Jump to content

Valdez judgment overturned by Supreme Court


billcoe

Recommended Posts

Link

 

" WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday threw out the record $2.5 billion in punitive damages that Exxon Mobil Corp (XOM.N) had been ordered to pay for the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill off Alaska, the nation's worst tanker spill.

ADVERTISEMENT

 

By a 5-3 vote, the high court ruled that the punitive damages award should be slashed -- limited by the circumstances of the case to an amount equal to the total relevant compensatory damages of $507.5 million."

 

......................lots more, read the link for full text.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The good news in all of this is that Prince William Sound (having just spent 10 days there) appears to have healed itself to become the pristine place it was before the spill. It's pretty amazing to go to a place on the ocean these days almost devoid of beach garbage, hardened campsites, even fire rings. The wildlife there; fish, seabirds, bears, whales, seals, otters, to name a few, is abundant and vigorous. Paddling there is like traveling through an asian brush painting; mist, bonzai trees, sculpted rock...amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's helpful to understand the enormity of the damage caused by the spill. Prince William Sound, an enormous area, represents less than 10% of the total severely affected area:

 

2611647912_6af08b3606_o.jpg

 

The Supreme Court should have returned the case to the lower court. Today's high court is not the proper place to second guess a non-Constitutional decision taken in the context of what was happening over two decades ago. In these days when 13 billion dollars simply dissappears, unaccounted for, in Iraq, 2 billion for such widespread damage seems like a drop in the bucket for one of the wealthiest companies in the world, and one that is currently enjoying record high profits.

 

Considering how often we discover how corporate negligence damages public health and the environment, it seems to be in the public interest to provide a strong incentive for corporations to invest in preventing such catastrophes in the future. Hopefully, after three decades of slash and burn politics, which has brought us to the brink of environmental and economic disaster, we'll adopt a more balanced approach in the future.

 

Probably not. Human action in the aggregate isn't much wiser than bacteria.

 

Edited by tvashtarkatena
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The good news in all of this is that Prince William Sound (having just spent 10 days there) appears to have healed itself to become the pristine place it was before the spill.

 

Did you visit PWS before the spill?

 

I did. From what I've heard, the place has NOT "healed itself to become the pristine place it was before the spill". I'm curious to hear what your basis for that statement is.

 

PWS had the most incredible salmon fishing I've ever seen. My family used to catch our limit (5 pinks/person/day) in about 15 minutes. It was nuts. The quantity of wildlife there was stunning. Bears, otters, FLOCKS of bald eagles, blueberries, moose...

 

The oil spill was heartbreaking for me, but I'm sure my pain is nothing compared to the folks whose livelihood and spiritual center was found in those waters. This court decision just twists the knife a bit more.

 

Sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

meanwhile profits are really high at Exxon!

 

I think Exxon could have done a good PR move and just paid the amount....last quarter...and settled the case and admitted wrongdoing. then they might not be under so much public heat these days with their profits.

 

but what the hell do I know. check out your 401Ks. Every single one of my 401Ks have Exxon stock. So, go ahead and rape me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The good news in all of this is that Prince William Sound (having just spent 10 days there) appears to have healed itself to become the pristine place it was before the spill.

 

I'm curious to hear what your basis for that statement is.

 

I don't think I could have been much clearer.

 

Correct. It's clear you lack the necessary objectivity for your statement.

 

What's new?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The good news in all of this is that Prince William Sound (having just spent 10 days there) appears to have healed itself to become the pristine place it was before the spill. It's pretty amazing to go to a place on the ocean these days almost devoid of beach garbage, hardened campsites, even fire rings. The wildlife there; fish, seabirds, bears, whales, seals, otters, to name a few, is abundant and vigorous. Paddling there is like traveling through an asian brush painting; mist, bonzai trees, sculpted rock...amazing.

 

YOu are wrong. Absolutely.

the Sea otter populations are suffering! look just out side of PWS around the Copper River delta, and you can see what the population should be like.

 

There has not been Roe Herring fishery sence the Oil Spill and no sight of one anytime in the future because there are not enough fish herring to support a fishery.

 

Herring is a staple for the wild life in the ocean that you can not see!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go Exxon.

 

 

 

So the courts have finally settled these punitive damages for the oil spill.

20 years ago a trial jury found Exxon guilty and the damages were based at 5 Billion dollars. That is 5,000,000,000!

 

I guess at that time Exxon set aside the money in a trust, don’t know for sure, but guess that is what they did or had to do.

 

Then Exxon started the appeals process.

 

The first appeal lowered it to 2.5 Billion dollars.

 

They appealed again, and this time it went all the way to the Supreme Court.

 

Ready?

 

$500 Million! That is it. That is all.

 

A friend of mine had to totally change his occupation because of the Exxon mess.

 

So at 5 Billion it should have been something like 150K per person.

At 2.5 Billion it was 75K per person.

At 500 Million it is only 15,000 per person; to lose your livelihood.

 

This is a travesty of justice.

 

Assuming that Exxon did in fact set aside the 5 Billion 20 years ago, and assume over the past 20 years they returned a modest return of 4%, then Exxon would have earned $5,955,615,715 in interest over the past 20 years.

 

Less the puny punitive damages awarded by the courts, so their interest earned is $5,455,615,715

 

Exxon sucks!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can anyone that think that Exxon winning this case is a good thing???? At what point can the government draw a line between special interests of big business and the rights of those which had their lives totally uprooted by this disaster.

 

20 years and Trillions in profit later...Exxon gets to walk away without any real concequences...

 

sad really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...