Jump to content

Converting leashed Quarks to leashless


swaterfall

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

cantfocus.gif Dru thanx so much. I couldn't figure it out on my own.

 

Next question. Has anyone fabricated an index finger and/or pinky rest for their quarks? BD sells a pinky rest for the viper and I've seen some mods for an index finger rest, but nothing for the quarks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about the grivel index finger rest? I've only played with it in the store, but it looks almost universal if you can get the wrap around band that goes around the shaft to fit ??

 

I've also met someone up in lillooet that had modified their bd viper with an index finger thing by drilling a hole through the shaft at the appropriate spot and then bolting on an emt (electical conduit) clamp (the kind designed to hold the tubing secure to a wall). He added a whole lot of skate board tape and voila !! looked kinda ghetto, but he said it worked just fine.

 

.. and drilling a hole in the shaft can't be too big a deal - after all the quarks already come that way for the stud part of the clippy leashless system.

Edited by jja
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way the grivel attachment mounts prevents one from using it for a pinky rest as the mounting piece is above the rest so you can't clasp your hand around the shaft. I use it only as it is intended (a trigger finger mount). A word of caution: trigger finger mounts without pinky rests (which are found on most leash less tools) is a great way to screw up your fingers (pulled tendons anyone?). A friend of mine just duct taped cam hooks to his... worked okay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's an excerpt from an email I got from Twight regarding the grivel trigger mounts:

 

Good luck if you go north in winter,

Mark

 

P.S. Cascade and Mixte have the geometry to match the Tech and Top

Wing tools. They cannot be used on Alp Wing. And be careful of

putting triggers on tools that do not have a "pommel" to support your

hand, it puts a lot of stress on the trigger finger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

P.S. Cascade and Mixte have the geometry to match the Tech and Top

Wing tools. They cannot be used on Alp Wing.

 

hey, that's something i've been wondering about. i have a pair of the top machines (leashless) but i want to now add a pair of "more traditional" alpine tools to the mix - not that i want leashed tools , but i want tools with plunge-able shafts. (i haven't had any problems with the finger trigger but then again i don't do much wi6 or above .. yet. yellaf.gifcantfocus.gif) anyway, my point is i really like the alp wings, but since the geometry is different from my top machines is that going to make it more difficult to switch between two sets of tools during the season? just curious about other people's experiences ...

 

(what would be cool is if the tech wing came with a detachable pommel that could be interchanged with a totally smooth-plunging piece.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the quark will come stock with a hooked pinky-rest next winter (I saw the prototype at the outdoor retailer show in january). the rest will be available as a retro-fit for older quarks, but will require minor modification of the tool.

it looked really good! mine'll get a pair for sure.

cheers,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Don, I recieved an email from Petzl regarding the Quark and it pretty much says the same thing.

 

"We are releasing a spare part this fall that will allow you to do just that. It will attach to the end of the quark with nut and bolt but I believe there will be some modification necessary to attach it. I don’t know specifics yet as this has not even arrived yet. As fall gets closer (August) we should have more information for you."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

first, i have to acknowledge not fully understanding the reason for the leashless trend (old fart, you know), but aren't all these ergonomical devices (pinky rest, etc ..) somewhat defeating the purpose of reaching a freer form of ice climbing. in other words, how is the threshold defined between unfair advantage (i.e. leash) and fair advantage (rests, and such)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the point being you can do things without leashes, like swap tools from hand to hand, hook tools together end-to-end, get in and out of figure-9's, etc much more easily than with leashes. if the only point of going leashless was to make it harder to climb do you really think so many people would be doing it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i wasn't really aware that the techniques you mention were widespreadly useful on most climbs. or at least used commonly enough to offset the advantages offered by leashes. but perhaps my perception of the number of people going leashless is not accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i won't be going leashless any time soon, except maybe for hard, complicated dry tooling. i don't have the forearm strength to grip that hard, that long. i see no sense in making what feels like middling 5.10 into middling 5.11!

 

that said, dru's right in saying that climbing without leashes allows "moves" and movement that isn't possible when "strapped into" the tools. i found this really troublesome the one day i spent up at "the farm" on blackcomb - lotsa tip-torquing and traversing, and it was VERY problematic releasing the tools once you'd moved beyond them. thought-provoking...

 

the "pinky hooks" serve a couple purposes:

1. taking weight - always useful, whether leashed or not,

2. separating your fingers from the ice - again, a "nice" feature, especially with lighter gloves (also nice, for greater dexterity).

 

the technology improves, and the sport moves along. this has always been one of the most appealing aspects of ice-climbing. when i look back on the "crap" we used to climb with, i wonder how we did it at all! and meanwhile, the "ease" provided by the new tools and techniques allows me to fool myself into thinking i'm as good or better than i was "back when". i CLIMB harder, but i'm not convinced i'm "better". i'm an "old fart" too...

 

all good,

cheers,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2. separating your fingers from the ice - again, a "nice" feature, especially with lighter gloves (also nice, for greater dexterity).

 

this was something i didn't realize was a bonus until i heard my leashed partners complaining about mashing their fingers on the ice. somehow, i never had that problem. evils3d.gif

 

j_b, there are quite a few people climbing leashless. maybe not so much in washington because there's not really any sporty ice around, but if you take a trip to ouray or other places where there is much more nice water ice and mixed climbing i think you'd be surprised.

 

climbing leashless is nice and fast. not being tied to my tool i can leave it placed while i shake out quickly and move on with my climbing. plus that other stuff dru said. thumbs_up.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think innovation in tools is great but i was only noting that it was a form of 'aid' (easier to hang on a tool with a pinky rest than one without), which seemed contradictory to the original justification for dropping leashes.

 

tlg: i thought as well that many people today were going leashless. my point was that i wasn't certain it was advantageous for most situations, i.e. aren't most of these people climbing ice and doing a little dry tooling on the side?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...