Jump to content

Washington Crack Workshop


Squid

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

In Squamish some of the best 5.9 cracks I've climbed are located at the far end of The Papoose. Laid Back is 70' of grunty hands and Mushroom is a sustained thin hand crack. Mercury Vapor looks excellent as well. In the Smoke Bluffs these routes would be more popular than Penny Lane, at the Papoose they go begging for climbers. Check them out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there are some awsome cracks in the lower gorge as well

i don't really know their names, cuel sister? blood clot vector are the only ones i've done.

 

Yes the cracks at the lower gorge are nice. however, climbing basalt cracks doesn't require the technique that granite cracks do. so for a crack workshop climbing granite cracks is the way to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rumr is right about some of the Oregon cracks being so damn good for jamming. How do you think Watts became the best crack climber in the states back in the 80’s? Bill’s list is full of fun climbs but Lion’s Chair and Sunshine aren’t what I would really call crack routes. If I was trying to learn to jam, I’d head to the Gorge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Central Oregon crack climbing is excellent but it's sweet spot is in the solid 5.10 -5.11 range. Great for tuning up or getting in shape but not really beginner territory. That said, the lower gorge is the place to start with some nice easier routes that, as pointed out, don't require pure jamming technique ( but allow you to work on it.) Then head to the outlying areas for jamming nirvana.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harry last time I checked Indian Creek was sandstone and no one mentioned climbing sandstone here.

 

My reasons behind the granite/basalt statements are

1.Granite is slabbier in general and so requires better footwork and/or better technique.

2. in general there are more features for feet in the lower gorge and at tieton than at index/leavenworth. So I find myself high stepping less.

3. You can just stem a lot of basalt cruxes, this ties in with #2.

4. I onsight harder at the lower gorge/tieton than I due at index/leavenworth and I climb at index/leavenworth way more so I attribute that to my shitty technique/footwork

Link to comment
Share on other sites

slabby is irrelevant if talking about pure crack climbing...ie, your talking about foot placement in cracks and jamming in cracks...so the slabbier the easier in pure crack climbing...

 

face is different; however, this topic is about CRACK...

 

 

 

when exactly do you highstep in a crack? confused.gif

 

regarding your onsighting "harder" in one place or another could just mean that the ratings are not correlated between the areas...or another way of putting it is that a squamish "5.10a" is really just an index 5.9 in disguise...blah blah blah

 

Edited by RuMR
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know what eric8 is talking about.

 

The lower gorge at Smith is the closest thing you'll see to sandstone splitters in the Northwest. Try fingerlocking in one of those motherfuckers versus some sweet-ass Squamish finger crack.

 

In general, the steeper the climbing, the more important it is to have good footwork. For straight in jamming, like the kind we all MEAN when we're talking about pure crack climbing, footwork is a bit less of an issue than it is when face climbing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The basalt cracks have so much more variation to them (on average, exceptions occur) that I think they force you to learn a lot of different ways to position your hands in them. The granite cracks are generally smoother and you can repeat the same jam a few times before the width changes and you have to change. Granite cracks are more enjoyable to be sure but basalt cracks can definitely be more problematic.

Added: I'd rather climb a nice 5.8 granite handcrack like Dogleg than a 5.8 basalt handcrack like First Blood

Edited by Drederek
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Added: I'd rather climb a nice 5.8 granite handcrack like Dogleg than a 5.8 basalt handcrack like First Blood"

 

Hmmmm.. Dogleg is perfect hands for me and First Blood is wider than my fists and was probably the scariest/hardest thing I led last year!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Added: I'd rather climb a nice 5.8 granite handcrack like Dogleg than a 5.8 basalt handcrack like First Blood

 

First Blood, hand crack?

yelrotflmao.gifyelrotflmao.gifyelrotflmao.gifyelrotflmao.gifyelrotflmao.gifyelrotflmao.gifyelrotflmao.gifyelrotflmao.gif

A good joke perpetrated by the guidebook authors. No "hand crack" requires a #3 or larger camalot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice job on Supercrack; I don't think too many have sent that. You'll certainly like some of our grad level fissures here in central oregon. In particular, I think you should check out Redsides. I'd be honored to hold your rope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Added: I'd rather climb a nice 5.8 granite handcrack like Dogleg than a 5.8 basalt handcrack like First Blood"

 

Hmmmm.. Dogleg is perfect hands for me and First Blood is wider than my fists and was probably the scariest/hardest thing I led last year!

Maybe I was thinking of Mushmaker and was fooled by guidebook authors when I looked it up... scariest/hardest brings the memories back... I do recall some sideways fists now smile.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...