Pencil_Pusher Posted March 19, 2002 Share Posted March 19, 2002 Kudos to Mountain Gear's latest catalog and the multitude of specs they've edited. Still Rockcentrics ranges in mm are incorrectly listed. Not even two #9's stacked together could fill the 149mm stated range for that piece.Here's the list I got from Wild Country in May of last year: #3 24-31mm#4 28-36mm#5 33-41mm#6 38-48mm#7 45-55mm#8 52-64mm#9 61-73mm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishstick Posted March 19, 2002 Share Posted March 19, 2002 #9's have a width of 149. GB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pencil_Pusher Posted March 21, 2002 Author Share Posted March 21, 2002 Well, I've held one and the thing is small. Go grab one and hold it next to a #4 Camalot. Besides, that data is exactly what WildCountry sent me, they said it was a formatting error their catalogue designers did not catch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishstick Posted March 21, 2002 Share Posted March 21, 2002 OK, I turned my brain on and measured the width of my fist. 149mm is way out after all. GB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pencil_Pusher Posted March 22, 2002 Author Share Posted March 22, 2002 Holy frijoles! You've got a 149mm fist?! Man, I hope I never get on your wrong side. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.