Fairweather Posted May 3, 2015 Author Share Posted May 3, 2015 Is there a reason bicyclists shouldn't help pay for the tailored infrastructure they now demand and enjoy? after all we should be mad at who faux news tells us to be mad at. The cost of bike lanes per year from the average taxpayer must be in the pennies because it's not even on this chart. Probably one of the biggest fraud props ever posted here. In case you didn't notice, there are a few things missing. Check your sources--at least Jim's are legitimate, even if, from my perspective, his interpretations are horribly wrong. Buck we already know where you stand on 9/11 Truth; I'd like to know where you stand on the moon landings. Truth? or a government movie-set fiction? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckaroo Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 Probably one of the biggest fraud props ever posted here. In case you didn't notice, there are a few things missing. Check your sources--at least Jim's are legitimate, even if, from my perspective, his interpretations are horribly wrong. Buck we already know where you stand on 9/11 Truth; I'd like to know where you stand on the moon landings. Truth? or a government movie-set fiction? Why don't you post the Faux News break down on taxes then. Commondreams is legit, and the white house, well we know you deal with that based on the R or D. The truth is corporations pay less and less taxes, many of them don't pay any taxes. The amounts are staggering, making your complaint about bicycles entirely pathetic. Uh, the moon landings being a hoax was perpetrated by Faux News in case you don't remember. A conservative right wing organization. Hey, that's your side you big dummy. You have no reply on 911 based on any engineering or physics standpoint, all you got is ad-hom as usual. Have you ever done any welding? Know what it takes to melt steel? Know what melted steel and melted aluminum looks like? Any knowledge about how modern skyscrapers are constructed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LUCKY Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 10 states that Gallup ranks as “most conservative” received 21.2 percent of their income in government transfers, while the number for the 10 most liberal states was only 17.1 percent. Now, there’s no mystery about red-state reliance on government programs. These states are relatively poor, which means both that people have fewer sources of income other than safety-net programs and that more of them qualify for “means-tested” programs such as Medicaid. But why do regions that rely on the safety net elect politicians who want to tear it down? 44 percent of Social Security recipients, 43 percent of those receiving unemployment benefits, and 40 percent of those on Medicare say that they “have not used a government program.” Presumably, then, voters imagine that pledges to slash government spending mean cutting programs for the idle poor, not things they themselves count on. And this is a confusion politicians deliberately encourage. For example, when Romney responded to the new Obama budget, he condemned Obama for not taking on entitlement spending - and, in the very next breath, attacked him for cutting Medicare. The truth, of course, is that the vast bulk of entitlement spending goes to the elderly, the disabled, and working families, so any significant cuts would have to fall largely on people who believe that they don’t use any government program. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlpineK Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 Don't expect a quick reply LUCKY. Fairweather is probably going over his budget for after cashing his government checks on May Day [img:center]http://epicmpls.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/may-day-fb-and-whatsapp-status-2015.jpg[/img] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LUCKY Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 Don't expect a quick reply LUCKY. Fairweather is probably going over his budget for after cashing his government checks on May Day [img:center]http://epicmpls.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/may-day-fb-and-whatsapp-status-2015.jpg[/img] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glassgowkiss Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 Don't expect a quick reply LUCKY. Fairweather is probably going over his budget for after cashing his government checks on May Day Probably FW is busy monitoring (from his mom's basement) military activity and sniffing out Obama takeover of WA State. http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2015/05/02/403865824/texas-governor-deploys-national-guard-to-stave-off-obama-takeover Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckaroo Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 10 states that Gallup ranks as “most conservative” received 21.2 percent of their income in government transfers, while the number for the 10 most liberal states was only 17.1 percent. Now, there’s no mystery about red-state reliance on government programs. These states are relatively poor, which means both that people have fewer sources of income other than safety-net programs and that more of them qualify for “means-tested” programs such as Medicaid. But why do regions that rely on the safety net elect politicians who want to tear it down? 44 percent of Social Security recipients, 43 percent of those receiving unemployment benefits, and 40 percent of those on Medicare say that they “have not used a government program.” Presumably, then, voters imagine that pledges to slash government spending mean cutting programs for the idle poor, not things they themselves count on. And this is a confusion politicians deliberately encourage. For example, when Romney responded to the new Obama budget, he condemned Obama for not taking on entitlement spending - and, in the very next breath, attacked him for cutting Medicare. The truth, of course, is that the vast bulk of entitlement spending goes to the elderly, the disabled, and working families, so any significant cuts would have to fall largely on people who believe that they don’t use any government program. There's three types of Republicans, the super rich, the shills for the super rich, and the misinformed who vote against their own interests. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dougd Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 "Misinformation" is becoming a huge negative issue in contemporary America... Right up there with "extremism" IMO. Too many w/o requisite filtering skills... d Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glassgowkiss Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 There is good look at republican base: [video:youtube]E48QqcTOXeY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glassgowkiss Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 And the parade of share indoctrination, stupidity and rejection of science and logic continues in Republican party, at the highest level: http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-gop-attack-on-climate-change-science-20150501-column.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glassgowkiss Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 "Researchers have found a possible explanation for why certain people are prejudiced: they’re less intelligent. Children with lower general intelligence are more likely to become prejudiced as adults, according to a Brock University study." Link Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlpineK Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 "Researchers have found a possible explanation for why certain people are prejudiced: they’re less intelligent. Children with lower general intelligence are more likely to become prejudiced as adults, according to a Brock University study." Link The article I posted earlier in this thread comes to similar conclusions https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201003/why-liberals-are-more-intelligent-conservatives [img:center]https://cdn.psychologytoday.com/files/u15/Political%20ideology.jpg[/img] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairweather Posted May 4, 2015 Author Share Posted May 4, 2015 Don't expect a quick reply LUCKY. Fairweather is probably going over his budget for after cashing his government checks on May Day [img:center]http://epicmpls.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/may-day-fb-and-whatsapp-status-2015.jpg[/img] Nah, never had got one of thim checks. Course a fella like you in yur line a work is well known for doin jobs under the table cash money. Bet yur taxes is about half or less what they ought. May Day? Used to be a day when your kids left flowers on neighbors' doors. Now it's just an excuse for you and your fellow tools to go out and destroy other people's things. We have a holiday called Labor Day. Ever heard of it? Duh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairweather Posted May 4, 2015 Author Share Posted May 4, 2015 "Misinformation" is becoming a huge negative issue in contemporary America... Right up there with "extremism" IMO. Too many w/o requisite filtering skills... d Um, hey, you're the guys with the 9/11 truther, the massage therapist, and the brain-damaged moderator batting for you here. Misinformation? Yes, I'd say you are correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glassgowkiss Posted May 4, 2015 Share Posted May 4, 2015 brain-damaged moderator batting for you here. Way to show true colors douchebag. Making fun of people after accidents is really classy way to go. What's next? Making fun of mentally ill, disabled and handicapped? Who the fuck raised you asshole? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted May 4, 2015 Share Posted May 4, 2015 Way to show true colors douchebag. Making fun of people after accidents is really classy way to go. What's next? Making fun of mentally ill, disabled and handicapped? Who the fuck raised you asshole? Not everyone can be a class act like you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Furley Posted May 4, 2015 Share Posted May 4, 2015 Dang assholekisser, you are a complete fucking moron - truly. So much so that I don't even know where to begin. Your level of thought rivals those of your crony cc lifers. It would behoove you to stop getting all your news from memes and your buddies on cc.com who don't know their elbow from their asshole. Maybe try and read a book some time? These are just suggestions, feel free to ignore them and go on living your life the consummate turd burglar. That goes for all the rest of you dumb libtards who want to retort. You too sirs, are dicknoses. Hey fellers, we'll see you in another six months. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairweather Posted May 4, 2015 Author Share Posted May 4, 2015 The article I posted earlier in this thread comes to similar conclusions https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201003/why-liberals-are-more-intelligent-conservatives [img:center]https://cdn.psychologytoday.com/files/u15/Political%20ideology.jpg[/img] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satoshi_Kanazawa Simple K, it should come as no surprise to you and your fellow morons here that the article you posted was written by a crackpot who has been banned from the very publication you cited: Satoshi Kanazawa . . . "Some of his work is not considered by his critics to be mainstream evolutionary psychology. In response to ongoing controversy over views such as that African countries suffer chronic poverty and illness because their people have lower IQs and that black women are "objectively less attractive" than other races, he was dismissed from writing for Psychology Today. His current employer – the London School of Economics – has prohibited him from publishing in non-peer-reviewed outlets for 12 months, and a group of 68 evolutionary psychologists issued an open letter titled "Kanazawa's bad science does not represent evolutionary psychology". " Seriously, you must be fucking brain damaged to post this garbage--and just plain stupid to actually believe it. Just as sad the recently exposed cadre of conspiracy trolls here lap it up like little puppies. Absolutely amazing. What a sad pile of detritus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlpineK Posted May 4, 2015 Share Posted May 4, 2015 brain-damaged moderator batting for you here. Way to show true colors douchebag. Making fun of people after accidents is really classy way to go. What's next? Making fun of mentally ill, disabled and handicapped? Who the fuck raised you asshole? Not really shocked to see Fairweather express opinions like this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairweather Posted May 4, 2015 Author Share Posted May 4, 2015 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairweather Posted May 4, 2015 Author Share Posted May 4, 2015 brain-damaged moderator batting for you here. Way to show true colors douchebag. Making fun of people after accidents is really classy way to go. What's next? Making fun of mentally ill, disabled and handicapped? Who the fuck raised you asshole? Not really shocked to see Fairweather express opinions like this. Hmmm, not sure if your lagging performance is the product of your unfortunate encounter with gravity--or forty-plus years of uninterrupted smoke. Either way, you're just not that bright. You're certainly not a moderator. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonG Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 I bet Ted and Hillary get along a lot better than you guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil K Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 You're implying that someone here is even more of a sociopath than Ted Cruz? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonG Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 "We were in Spray, there were too many of us, we had access to too much money, too much equipment, and little by little we went insane." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairweather Posted May 5, 2015 Author Share Posted May 5, 2015 You're implying that someone here is even more of a sociopath than Ted Cruz? Hillary. For sure. Any idea what the Clinton family net worth is up to these days? Anyhow, I'm still hoping for a Rand v Liz race. But I'd settle for Walker v Bernie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.