G-spotter Posted November 12, 2007 Share Posted November 12, 2007 New article in the latest ish of Scientific American on the effects of crustal heat fluxes on topography contains this gem: "Were it not for the effects of a cold slab of subducting oceanic plate that insulates it from the hotter mantle underneath, the average elevation of Seattle would be 1,813 meters (5,949 feet) above sea level." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomtom Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 It's all Bush's fault. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 New article in the latest ish of Scientific American on the effects of crustal heat fluxes on topography contains this gem: "Were it not for the effects of a cold slab of subducting oceanic plate that insulates it from the hotter mantle underneath, the average elevation of Seattle would be 1,813 meters (5,949 feet) above sea level." We were robbed! We could be living in alpine meadows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
builder206 Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 Imagine the size of the container cranes down at the port. It would take weeks to unload a ship if you had to lift each container a mile. And how would Todd Shipyards launch a new hull, send it over a waterfall? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 Imagine the size of the container cranes down at the port. It would take weeks to unload a ship if you had to lift each container a mile. And how would Todd Shipyards launch a new hull, send it over a waterfall? ooh, a 5000+ foot waterfall. Excellent kayaking run... and maybe we'd get some frozen WI in the winter right in our back yards... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 subduction leads to orgeny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Trippett Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
builder206 Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 subduction leads to orgeny "orogeny" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archenemy Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 All you spell check fuckers ought to just have your own running thread where you can correct others' spelling to your hearts' content. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Rooster Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 All you spell check fuckers ought to just have your own running thread where you can correct others' spelling to your hearts' content. I may be wrong, but I believe the correct grammer should be "All of you spell check fuckers..." But what do I know? I'm just a chicken. COCK A DOODLE DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catbirdseat Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 New article in the latest ish of Scientific American on the effects of crustal heat fluxes on topography contains this gem: "Were it not for the effects of a cold slab of subducting oceanic plate that insulates it from the hotter mantle underneath, the average elevation of Seattle would be 1,813 meters (5,949 feet) above sea level." Dru, would you care to explain this to us non-geologists? If it were not for the insulating effect, the continental plate above would be hotter, would it not? How would this lead to a greater elevation? Is it simply that warm rock is less dense and therefore would be more bouyant? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
builder206 Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 All you spell check fuckers ought to just have your own running thread where you can correct others' spelling to your hearts' content. I may be wrong, but I believe the correct grammer should be "All of you spell check fuckers.. "grammar" Kids, notice archenemy's correct use of the plural possessive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Rooster Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 All you spell check fuckers ought to just have your own running thread where you can correct others' spelling to your hearts' content. I may be wrong, but I believe the correct grammer should be "All of you spell check fuckers.. "grammar" :anger: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noliquidity Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 All you spell check fuckers ought to just have your own running thread where you can correct others' spelling to your hearts' content. Damn...... there is enough sand up there to make a beach!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 All you spell check fuckers ought to just have your own running thread where you can correct others' spelling to your hearts' content. I intentionally don't proofread my posts - it gives the spell-checking, fuckwad losers something to do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvashtarkatena Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 New article in the latest ish of Scientific American on the effects of crustal heat fluxes on topography contains this gem: "Were it not for the effects of a cold slab of subducting oceanic plate that insulates it from the hotter mantle underneath, the average elevation of Seattle would be 1,813 meters (5,949 feet) above sea level." In short: The deeper the trench, the smaller the bulge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-spotter Posted November 13, 2007 Author Share Posted November 13, 2007 New article in the latest ish of Scientific American on the effects of crustal heat fluxes on topography contains this gem: "Were it not for the effects of a cold slab of subducting oceanic plate that insulates it from the hotter mantle underneath, the average elevation of Seattle would be 1,813 meters (5,949 feet) above sea level." Dru, would you care to explain this to us non-geologists? If it were not for the insulating effect, the continental plate above would be hotter, would it not? How would this lead to a greater elevation? Is it simply that warm rock is less dense and therefore would be more bouyant? buy the fucking magazine like i did, cheapskate! or get mckillop drunk you forgot that warm rock expands too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E-rock Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 (edited) Catbirdseat - you are considering only the density of the continental crust and any density differential that would occur due to heating. However, the entire lithospheric rock column below Seattle includes a cold, dense oceanic slab, which, if removed, would greatly increase the bouyancy of the overlying continental crust, because it is currently thinner and hotter than average continental crust. The statement in Sci-American is b.s. for a number of reasons. 1. If not for the subducting slab in the PNW - there would BE NO FUCKING MOUNTAINS. 2. Continental crust along passive margins - i.e. where there is no active subduction - is significantly cooler, often thicker, and always MORE dense than continental crust along an active margin, like the PNW. 3. If Seattle were at 5000' of elevation, the coastline would exist significantly further to the west of its current location. Continents don't drop off abruptly. If the slab didn't exist the entire make-up of the continental margin would be different. 4. If you want to know what Seattle would be like without a subducting slab, come to New York. Edited November 13, 2007 by E-rock Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-spotter Posted November 13, 2007 Author Share Posted November 13, 2007 Whatever beeyotch. Read the article! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 THIS IS PURE SPECULATION I'M NOT A GEOLOGIST NOR AM I A MEDICAL DOCTOR BUT PERHAPS THIS BLACK HOLE OF SUCK IS CAUSE BY THE GAPING MAW OF ANTI-INTELLECTUALISM OF THOSE THAT ARE FULL OF SCHIST? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 sorry, that won't happen again. till the next time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bug Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 You are a lot more fun lately. Kind of reminds me of the old CC.COM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 This would make for a more challenging bike commute. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClimbingPanther Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 You are a lot more fun lately. Kind of reminds me of the old CC.COM. he is the best poster? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.