Jim Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 No good answer to this simple question: What good has been done by the invasion? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JosephH Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 You seem utterly dense on how this all works. Staying makes us less safe by showing China we don't have the will to succeed. Leaving makes us less safe because we will have simply helped out Iran, stirred up a hornet's nest, and then walked away. That's why it was completely ignorant to invade Iraq in the first place. Â This is fucking rich! The same semantic, parsing bullshit brought to us by Bubba! I'm gonna frame your comment, and whenever I need a good laugh, pull it out. Â Look, I don't know you well enough to say whether you're a complete f#cking idiot or not, but if you can't parse the truth out of that semantic bullshit then you're making the answer to that question pretty obvious. Hell, maybe you'd like to enlighten us as to exactly how the war has helped make us more secure and lay out your 'solution' to the way forward - you clearly didn't read or understand mine... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archenemy Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 you cannot defines omething you cantf athom. openness is lacking. can I have a poster of that for my wall? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted October 3, 2007 Author Share Posted October 3, 2007 hahhahahahahahhahahahah ahaha aha ha ahahahahhah hah aha ahaaaah aha hhahah aha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sexual_chocolate Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 (edited) Â and your logic is the one in need of remedial education, sir. if our presence in Iraq makes us "less safe" as you and your ilk periodically vomit in some anti-war thread, then clearly the effect of our leaving would be to make us more safe. Â Â Damn dude, i don't have the time to try to educate a magna cum filled laude pastry boy in basic variable and non-variable logic. goddamnit, one more try: Â A situation exists. Non-static of course (is anything ever? Even the variable x, post-value defined?), but let's pretend it's relatively stable. Iraq, for instance. ok fucked up situation, but clearly not a threat to anyone: no weaponry, poor army, eradicated infrastructure, high infant mortality rate (thanks to clinton's siege; perhaps he was softening them up for Bush? Booga Booga!). Â So the US goes in, and it's a conflagration. A "terrorist" recruiter's wet dream. I mean this is better than hundreds of virgins in heaven. US servicemen and women die, BY THE THOUSANDS; ask them if things are more dangerous. Our entry CREATED this danger. Very clear. It's a catalyst, nitroglycerin. The chain of events is already set off. It doesn't logically follow (why do you insist it does?) that a sudden departure would somehow bring back an initial set-point? It can't, since that set-point has long since disappeared. We can talk about what effect a sudden departure might have, but it's not a question of the false (non-) logical progression that you present. Â Your "logic" is incoherent, and your argument is tendentious. Edited October 3, 2007 by sexual_chocolate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dechristo Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 spot-on nice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 It doesn't logically follow (why do you insist it does?) that a sudden departure would somehow bring back an initial set-point? It can't, since that set-point has long since disappeared. Â 1. I never said it logically followed 2. my point, you obtuse dipshit, is that is what is IMPLIED by the simplistic sound-bite rhetoric of the anti-war crowd. "we are less safe now" is quickly followed by "withdrawal timeline" and "get the boys home". The implication is intentional - the demagoguery to deceive through simplistic assertion and innuendo reinforced with repetition. Â And fuck off with your tangential barbs. Unlike that moron ass clown No. 13 whatever who is clearly a few dozen IQ points lower than Bush, I've never maintained that you fall in that category. The thread you cite with your pathetic barbs was meant to put him in his place - which it did. All you do is drop to the level of a moron, which you clearly aren't, whatever your personal academic credentials may be. Â Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sexual_chocolate Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 And fuck off with your tangential barbs. Â Â So direct barbs, such as the ones you fling at me, are ok, Mr. magna cum filled laude pastry boy? Â Hypocritical russian. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 We have to go in because it's, a, well, TERRORIST HAVEN!  ........roll blunder tape   We can't leave because,well, it's a, TERRORIST HAVEN!  Repeat ad nausem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 And fuck off with your tangential barbs. Â Â So direct barbs, such as the ones you fling at me, are ok, Mr. magna cum filled laude pastry boy? Â the only thing filled with cum is your bunghole, you fudge-packing, pseudo-intellectual troll. Â Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClimbingPanther Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 I nearly spewed my peanut butter & jelly sandwich all over my computer! You are my favorite person EVAR, archy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sexual_chocolate Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 We have to go in because it's, a, well, TERRORIST HAVEN! ........roll blunder tape   We can't leave because,well, it's a, TERRORIST HAVEN!  Repeat ad nausem.  Surely you realize that terrorism never played a role in this? It was about oil, with some attendant contingencies of various relevance. Pretty simple, really.  And what the fuck am I doing babbling about this self-evident shit anyways?  OUT! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archenemy Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 I nearly spewed my peanut butter & jelly sandwich all over my computer! You are my favorite person EVAR, archy. Don't you just love the internet? Â I *love* PB&J. Yummmy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dt_3pin Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 you cannot defines omething you cantf athom. openness is lacking. can I have a poster of that for my wall? Â Thanks for the new avatar pic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JosephH Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 the only thing filled with cum is your bunghole, you fudge-packing, pseudo-intellectual troll. Â God, I love it when you get all up and O'Reilly - it brings out the real you... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 the only thing filled with cum is your bunghole, you fudge-packing, pseudo-intellectual troll. Â God, I love it when you get all up and O'Reilly - it brings out the real you... Â this is spray Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dechristo Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 you cannot defines omething you cantf athom. openness is lacking. can I have a poster of that for my wall? Â Thanks for the new avatar pic. Â pity the script is inscrutable in avatar size Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClimbingPanther Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 makes for a good inside jok ethough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dechristo Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 you cannot defines omething you cantf athom. openness is lacking. can I have a poster of that for my wall?  Thanks for the new avatar pic.  pity the script is inscrutable in avatar size  Ha! But, "inscrutable" is appropriate! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 makes for a good inside jok ethough  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No. 13 Baby Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 Damn dude, i don't have the time to try to educate a magna cum filled laude pastry boy in basic variable and non-variable logic.  Homeboy is also allegedly a member of Phi Beta Kappa  Stage II: when you get the better of him on a regular basis, Tucker will pretend to put you on ignore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joblo7 Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 you cannot defines omething you cantf athom. openness is lacking. can I have a poster of that for my wall? Â it worked!!! you are reading what i wrote a few times......just changing on erule did it. Â thanks arch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dechristo Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 clueless Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 clueless  V7 and Kevbone - twins separated at birth? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joblo7 Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 blackwater is a republican-backin'-religious right-fanatic-supportin' ,mercenary force. Â disgrace to the ideals of freedom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.