Jump to content

Suggestions for 4th/easy 5th class alpine ascents.


khu

Recommended Posts

Looking for some suggestions on alpine climbs around Washington, preferably granite or other solid rock, that are 4th class or easy 5th class for my wife and I to try. We climb sport a lot and aren't big trad climbers. I've got a full set of hex's, nuts and a billion slings. I'm looking for something that's more of a blocky scramble and not so much steep hanging belay type of climb. A short approach would be a plus too. Something to get us started in the alpine stuff.

 

Cheers,

 

Khu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It fails the 'short approach' metric, but the West Ridge of Stuart offers a lot of Class 3 and 4 scrambling, leading to the West Ridge Notch, after which you get about 4 pitches of easy 5th to the summit. It's a long climb, especially if you start pitching it out before the notch.

 

The North Face of Vesper is fun.

West Ridge of Thompson.

The Improbable Traverse on Guye (not sure of the rating).

The scramble route up Cathedral Rock is fun. Probably not 5th though.

 

Ingalls is a long walk in for only two pitches. Pretty area, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, thanks for the suggestions! Doing Adams this weekend (if the weather holds) and will try one of these, possibly, the next week.

 

The approach is not that critical. I don't mind walking, I've just never had a good system to haul my climbing gear. Picked up a mammut neon gear 45 at the REI garage!! So much better for hauling my stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

khu, if you can't fit everything incl climbing gear and overnight gear - pocket rocket, canister, titanium cup, ultra light bag, etc - into a 40L pack, you are taking too much crap.

My wife does overnight alpine trips with a 30L pack, incl climbing shoes, sleeping bag, bivy sack. Something to aim for....

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only bag I had before was a mammut side rope bag, not the best for hiking. It was either that or a 70L backpacking pack, which was not efficient for climbing. This new 45L pack is full with 60m rope, draws, rack, slings two harnesses, and two pairs of shoes. I don't know what I could cut from that line-up and still climb...

 

Solo alpine stuff without a rack, sure I could easily get by on a 30L, but I got this pack for cragging and use on alpine approaches. I guarantee you could not get two individuals climbing gear and overnight gear into a 30L pack. On overnight mountaineering trips I use a 30L pack.

 

Wife will carry a very small overnight pack with food and gear for the night.

 

Edited by khu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

so, if I undertand your situation correctly, in order to do this this stuff with your chosen partner, your wife, you're willing to carry the majority of the stuff? If so, Ok, disregard my comment. I was assuming a 50/50 split between two equal partners. If each partner is carrying 30-40L packs, thats how you get to what I was stating. Finally, rope is almost always outside he pack, not inside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With my wife, yes, I would carry the majority. With a friend it would be a split. The bag has a dedicated rope area, so carrying it inside is not a big deal. It has a rope loop on top, but I hate having stuff outside of packs. I probably just need to figure out the correct method for coiling and attaching it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...