JasonG Posted April 10, 2011 Share Posted April 10, 2011 Trip: Ruby - North Slopes Date: 4/8/2011 Trip Report: Powder in April? With a good forecast and reports of prime skiing on north facing slopes, the gang laid plans for a trip to the north side of Ruby. NWAC was being a little pessimistic with their forecast, which I suppose if understandable given the recent accidents and activity, so we all agreed to take it easy and turn around if anything felt off. We started on the Happy Creek trail, following it until skinnable snow was reached (~2800?). We followed the drainage up to about 3400' where we cut hard left with some tricky skinning to gain the NE ridge leading to the summit area. In hindsight, we could have gone straight up the gut, but it is a bit more avi exposed. Popping out on the ridge was pretty glorious, and while tired from the hard work of trailbreaking (thanks to Tim and Scott mostly), we could see the objective still quite a bit above us. We didn't see any signs of recent natural instability, even on very steep and wind loaded terrain. To be safe® we stuck to the mellowest slopes and ribs we could, and all the while the snow seemed well bonded and right side up (at least the most recent layers). It took us about 6.5 hours total to get to the top, and a couple hours back down, including a little extra time spent messing around after I BROKE MY SPLITBOARD. Major bummer, but at least I did it at the end of the good skiing. I was givin' 'er a bit too much and crashed at high speed, breaking the cores of both halves- yikes. I guess nine years is about the life of a splitboard that gets used a good bit. Some careful attention meant I could still use it somewhat, but it was really squirrelly. Oh well, here are some photos of a great day out in the North Cascades. Tricky skinning to gain the ridge: Jack! Ruby, still a long way to go: There is some seriously fine ski terrain on the north side of Ruby, if only I was fitter: There is some pain involved, if the snow is good. Ugh. Logan and Buckner: Snowfield group: Tim dropping in Scott: Kit, enjoying the fruits of our labor: Boot top powder in April for three thousand feet? Yep, we'll take that. We still have a long way to go down from where this photo was taken, even though it is a couple thousand feet below Ruby's summit. The ridge we ascended is visible above the skier. Gear Notes: Any flotation other than snowshoes Approach Notes: After three summits and several attempts of Ruby by different ways, I can honestly say that Happy Creek is the happiest way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan_Miller Posted April 10, 2011 Share Posted April 10, 2011 Many thanks for the TR and fine vistas from an extraordinary viewpoint in maximum snowpack conditions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ospray Posted April 10, 2011 Share Posted April 10, 2011 Thanks. I gotta check that out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparrow Posted April 10, 2011 Share Posted April 10, 2011 Looks like an epic day! Great pics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckaroo Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Hey! No skiing our climbs! J.K. nice pics Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sepultura Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 [i Here is a shot of Heinrich ripping before the board went down...bummer, great trip otherwise, thanks guys! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wastral Posted April 11, 2011 Share Posted April 11, 2011 Heres wishing they had made Ruby into a Ski resort eh? Better than Whistler for scenery IMO. No bias here... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
builder206 Posted April 12, 2011 Share Posted April 12, 2011 Terrific photos, thanks a lot! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan_Miller Posted April 15, 2011 Share Posted April 15, 2011 In the original NPS proposal for North Cascades National Park, a telepherique to the summit of Ruby was planned. Park's people were concerned that the masses couldn't really see any of the alpine splendor. We wouldn't want them to have to put their cervical spines into extension now would we! Luckily cost was prohibitive. And perhaps more importantly the North Cascades Conservation Council lobbied long and hard to counter it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonG Posted April 17, 2011 Author Share Posted April 17, 2011 A gondola or tram would have been bad, but it is not as if the summit has been completely spared. That radio repeater is an abomination, and certainly an annoying sight after all the work to haul yourself up there. I guess if I had my butt saved by a radio assisted park rescue I'd feel differently though . . ... . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom_Sjolseth Posted April 17, 2011 Share Posted April 17, 2011 Oh, I don't know... it doesn't look too bad.. Photos taken 1/19/11 Nice report. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonG Posted April 17, 2011 Author Share Posted April 17, 2011 Ha! I am being a bit grumpy, I suppose. Looks like you had a fine day this winter too, Tom. That's a good bit of work without skis! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan_Miller Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 I'll take the occasional NPS repeator versus the untold masses anytime. There is another one on McGregor Mountain's summit. There may be others, but I can't recall encountering them in thirty five years or so of climbing in the Park. Haven't been up on Copper Ridge, perhaps there's one there as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonG Posted April 19, 2011 Author Share Posted April 19, 2011 I think that there is one on easy instead of copper ridge? . . . .It seems like they could switch to sat phones at some point and remove the repeaters. I agree that they aren't too bad, but it seems like if technology allows, they should still be removed. Same thing with the snotel sites . . .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonG Posted April 19, 2011 Author Share Posted April 19, 2011 You were right Dan- http://parkplanning.nps.gov/document.cfm?parkID=327&projectID=15048&documentID=20910 As an FYI there are now four repeater sites: McGregor, Ruby, Desolation, and Copper. The latter two are at the lookout sites. Sat phones were rejected as an alternative, but were considered. Maybe next go around.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E-rock Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Killer, looks like a great day of skiing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil K Posted May 6, 2011 Share Posted May 6, 2011 Dude! When did you stop being Heinrich? Excellent photos as per usual. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.