Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • olyclimber

      WELCOME TO THE CASCADECLIMBERS.COM FORUMS   02/03/18

      We have upgraded to new forum software as of late last year, and it makes everything here so much better!  It is now much easier to do pretty much anything, including write Trip Reports, sell gear, schedule climbing related events, and more. There is a new reputation system that allows for positive contributors to be recognized,  it is possible to tag content with identifiers, drag and drop in images, and it is much easier to embed multimedia content from Youtube, Vimeo, and more.  In all, the site is much more user friendly, bug free, and feature rich!   Whether you're a new user or a grizzled cascadeclimbers.com veteran, we think you'll love the new forums. Enjoy!
Sign in to follow this  
JERRY_SANCHEZ

Bigger, Better Snoqualmie Envisioned

Recommended Posts

Seattle's backyard ski area could grow by a third in the next several years, with more lifts, more terrain, three times more restaurant seating and better parking.

 

Expansion proposed for the Summit at Snoqualmie, with its four adjacent ski areas, could accommodate a third more visitors and make it easier for skiers and snowboarders to traverse the resort, according to plans that have been endorsed by the Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest.

 

Before the changes could occur, however, the private ski area would have to buy 400 acres of wildlife-rich private timberland next door and donate it to the government to link the forests of the south Cascades with those to the north of Interstate 90.

 

Some expansion plans "go through one of the largest and last remaining pieces of old-growth forest in that north-south corridor," said Sonny Paz, a wildlife biologist for the Mount Baker-Snoqualmie forest who reviewed the ski area's plans. "Over time, the land donation should mitigate the loss of the habitat that the ski area's trying to develop."

 

The Forest Service has been evaluating expansion plans for the Summit, portions of which have served skiers since the early 1930s , for six years. The agency's draft review of those plans was released last week.

 

But the proposal comes as scientists increasingly have been suggesting that the future of midelevation ski areas such as Snoqualmie Summit may hinge on the weather.

 

A recent study by the University of Washington's Climate Impacts Group indicated that even with an average temperature increase of just a few degrees, snow levels at Snoqualmie Pass would rise 500 feet. The group's computer models show that the length of an average ski season could decline 28 percent in the next 20 years.

 

Those predictions aren't lost on the ski industry.

 

"Certainly we're all sort of looking at issues that relate to global warming," said Tim Beck, executive vice president for planning for Booth Creek Resorts, which owns the Summit. "We all recognize there are things happening out there we have to be aware of."

 

But Beck said those possibilities have not factored into planning at the Summit.

 

"It's sort of like farming," Beck said. "Every year the weather is different. But I've been involved with the Summit for eight years, and most of the time we've had pretty good snow."

 

For now, Summit managers want to better control the flow of people among the four areas — Summit West, Summit Central, Summit East and Alpental.

 

They're proposing two new chairlifts through a heavily wooded section of the Central and East summits. They also want to connect the two areas with steeper cat trails so snowboarders, who tend to avoid traversing flat ground, can better access both summits.

 

Because that section is thick with old-growth, the Forest Service has "urged them to reduce development to gladed runs, which are more difficult to groom, but leaves more trees standing," said Larry Donovan, who led the review for the Forest Service.

 

No northern spotted owls — now protected under the Endangered Species Act — have been spotted in that area in years, but Paz said he still thinks the birds may hunt there.

 

The resort already has made arrangements with Plum Creek Timber to buy and donate forestland near the resort to replace the loss of those trees if plans are approved, he said.

 

The Summit also would consolidate facilities at the bases of the Central and West summits, offering an additional 10 acres of parking and 2,800 more restaurant seats, and making 140 more acres available for night skiing.

 

The proposal also would add two more chairlifts to Alpental, allowing expert skiers to stay higher on the mountain. And it would open more terrain there to intermediate skiing.

 

The public may comment on the proposal until mid-February.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't imagine wanting to invest in a ski area that may not have any real use for skiing in 10 or 20 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
YYYEEEEAAAAHHHH!!!! fruit.gif

 

????????????

It's still just Snoqualmie Pass. Rainy and fucked up most of the time. Most of the "new" terrain will be between Snoqualmie and Ski Acres. Or Ski Acres and Hyak. Same differnce, BFD. It will still be a half-assed beginners area.

Edited by crazyjz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I second Josh. With the rate of global warming, it'll be a rainforest/garden area within the forseeable future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like Alpental small as it is, but the Summit wants to market it more aggressively ("Schralp the Alp!") since it's the only real terrain there. Restaurant seats in the other areas are sorely needed indeed.

 

drC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I refuse to be a crotchety, pessimistic asshole like CrazyJZ.the_finger.gif And beginners need their runs too. Though Josh is likely to be right. But any addition to the pass ski areas to me is an improvement. And the ski area agreed to purchase 400 nearby acres of private timber and donate it to the Forest Service. So cheers all around. bigdrink.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, with all the places that lift served skiing can expand, it might as well be the south side of snoqualmie pass. It's a fun playground, but it would be a stretch to call it 'scenic' when compared to the rest of the Cascades. I would much rather see them tear up that area then anything around the other ski ares, Alpental included.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

×