Jump to content

Pat Robertson, serial lunatic or just plain folks?


foraker

Is he?  

132 members have voted

  1. 1. Is he?

    • 1505
    • 1505


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

the guy was voted in.

 

not once but multiple times in spite of our funding of a recall. it'd probably be difficult to find a more representative gvt in latin america today.

 

Oh yea -that "national interest" thing. Read - oil.

 

oh! you mean it's not the defense of individual liberty ... pinochet style hahaha.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...like Pal Pot? Mao? Mugabe?

 

In at least two of these instances, "agrarian reform" was shortly followed by the appearance of mass graves.

 

the most amazing part is that someone supporting regimes that have murdered 100,000's in latin america would make such remarks.

 

and for the record i have never supported any such regimes or any other that look like them. there, it's settled, we can move away from the smears and the wingnut rhetoric!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the choir of "it was inappropriate" was priceless as well. i wonder if in the future, hatemongers calling for the murder of elected officials will receive notes from the fbi calling them on their "inappropriate" remarks. crazy.gif

 

so will the FTC investigate? or is janet jackson's boob a greater threat to family values?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They'll politely say the guy is a looney but they nevertheless agree with him (like fairweather did). More than religion per se it's 21th century 'manifest destiny'. They insist in continuing to see latin america as their backyard which is probably not possible anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PI editorial, i am impressed!

 

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/237862_pated.asp

 

Thursday, August 25, 2005

 

Extreme Politics: American fatwa

 

SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER EDITORIAL BOARD

 

When they're talking in their hard-to-learn native language to devoted followers, religious extremists feel free to say some pretty horrifying things on TV in the Middle East. And the Middle West, both coasts and the rest of the United States.

 

There are varying levels of obscenity in televangelist Pat Robertson's suggestion that an elected Latin American president, Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, should be killed. Robertson's already trying to back off, claiming that his phrase "take him out" could mean a lot of things. You bet. It's sort of like the fight over the meaning of "is."

 

Come on. The meaning was clear. Robertson's "700 Club" show (although carried by ABC Family Channel) deserves a soft-core, single-X rating for trying to revive the U.S. practice of targeting foreign leaders for assassination. Consider the show a harsher double-X for the way it will suggest to some around the world that Christianity might be a religion rooted in blood lust rather than charity.

 

But mark his broadcast XXX for its explicit depiction of extremist influence in American political life. Robertson was a legitimate candidate for the Republican presidential nomination. In 1988, Washington state sent the most pro-Robertson delegation to the party's national convention in New Orleans.

 

Night after night, Robertson prattles on over national TV, promoting a bizarre view of world news. He's not the only embarrassingly extreme religious-political manipulator in the world, but he's ours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...