Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • olyclimber

      WELCOME TO THE CASCADECLIMBERS.COM FORUMS   02/03/18

      We have upgraded to new forum software as of late last year, and it makes everything here so much better!  It is now much easier to do pretty much anything, including write Trip Reports, sell gear, schedule climbing related events, and more. There is a new reputation system that allows for positive contributors to be recognized,  it is possible to tag content with identifiers, drag and drop in images, and it is much easier to embed multimedia content from Youtube, Vimeo, and more.  In all, the site is much more user friendly, bug free, and feature rich!   Whether you're a new user or a grizzled cascadeclimbers.com veteran, we think you'll love the new forums. Enjoy!
Sign in to follow this  
glassgowkiss

republicans= dumb and dumber

Recommended Posts

The Republicans forced fiscal conservatism on Clinton in exchange for concessions on their part.

 

Clinton pledged to balance the budget in 5 years as one of his campaign pledges the first time he ran. I was willing to bet money he wouldn't do it, and that the 5 year time frame was so that he could get reelected and then forget the pledge. However, Clinton surprised a lot of us. As far as the republican involvement on that, sure, congress has that as part of their bailiwick per the constitution. Towards that end of course the dominant party gets plenty of credit.

 

As this forum is designed to be simplistic: here's a walk down memory lane of that process to remember and deepen the complexity and nuances of that time. http://tech.mit.edu/V119/N53/clinton_53.53w.html

 

The last paragraph reinforces my fear of having a single party control both of those branches of the Gov't. "The day’s events underscored how Washington’s divided government -- a Republican-run Congress and Democratic-controlled White House -- enables each party to thwart the other’s major initiatives. Earlier this year Clinton vetoed the GOP’s fiscal centerpiece, a 10-year, $792 billion tax-cut plan".

 

 

Reagan enjoyed a majority controlled Senate to back him up for part of his Presidency (6 years), and it didn't appear to help during budget time when it came time to increase revenue and decrease spending as the reverse happened: he cut revenue and increased spending. When Ronald Reagan entered office in 1981 he repeatedly called for a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution, yet he strangely never got around to submitting a balanced budget himself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just amazed at how out of touch Spray's right-wing is with the mainstream of the Republican Party. Talk about "fringe", whew!

 

What the GOP Really Wants: Obama's Autograph

 

Ever since he began his uphill battle for the Presidency two years ago, Barack Obama has been getting mobbed for photos and autographs, and that enthusiasm and passion has only grown since he entered the Oval Office. But even President Obama must be a little taken aback by the identity of some of his well-wishers on Capitol Hill of late. After his address to Congress last Tuesday, the same House Republicans who had decried his stimulus plan as the work of just another tax-and-spend liberal crowded around him like starstruck tween girls at a Jonas Brothers concert, all just to get his John Hancock on their copy of the speech.

 

Members of Congress have always gotten autographed photos of themselves with the President from bill signings and other events - keepsakes that are then prominently displayed in their offices. It is unusual, though, for representatives and senators to cross the aisle. None of the Democrats I spoke with had anything signed from President Bush - except for Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman, who has five large framed photos of Bush in his office, which probably speaks more to his strained relationship with his own party than any Bush popularity. So why the crossover with Obama? "It reflects the fact that although their leadership is stuck in a negative mode, the Party of No, their membership is more open minded," says Rep. Zoe Lofgren, a California Democrat who had her copy signed so she could frame it and hang it in her offices. "It shows that his attempts to reach across the aisle are having some effect." --more here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Palin... Jindal... I didn't think the GOP's daily soap opera could get any more hilarious -- until Michael Steele had to apologize to Rush Limbaugh after their pissing contest. This stuff goes far beyond satire! :lmao:

 

The cherry on top is the underlying fact that we ultimately have GWB to thank for the demise of what's left of the republican party. :fahq:

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

rush is sooo patriotic:

"During his program Monday, Limbaugh, who used a nearly 1 1/2-hour speech before conservative activists in Washington Saturday to assert that Republicans should want Obama to fail"

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Palin/Krohn in '12. That's 2012, not age 12. Bobby "Lahar" Jindal doesn't stand a chance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think not.

 

Yeeasss, you think not. :yoda:

 

Sorry, this year's award has already been given out. For gems like these there's always next year though...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

What was that thing that Roosevelt had that is widely credited with vitalizing the economy and shortening the Depression? Oh yes, the New Deal.

 

Can you explain how the New Deal reduced unemployment? Specifically, how did FDR's plan bring unemployment numbers back to pre-1929 levels?

 

I have not heard the theory mentioned that FDR's plan was not large enough. That sounds like a fairly standard explanation from a Progressive, though.

 

An excellent book on this subject is 'The Forgotten Man', by Amity Shlaes. She is a financial columnist and takes a non-partisan view (I tried to figure out what "side" she was on, and it was tough).

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

GGK talks a lot of shit about Russians but he acts and talks just like one.

 

Word on the street is that GGK had a lot of Russians in him, as a boy; maybe something rubbed off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

GGK talks a lot of shit about Russians but he acts and talks just like one.

 

Word on the street is that GGK had a lot of Russians in him, as a boy; maybe something rubbed off.

just like your mom? :ass:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

×