prole Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 j-b in joined by a majority of voters who believe taxes on the rich should return to Clinton era levels. 50+ billion. Not even a dent. What percentage of the defense budget is that, mouth-breather? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Choada_Boy Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 j-b in joined by a majority of voters who believe taxes on the rich should return to Clinton era levels. 50+ billion. Not even a dent. What percentage of the defense budget is that, mouth-breather? You morons would just spend it all anyways... and more. Oh, yeah, FO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvashtarkatena Posted May 27, 2011 Author Share Posted May 27, 2011 Not sure where you get your bad info, but the Bush era tax cuts are the number one largest component of our deficit today - larger than our war debt, even. There's not much controversy over this conclusion...analyzing past data is a bit less error prone than your complete bullshit number. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvashtarkatena Posted May 27, 2011 Author Share Posted May 27, 2011 Yup...more than the next 10 countries combined. Europe's not a country, BTW...just so you know for the future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 (edited) Not sure where you get your bad info, but the Bush era tax cuts are the number one largest component of our deficit today - larger than our war debt, even. There's not much controversy over this conclusion...analyzing past data is a bit less error prone than your complete bullshit number. From your little "balanced budget" survey posted a few weeks ago. Edited May 27, 2011 by KaskadskyjKozak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prole Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 50+ billion. Not even a dent. What percentage of the defense budget is that, mouth-breather? You morons would just spend it all anyways... and more. [/retard-clap] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvashtarkatena Posted May 27, 2011 Author Share Posted May 27, 2011 Causes of the Deficit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvashtarkatena Posted May 27, 2011 Author Share Posted May 27, 2011 Hopefully, the other folks here can differentiate between what caused the deficit and the steps need to fix it going forward. Time value of money, interest, and all that. The Bush tax cuts 10 years ago ballooned the deficit to the point where much larger measures are needed to undo the damage. I could go through an example calculation, but I would hope no one here is moron enough to need one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-spotter Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 Can't you just make that a three piece graph, Oceania, Eastasia and Eurasia? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 22% in 2009 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 The advantage of being a bankrupt nation with a lot of weapons is that you can invade nations with money but no weapons and loot them. there's nothing worth pillaging, looting or raping in canada so what's the fun in an invasion? Your forgetting about their lucrative maple syrup reserves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvashtarkatena Posted May 27, 2011 Author Share Posted May 27, 2011 The oil sands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-spotter Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 Mapoil syrup Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-spotter Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 Come to think of it I'd pay you to come take Nickleback. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bstach Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 Come to think of it I'd pay you to come take Nickleback. And the Toronto Maple Leafs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvashtarkatena Posted May 27, 2011 Author Share Posted May 27, 2011 a) Shitcan the f35. b) Rent the Snowbirds for air support. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvashtarkatena Posted May 27, 2011 Author Share Posted May 27, 2011 "The biggest driver behind the overall design of the JSF is affordability." - Aerospaceweb.org LULZ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlpineK Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 Mapoil syrup Canadian postage stamps come with beavers [img:center]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Q_G8tOtOEpg/TUMEuh5WtRI/AAAAAAAAAKY/fLdTikTmeSs/s400/Threepenny-beaver.jpg[/img] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh Conway Posted May 27, 2011 Share Posted May 27, 2011 Come to think of it I'd pay you to come take Nickleback. And the Toronto Maple Leafs We've a long standing agreement to take the Maple Leafs after they win the Cup. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-spotter Posted May 28, 2011 Share Posted May 28, 2011 That won't occur until Bill Barilko rises as a zombie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joblo7 Posted May 29, 2011 Share Posted May 29, 2011 THAT SHIT IS TO FIGHT THE ALIENS WHEN THEY COME BACK TO FINISH THE JOB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billcoe Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 Gizmondo reports today that the first one (finally) rolled off the the line and flew to it's new Florida home where pilots will soon be training on it in preparation for the production planes to follow. http://gizmodo.com/5822551/the-first-f+35-arrives-to-its-new-home/gallery/ They say nothing in the world can touch it (except for the F-22). That alone should guarantee that Pat can flap his lips and complain for the next 5 years in freedumb and not under another powers repressive thumb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 Gizmondo reports today that the first one (finally) rolled off the the line and flew to it's new Florida home where pilots will soon be training on it in preparation for the production planes to follow. http://gizmodo.com/5822551/the-first-f+35-arrives-to-its-new-home/gallery/ They say nothing in the world can touch it (except for the F-22). That alone should guarantee that Pat can flap his lips and complain for the next 5 years in freedumb and not under another powers repressive thumb. Let's Buy one less plane and use the money to fund the NPS instead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvashtarkatena Posted July 19, 2011 Author Share Posted July 19, 2011 Nothing in the world can touch it? Ahem... It's not a high performance fighter - it's designed to be a modular, 'inexpensive' "bomb truck" for ground troop support, etc, with a low radar sig. Just sayin'. So....why do we need 2500 of these things again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.