's Minister for Religion and Peace. Who knows?

     

    Meanwhile, it's laughable that you so readily dismiss Obama's chances against McCain- typical arrogance to underestimate your opponent.

     

    I really don't underestimate Obama. He is wildly persuasive. Other people throughout history have shared this trait while not necessarily being all that great in the long run; examples would include Joseph Smith, Jr., Shoko Asahara, Jim Jones, etc.

     

    If Obama's campaign manages to finally mobilize the black and youth vote across the country, you will find out just how far from the "majority" reactionary assholes like you really are in this country.

     

    Whatever.

     

    Dean wanted to do it, you guys thought Dean had done it, he didn't do it.

     

    The Left is self-destructing, as it should. The inherent contradictions in its structure leave disintegration as the expected outcome. The Left will never be able to build a comprehensive consensus because that structure is considered evil by the Left when it arises elsewhere. Anything that rises above the mediocre is subject to the Left's pitiful whining.

     

    Oh and love how all of a sudden you have something semi-complimentary to say about Hillary- "she has experience". Now that's funny. The best part of this campaign has been watching her demonstrate to the entire country what an angry, power hungry, devil bitch she really is. Hillary as pres? Fuck that!

     

    Too true! However, she is a lot better than Obama. She has experience *compared to* Obama. Which is why it's really too bad that Obama is rolling over her.

     

    Anyway, when Obama is elected, is there a country run by a military dictatorship you plan to move to escape socialism and takeover by terrorists and their sympathizers? Whatever will you do? :mistat:

     

    Funny stuff! Not really a question, since your hypothesis makes no sense. Obama? Elected? Right...

     

    - Bob

  11.  

    Seems like the issue at hand is he's NOT DOING THAT JOB SO WELL, dumbass.

     

    :tdown:

    Weird how guys like you are so quick to defend your token black conservative with reactionary statements that attempt to make you look "fair and balanced".

     

    When Obama becomes president we'll see how apolitical you are, assclown.

     

    :ass:

     

     

    :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

     

    Obama as president? Now *that's funny*.... Y'all would've been better off with Hillary - at least she does have experience and can only be connected to the normal bits that are expected from living for a while. Husbands cheat, especially ones named Bill Clinton.

     

    It serves you right that you really think Obama has a chance - apparently the liberal education serves to muddle the brain.

     

    Too bad.

     

    I'll feel sorry for you when you're crying over Obama's loss. Really. Really. Sorry. :laf:

     

    - Bob

  12. Scalia is a reactionary s.o.b. but he is in no way the intellectual lightweight that is Thomas - whose criticism of affirmative action is only slightly less ironic than W's take on legacy admissions.

     

    Weird that when an American black finds success in a job which serves society he or she is immediately vilified by folks like you.

     

    No fun to watch history march past your dead ideology, is it?

     

    - Bob

  13. What have you got against hope and change? THEY WORK. its better than what we have now!

     

    As a side note, it may be too early now, but have you noticed how relatively "clean" the election has been so far? Very little in the way of the dirt has come out on any candidates. Oh well, thats just me being optamistic. I am sure they are all just in the information gathering stage at this point.

     

    Although not particularly attracted to either candidate from the Democratic Party I do find it most unfortunate that the more qualified of the two is losing to a candidate who represents the ability of appallingly skilled oration to seduce peoples' minds.

     

    It has been surprisingly non-negative to date. The possible attacks on Hillary are manifold and well-known, making them I think easier to defend against. Barack has not really been attacked yet, except for vague directions to an already known lack of experience.

     

    It will be interesting, when he is nominated, to see just how far the other side will go - even so far as his connection with and personal support of a losing Kenyan presidential candidate who entered into binding agreements with Islamic clerics to institute Sharia should he be elected. Or perhaps his support of an institution in Chicago, claiming to be a Christian church, which has presented Louis Farrakhan with their highest honour.

     

    Should be interesting.

     

    - Bob

    Cute

    Poster: tvashtarkatena

    And who the fuck are you, troll?

     

    Not much of an answer, I'm afraid. Perhaps you should try again.

     

    - Bob

    Cute

    Cindy Sheehan is working in Cairo to release from prosecution members of the terrorist organization The Muslim Brotherhood, an organization considering even other Muslims not belonging to The Muslim Brotherhood as apostate and requiring execution. To say nothing of their progressive views towards non-Muslims.

     

    What is the significance of an American woman defending such individuals? What is her interest defending individuals who consider her as property, as someone who is at least subject to successful proselytizing failing which she is subject to death?

     

    Does her direct involvement in working to secure the release of these individuals cause her to be non-casually implicated as an accessory to future crimes committed by these individuals, given their clearly stated intentions?

     

    Do her actions in Egypt require that her previous work in the United States be evaluated in light of a demonstrable support of terrorist organizations committed to the destruction of everything they consider non-Muslim?

     

    At what point should her support of organizations working to destroy the state be considered possessive of actual criminal intent by the state?

     

    - Bob

×
×
  • Create New...