ivan Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 where's the kid in the flying wheelchair? i'm sorry, but before that sumbitch clinton passed the ADA, space (and imaginativeness) was off-limits to retards and cripples Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 Even Ron Paul disagrees with kevbone  That's just complete nonsense. (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/01/ron-paul-911-conspiracy-theories_n_1178492.html)   Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevbone Posted September 26, 2012 Author Share Posted September 26, 2012 Actually, I have Kev. As regards to the tape "confiscation" I am sure it had to do with the investigation and also was part of security protocols to keep secret the building security as well as the TTPs of the first responders the pentagon has. Â Â In other words....you don't know. You are speculating....just like the rest of us. Â You think you are special? You are cattle just like the rest of us marching off to the slaughter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 How do you know that Kev? What makes YOU so special, you purveyor of knowledge you. WHAT MAKES YOU SO SPECIAL???? Â Is it the bus you ride in? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevbone Posted September 26, 2012 Author Share Posted September 26, 2012 I am not special. We are all marching off to the slaughter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 Even Ron Paul disagrees with kevbone That's just complete nonsense. (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/01/ron-paul-911-conspiracy-theories_n_1178492.html)   It makes me absolutely FURIOUS that Ron Paul is a 7/11 denier! I guess I'm not going to vote for him after all. But then, even if I vote, how do I know my vote is actually used in the results? HOW DO I KNOW MY VOTE IS ACTUALLY USED? Well I've got news for you guys...our votes aren't used. They use something called the Electrical College instead. Its made by Diebold, and the College is bought and paid for by Corporations and Lobbyists. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 I am not special. We are all marching off to the slaughter. Â ah poor kev. you ARE special. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 [video:youtube]6vO-XDUiRqU Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevbone Posted September 26, 2012 Author Share Posted September 26, 2012 Â It makes me absolutely FURIOUS that Ron Paul is a 7/11 denier! I guess I'm not going to vote for him after all. But then, even if I vote, how do I know my vote is actually used in the results? HOW DO I KNOW MY VOTE IS ACTUALLY USED? Well I've got news for you guys...our votes aren't used. They use something called the Electrical College instead. Its made by Diebold, and the College is bought and paid for by Corporations and Lobbyists. Â You sound like a conspiracy theorist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 yes, i'm nuts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 Bush didn't know about the 9/11 attacks. That's rediculous! Everybody knows it was the Jews. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 I am not special. We are all marching off to the slaughter. Â ah poor kev. you ARE special. Â Yes, he is very thpethal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akhalteke Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 Actually, I have Kev. As regards to the tape "confiscation" I am sure it had to do with the investigation and also was part of security protocols to keep secret the building security as well as the TTPs of the first responders the pentagon has. Â Â In other words....you don't know. You are speculating....just like the rest of us. Â You think you are special? You are cattle just like the rest of us marching off to the slaughter. Â Goddamn Kev, AS WAS PREVIOUSLY STATED, the onus is on YOU to prove that conventional wisdom is false; that the only investigation conducted was a fabrication. Â We're waiting.... 16 pages and you still haven't sacked up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevbone Posted September 27, 2012 Author Share Posted September 27, 2012 Goddamn Kev, AS WAS PREVIOUSLY STATED, the onus is on YOU to prove that conventional wisdom is false; that the only investigation conducted was a fabrication. Â We're waiting.... 16 pages and you still haven't sacked up. Â What makes you think the official story is fact? Why does the government get off scott free of having to prove their story? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akhalteke Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Goddamn Kev, AS WAS PREVIOUSLY STATED, the onus is on YOU to prove that conventional wisdom is false; that the only investigation conducted was a fabrication. Â We're waiting.... 16 pages and you still haven't sacked up. Â What makes you think the official story is fact? Why does the government get off scott free of having to prove their story? Â LOL why don't you have to prove yours? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akhalteke Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Goddamn Kev, AS WAS PREVIOUSLY STATED, the onus is on YOU to prove that conventional wisdom is false; that the only investigation conducted was a fabrication. Â We're waiting.... 16 pages and you still haven't sacked up. Â What makes you think the official story is fact? Why does the government get off scott free of having to prove their story? Â Oh, and they did. It was published. YOU just choose to ASSUME that it is false (because distrust of the government is hip and all and shows how smart and counter-culture I am) and have no rationale nor proof. Â If you cannot see why people think you may have a learning disability, you might actually have one... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete_H Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Don't eat the green acid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete_H Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Kev. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete_H Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Kev? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevbone Posted September 27, 2012 Author Share Posted September 27, 2012 Goddamn Kev, AS WAS PREVIOUSLY STATED, the onus is on YOU to prove that conventional wisdom is false; that the only investigation conducted was a fabrication. Â We're waiting.... 16 pages and you still haven't sacked up. Â What makes you think the official story is fact? Why does the government get off scott free of having to prove their story? Â Oh, and they did. It was published. YOU just choose to ASSUME that it is false (because distrust of the government is hip and all and shows how smart and counter-culture I am) and have no rationale nor proof. Â If you cannot see why people think you may have a learning disability, you might actually have one... Â Â It gets published and that makes it fact? Hahahahahaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 I assume you read all 565 pages of the commission report? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
genepires Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 facts get disproved all the time. Then new facts are born. But it takes cold hard evidence to disprove facts. so yes since the attack was published, that is the facts as we know it. Now all it takes is some kind of reliable evidence to change and expose the facts. Where is it? Â that is right, you have none, cause if you did, then the facts of the attack would already be corrected and exposed. So keep on with your distrust of the gubermint but please don't act like you are the one on moral high ground. You just sound like another wackjob teaparty extremist. Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivan Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 when i reflect on this thread all i can hear is the beatles #9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 It gets published and that makes it fact? Hahahahahaha  only if it was published on youtube or prisonplanet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.