Jump to content

Democrat Has Affair


prole

Recommended Posts

How's that for a shocking development?! Why aren't you spineless liberals denouncing this hypocritical flip-flopping ADULTERER?! I'm simply outraged. And for this to happen in the same district that pedophiliac Republican Mark Foley was ousted from when it was revealed he was writing pornographic letters to an underage page. I mean, you guys were all over that! Where's the outrage?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I just can't respect a man who ran on a family values campaign to replace a Republican pedophile that stalked young boys in his employ over the internet to induce them into committing acts of sodomy and then turns around and cheats on his wife. Disgraceful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for telling us how to feel. I'll pass on the outrage you suggest for this one however.

 

Having sex with underage boys or girls would outrage me, especially if they worked under you, but this woman was 50. In fact I think I may pity the guy. At least Clinton had the younger (but legal) women lined up. I couldn't get worked up for that either. Not Monical Lewinski, not Jenifer Flowers, not Paula Jones, not the chicks he was doing in the back seat of the Arkansa governors limo....OK< wait, that one pissed me off, cause he wanted a state trooper to lie about it. That was bullshit. The rest were not worthy of anger or even a tepid response from me, however, I can understand and sympathize with Hillary throwing the plates at him over it. :noway:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just can't respect a man who ran on a family values campaign to replace a Republican pedophile that stalked young boys in his employ over the internet to induce them into committing acts of sodomy and then turns around and cheats on his wife. Disgraceful.

 

I call bullshit. Republicans have a trademark on the Family Values platform. I'm pretty sure that the Dems run on the "I'll fuck anything of legal age" platform.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look, here's a guy who ran on a message of virtue after his predecessor, a Republican, was forced out in shame when it was found out he liked to have sex with young boys. Really, I mean how hypocritical is that?!

 

Legal vs. Illegal. Private life vs. banging little boys at work. STFU and move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh come on people! The centerpiece of this man's campaign was the criticism of the fact that his predecessor, a Republican, was enticing his male underage employees (children, really) into having having sex with him and then tried to cover it up with the help of the Florida GOP. Now that's what I call a flip-flopper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for telling us how to feel. I'll pass on the outrage you suggest for this one however.

 

Having sex with underage boys or girls would outrage me, especially if they worked under you, but this woman was 50. In fact I think I may pity the guy. At least Clinton had the younger (but legal) women lined up. I couldn't get worked up for that either. Not Monical Lewinski, not Jenifer Flowers, not Paula Jones, not the chicks he was doing in the back seat of the Arkansa governors limo....OK< wait, that one pissed me off, cause he wanted a state trooper to lie about it. That was bullshit. The rest were not worthy of anger or even a tepid response from me, however, I can understand and sympathize with Hillary throwing the plates at him over it. :noway:

 

How about Barney Frank running an underage homosexual prostitution ring out of his apartment? How did he get a pass on that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about Barney Frank running an underage homosexual prostitution ring out of his apartment? How did he get a pass on that?

 

Good question. Here's the answer from Wikipedia:

 

In 1990, the House voted to reprimand Frank when it was revealed that Steve Gobie, a male escort whom Frank had befriended after hiring him through a personal advertisement, claimed to have conducted an escort service from Frank's apartment when he was not at home. Frank had dismissed Gobie earlier that year and reported the incident to the House Ethics Committee after learning of Gobie's activities. After an investigation, the House Ethics Committee found no evidence that Frank had known of or been involved in the alleged illegal activity.[2] Regarding Gobie's more scandalous claims the report by the Ethics Committee concluded, "In numerous instances where an assertion made by Mr. Gobie (either publicly or during his Committee deposition) was investigated for accuracy, the assertion was contradicted by third-party sworn testimony or other evidence of Mr. Gobie himself."[3]

 

The New York Times reported on July 20, 1990, that the House Ethics Committee recommended "that Representative Barney Frank receive a formal reprimand from the House for his relationship with a male prostitute."[4] Attempts to expel or censure Frank, led by Republican member Larry Craig (who himself was later embroiled in his own homosexual scandal), failed.[5][6] Rather, the House voted 408-18 to reprimand him.[7] This condemnation was not reflected in Frank's district, where he won re-election in 1990 with 66 percent of the vote, and has won by larger margins ever since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How'bout posting a link before I give you a head-butt?

Hey Joe! Did you get the good news yet? The U.S. Supreme Court has spoken in your favor! By virtue of unanimous decision, the court told the Ohio GOP to go fuck itself. And by virtue of the court's supremacy in the same decision, you get to vote in the upcoming election. Congratulations!

 

Uh, you do know how to vote, don't you?

Edited by Crux
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about Barney Frank running an underage homosexual prostitution ring out of his apartment? How did he get a pass on that?

 

Good question. Here's the answer from Wikipedia:

 

In 1990, the House voted to reprimand Frank when it was revealed that Steve Gobie, a male escort whom Frank had befriended after hiring him through a personal advertisement, claimed to have conducted an escort service from Frank's apartment when he was not at home. Frank had dismissed Gobie earlier that year and reported the incident to the House Ethics Committee after learning of Gobie's activities. After an investigation, the House Ethics Committee found no evidence that Frank had known of or been involved in the alleged illegal activity.[2] Regarding Gobie's more scandalous claims the report by the Ethics Committee concluded, "In numerous instances where an assertion made by Mr. Gobie (either publicly or during his Committee deposition) was investigated for accuracy, the assertion was contradicted by third-party sworn testimony or other evidence of Mr. Gobie himself."[3]

 

The New York Times reported on July 20, 1990, that the House Ethics Committee recommended "that Representative Barney Frank receive a formal reprimand from the House for his relationship with a male prostitute."[4] Attempts to expel or censure Frank, led by Republican member Larry Craig (who himself was later embroiled in his own homosexual scandal), failed.[5][6] Rather, the House voted 408-18 to reprimand him.[7] This condemnation was not reflected in Frank's district, where he won re-election in 1990 with 66 percent of the vote, and has won by larger margins ever since.

 

The old "I didn't know!" defense. Probably not the only jizz you've been swallowing these days. Your Wiki article had some interesting things to say about Frank and the banking fiasco:

 

Government Sponsored Housing

 

"Frank has received campaign contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac—$42,350 between 1989 and 2008–which some critics claim have influenced his support of their lending programs. Frank's former partner, Herb Moses, was an executive at Fannie Mae from 1991 to 1998, where he helped develop many of Fannie Mae’s affordable housing and home improvement lending programs. The relationship ended around the same time Moses left the company; Frank's support of Fannie and Freddy predated and continued past that relationship.[8]

 

In 1991, Frank pushed for reduced restriction on two- and three-family home mortgages[9] In September 2003, Frank opposed Bush administration proposals for increasing oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by creating an independent agency to supervise. The proposal would have moved oversight from Congress and the Department of Housing and Urban Development to the new agency. Frank stated in 2003, "The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing." [10] In 2008, Frank reiterated this opinion, calling Republican criticism of the Community Reinvestment Act in light of the nation's housing crisis a veiled attack on the poor that's racially motivated.[11] In July 2008, Frank stated Fannie and Freddy were fundamentally sound and not in danger of going under, cautioning however, that they were "not the best investments these days"[12]"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...